Thread: Bush signs housing bill to provide mortgage relief

Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge

Let em check that math .... Reagan "started" it ( what does that mean ?? )
Bush Sr. Got it going ....
Clinton SIGNED IT ( instead of saying "wait a minute .. is this really a good idea ?" Are you realy trying to say he was just a helpless pawn ? )
GW Bush came into the picture EIGHT YEARS later... so how does that add up ?

Oh yea, you're not completely biased are ya. ...

Excuse me?? Actually if you go back, I said theres blame to go around to EVERYONE.

All I hear is excuse after excuse and blame on Clinton, well no, that wouldnt be fair. If it was so bad, and everyone is against it now and its such a bad idea, why hasnt O'le Bushy done something about it?? Whats his excuse?

Originally Posted by jbbarn

Libs never are.

Go back and read my posts before you go spouting off with some bull **** response.

Originally Posted by freeby4me

I have a mighty big beef with that seeings how Bush has been in for the last 7 years and has had more than enough opportunities to put an end to it. That is most definately something that the blame belongs all around, for a very long time now.

Right there, went and got it for ya.

Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge

Let em check that math .... Reagan "started" it ( what does that mean ?? )
Bush Sr. Got it going ....
Clinton SIGNED IT ( instead of saying "wait a minute .. is this really a good idea ?" Are you realy trying to say he was just a helpless pawn ? )
GW Bush came into the picture EIGHT YEARS later... so how does that add up ?
That would require Bill Clinton having made an INTELLIGENT decision,hard to do with your pants around your ankles,I guess.

Oh yea, you're not completely biased are ya. ...

Oh yea, I forgot, INTELLIGENCE is based on who starts the most costliest war in money and lives.

Originally Posted by jbbarn

Take a chill pill!
Bush should have repealed NAFTA,Bill Clinton is still an ass!
Libs tend to be biased because ya'll don't take time to THINK.
IMO

What kind of response is that?

You are attacking me for being biased when I was the first person to say something about blame needing to go ALL AROUND. That does not mean ONE SIDE. That means ALL sides. Everyone. Can I make myself anymore clear??

Mesue did an excellent post explaining this in a summed up way, http://www.bigbigforums.com/95961801-post15.html
but because she also said blame needs to go all around she is also incorrect?

Its rather ironic that you're accusing me of being biased and "not taking the time to think" when I've made it more than obvious in this thread that this is not a one party issue.
Some people, dont tend to think and it has nothing to do with their political affilitation.

Let's face it. We have a WORLD economy now. You think you are buying Made in America but so many parts in your car are made in other countries. One part in America, another part in Mexico, another one in China. I think it's almost impossible to buy anything exclusively Made in America anymore. And it does keep the overall price for the product down.

My hubby works with customers in China, Spain, Mexico, etc. Some buy parts from the company he works for and some provide parts for the final product.

Both political parties need to start working together or we are all screwed.

And those who are drowning in debt by taking on a mansion on a little house salary are now hitting the wall that was always there. If they didn't do the math before they signed the paper and read the fine print---and no one held a gun to their heads---then they have no one to blame but themselves.

Our government can't be a our nanny forever. People have to take some responsibility sometime for their decisions.

Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge

Great cover response ... non reply and all. But what does Abraham Lincoln and the War Between the States have to do with this ?? Now you are *really* reaching for the History Books.

Exactly, a perfect response to your post.

This is beyond typical Jolie. And also tiresome.