-
Re: Deja Vu all over again.
Originally Posted by
Cessie
Partially wrong on the liberal part. I’m socially liberal, fiscally conservative. Totally correct on the doom and gloom. I see little ahead, for at least the short haul, 20 to 40 years, but worsening conditions for this country. I have young children and this is not the world I wanted for them, so if I want them to grow up in this country, I can’t afford the luxury of rose colored glasses and sticking my head in the sand.
If I give you $50 would you adopt me as one your sons? 
Looking for Sympathy? It's in the Dictionary between Sh!t and Syphilis.
-
-
06-09-2006 03:44 AM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
Re: Deja Vu all over again.
Oh, I'm sorry I thought you were liberal since all liberals---restating, all radical liberals--say one is homophobic if one is for marriage being just between one man and one woman.
What is wrong with marraige staying the way it has been from the beginning of marriage? And it is a slippery slope. One man and one woman. Turns into one man and numerous women or the other way around.
All kinds of minority groups will want the marriage status confirmed on them.
Think I am talking out of my ___? Looked what happened to abortion. We now have abortion on demand and any kind. Even the partial-birth abortions are just fine and dandy. I think many in society have learned when a crack in the door is opened it is flung wide open.
We have to guard against it happening again.
And if you stopped listening to the liberals you wouldn't be so pessimestic. It's all a ruse to get votes next time anyway. Keep that in mind.
We have a strong economy. Depends on what stats you want to believe.
-
-
Re: Deja Vu all over again.
Originally Posted by
janelle
What is wrong with marraige staying the way it has been from the beginning of marriage? And it is a slippery slope. One man and one woman. Turns into one man and numerous women or the other way around.
All kinds of minority groups will want the marriage status confirmed on them.
No one is looking to change heterosexual marriage. What is wrong with allowing two consenting adult get married if they are the same sex?
What minority groups? You're speculating.
Looking for Sympathy? It's in the Dictionary between Sh!t and Syphilis.
-
-
Have you seen the TV series "Big Love" - trying to make multiple marriage mainstream....
Laissez les bon temps rouler! 
Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! 
Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?
-
-
Re: Deja Vu all over again.
Originally Posted by
YNKYH8R
No one is looking to change heterosexual marriage. What is wrong with allowing two consenting adult get married if they are the same sex?
What minority groups? You're speculating.
If marriage allows same sex unions than you ARE changing heterosexual marriage. Marriage becomes a union between not just a man and a woman but between the same sexes. A HUGE change if you ask me.
A child can tell you this. They will ask why are those two men kissing or why are those two men getting married if their parents go to the marriage. Then they will be told cause they love each other just like your mommy and daddy love each other. Yes, the meaning of heterosexual marriage will be changed.
-
-
Re: Deja Vu all over again.
Children at some point will find out about homosexuality. To prevent prejudice and ignorance people should talk with their children about homosexuality.
Obviously we can go around and around and disagree about this issue. However my original point for writing this vent was because of a waste of time to the Senate to debat ethis issue. The vote didn't go through AGAIN. And they'll do another vote next month. It's frusrating.
I can understand if people want to make the issue a states only issue, it doesn't need to be an amendment.
Looking for Sympathy? It's in the Dictionary between Sh!t and Syphilis.
-
Reply With Quote