Thread: San Bernardino

"It took Obama’s FBI two full days to declare the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino, CA, a terrorist attack. That was after Obama tried to float the idea that it was an act of workplace violence.

Huusam Ayloush, spokesman for the domestic hate group the Council on American Islamic Relations (C.A.I.R.) sitting approximately 30 minutes from one of the most horrific terrorist attacks on American soil – claimed that the attack was America’s fault. Appearing on Chris Cuomo’s CNN show, “New Day” he had the shameless audacity to blame the terrorist attack in Paris and California on America.
Obama used the FBI and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives in an attempt to control the narrative in the aftermath of San Bernardino. Why?

Why would Obama and his Justice Department think it necessary to protect those out to murder us? In the blink of an eye the public knew all there was to know about the transgendered gunman/gun-gal or whatever that there was to know. In the case of the Muslim terrorist attack in California the White House did all they could to delay the public knowing the perpetrators were Muslims.

Obama assured America his administration would be the most transparent one in history. Specific to that point in the aftermath of another act of Muslim terrorism, there are three things glaringly transparent: 1) Obama favors Muslims terrorists over Americans; 2) Obama is not inclined to hide his affections for terrorists over Americans; and 3) for all of President Roosevelt’s negatives, thank God, Obama wasn’t in office when Pearl Harbor was attacked."

http://mychal-massie.com/premium/fdr...1bbf8a32ac9103

Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge

Now from the unbiased reporting of the Liberal Left

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.2456491

The Vilification of Michael
Posted on December 6, 2015

On December 2, 2015, in San Bernardino, California there was a massacre by Islamic terrorists that left 14 dead and 21 injured. Among the dead is Nicholas Thalasinos or as I knew him Michael Thalasinos. Since his death, the Leftist media has been hateful and despicable. They have tried to cast him as some hateful bigot instead of a patriot. As some kind instigator instead of someone who had a just cause to distrust those of the Islamic faith.

The left doesn’t get the last word. I received an impression today and the impression said:”Don’t let the vultures get the last word. Write an article about him. Write an article about him now before you forget.” So here I am following my impression. So let me tell you about Michael or his true name Nicholas Thalasinos. He was a real funny man. He often made me laugh. While I only knew him through posts on Facebook I still got to know the man.

Of course, the fact that he cares about Christ, unborn children and his fellow Jews makes him a bigot, someone who deserves to die because he believes in goodness. The way the media has gone out of their way to desecrate this man makes it evident that he was a man of good and honorable faith otherwise why attack him? Satan is strong and he is trying to tear down not only Christianity but America which has been a beacon not only to Christianity but to all faiths. Yet Islam is trying to take that inclusiveness that is America and dominate it out of existence.

I won’t give you a full view of the ugliness the press has done to diminish this man, but you should have a small example of what the Left is doing:

Thalasinos was an anti-government, anti-Islam, pro-NRA, rabidly anti-Planned Parenthood kinda guy, who posted that it would be “Freaking Awesome” if hateful Ann Coulter was named head of Homeland Security.

So as you can see if you are anti-Islam, pro-NRA and think Planned Parenthood should be brought up on human rights charges, like me and many others do you are a hateful bigot. Oh and as for Ann Coulter Ms. Stasi, I got this little pic for you: FullSizeRender (1)

So I guess my liking Ann Coulter puts me in a position where I deserve to be killed. Michael was a good man with a good heart and cared about his country and his fellow man. He despised what the world was coming to and talked about it freely. To insinuate he is somehow culpable in the deaths of 14 people is absolutely abhorrent and Ms. Stasi should be sued and have everything taken away from her for her libellous depiction of a man she didn’t even know.

Oh and let’s look at Ms. Stasi’s facebook status:

To The Scum Bucket who stole my engagement ring in the women’s bathroom of the NY Daily News yesterday: Please know that you have just given yourself the worst possible karma.

Huh? Sounds rather hateful Ms Stasi. What kind of karma are you talking about? Obviously, such an expression calls for your death. I see how it is you can call people scum buckets when they upset you, but no one else is allowed to have upsetting emotions. Now, what if after you wrote that your office got sprayed down by the person you called a scum bucket and her husband and friend, would you be responsible for the deaths. You are nothing but a self-righteous hypocrite who has the audacity to demean a man you did not know.

Well let this be the real story of Nicholas Thalasinos. Let it be known that Linda Stasi is a liar and that Nicholas Thalasinos was a good and decent man. Let it be known he cared about truth, dignity and that he loved this world as much as he could without becoming a part of it. Let it be known that Nicholas Thalasinos stood for what was right and died for what he believed in. Let it be known, he died a hero!

https://blacknright.wordpress.com/20...on-of-michael/

Will Mother of San Bernardino Terrorist be Charged After What the FBI Reportedly Found in her Car?
[I[Mom of San Bernardino terrorist may not be so innocent after all.
By Jennifer Burke
Syed Farook and his Pakastani national wife Tashfeen Malik are responsible for the deaths of 14 people and injury to 21 more in San Bernardino. The two committed jihad in America when they opened fire on Farook’s co-workers who had just months before thrown him a baby shower. The two were killed by police after they opened fire on police officers in a low-speed chase.

Farook’s mother, Rafia Farook, lived with the couple but claimed to not know anything about the couple’s terrorism plans. Attorneys for the family claimed during a strange press conference last week that Rafia Farook lived upstairs so she had no knowledge of what was going on downstairs. They also complained that she had been interrogated by the FBI for seven hours. Despite claims of her innocence and supposed ignorance about a planned attack by her son and daughter-in-law, a search of her vehicle produced some damning findings.

The FBI smashed in the window of the black Lexus IS300 which was located near the home in Redlands. The Daily Mail reports on the inventory of items taken that was left on the front seat of the car.

An inventory left behind on the front seat read: ‘Apple iPhone, multi-tool, key, business card, miscellaneous indicia, bank receipt, shooting targets, hammer, vice grips, U-Haul receipt, tire receipt, notebook, garment, GoPro packaging, vacuumings, legal documents’.

The vehicle was insured under Rafia Farook’s name and her son, Syed, was listed as an insured driver.

When the terrorist attack occurred, initial reports stated that the terrorists were wearing body armor, masks, and GoPro cameras. After Farook and Malik were killed, authorities said that they were not wearing GoPro cameras. Now, the discovery of the GoPro camera receipt adds a new element to the investigation of the terrorist attack.

Although Barack Obama said during his speech to the nation on Monday that there was no evidence that these two terrorists had been directed by a global terrorist organization, ISIS, Obama’s JV team, did announce prior to his speech that Farook and Malik were their followers. Malik is reported to have pledged allegiance to ISIS online right before she and her husband launched their terrorist attack.

In addition, GoPro cameras are often used to produce videos during attacks to be used by ISIS for recruitment. If the two did wear GoPro cameras during the attack, then where are those cameras now?

Although many on the left, including Obama, are trying to make this terrorist attack about gun control, law enforcement discovered three pipe bombs at the Inland Regional Center, the site of the terrorist attack. In addition, the Redlands home of the terrorist couple was described by authorities as an IED factory. Numerous IEDs and materials to make more were found, as well as a dozen pipe bombs and thousands of rounds of ammunition.

Given these new discoveries, will there be charges filed against Rafia Farook? Does she know more than she has claimed?

Rafia Farook is also reportedly associated with the Islamic Circle of North America, a group with known terrorist ties as well as ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic extremism.


http://politistick.com/will-mother-o...nd-in-her-car/

If the two did wear GoPro cameras during the attack, then where are those cameras now?

Witnesses stated there were THREE shooters. ISIS initially celebrated "Three Lions" First reports had police seeking three suspects. What happened to the third person ?

When the enemedia interviewed the family of Syed Farook, they were deferential and submissive to the accomplices of “unspeakable carnage” in the cause of Allah in San Bernardino.

Americans were brutally murdered at a Christmas party and Chris Cuomo acted like he was interviewing the Pope during a Q & A with the family attorneys. The media cows at the CAIR press conference with Farook family members lobbed soft balls despite the absurdity of many of the statements.

The mother lived in the bomb making factory – how is she still free? Or would arresting her be considered ‘islamophobic?”

Check this out:


EXCLUSIVE: Shooting targets, GoPro packaging, hammer and ‘vise grips’ found by FBI in car belonging to San Bernardino shooter’s MOTHER

Car registered to Rafia Farook was searched by FBI agents after her son and daughter-in-law massacred 14 last Wednesday
She lived in same house as where the couple amassed thousands of rounds of ammo and built pipe bombs
FBI agents raided Lexus registered in her name and seized list of items, including packaging for GoPro
Unclear what happened to camera as law enforcement say one was not used in course of mass murderers by ISIS-inspired husband and wife
Rafia Farook has not been charged but attorney-general has said her possible knowledge or involvement is being looked at ‘very closely’
The family’s lawyer says mother did not know her son was planning atrocity



By Ben Ashford In San Bernardino For Dailymail.com, December 8, 2015

FBI agents found an empty GoPro package, shooting targets and tools inside a car belonging to the mother of San Bernardino mass shooter Syed Farook, Daily Mail Online can reveal.

Authorities have repeatedly denied rumors that Farook, 28, and his wife Tashfeen Malik, 27, strapped recording devices to their body armor as they stormed the Inland Regional Center, slaughtering 14 people and wounding 21.

However Daily Mail Online has a discovered that an empty GoPro box was one of dozens of items seized from a black Lexus IS300 in the wake of last Wednesday’s massacre.

Documents confirm the car was insured by Farook’s 62-year-old mother Rafia, who lived in the same home in Redlands, California, where he and Malik built pipe bombs and stored thousands of rounds of ammunition.

Seized: This is the Lexis IS300 belonging to Rafia Farook which was searched by the FBI. They found GoPro packaging. The camera’s whereabouts are unclear. Law enforcement said one was not used by the terrorists. The discovery adds a chilling new dimension to the ongoing FBI investigation as helmet-mounted GoPros have been used by ISIS fanatics before to capture dramatic footage for online recruitment videos. One such clip circulated by the terror network in June revealed the final moments of a Jihadi ‘martyr’ before he was shot dead by an Iraqi soldier. The four-door sedan was located just a few minutes’ walk from the Farooks’ apartment as FBI agents stormed the property last Wednesday afternoon to search for guns and explosives.

They smashed the driver’s window to gain access before carrying out a pain-staking forensic examination and seizing a trove of potential evidence including paperwork, targets and tools. An inventory left behind on the front seat read: ‘Apple iPhone, multi-tool, key, business card, miscellaneous indicia, bank receipt, shooting targets, hammer, vice grips, U-Haul receipt, tire receipt, notebook, garment, GoPro packaging, vacuumings, legal documents’. Syed Farook is also listed on insurance documents as a named driver but it is now known whether he or his mother drove the 2005 vehicle more, or who the GoPro and the items found inside belonged to. Before embarking on last week’s mass shooting, he and Malik left their six-month-old daughter at home with Rafia, saying they had to go to a doctor’s appointment. Hours after the ensuing slaughter, cops pulled Rafia her over in her other son’s SUV and held her for questioning.


http://pamelageller.com/2015/12/shoo...s-mother.html/

In his address to the nation Sunday night, President Obama called on America to “enlist Muslim communities” to combat terrorism. However, like other statements the president made from the Oval Office last night — such as his insistence that he attends intelligence briefings “each and every day” — this particular statement appears to be little more than smoke and mirrors.






Actually, make that vapor in this case. Because it turns out that, despite the president’s suggestion, since 9/11, “we collectively have received nearly zero help from the Muslim Community, according to former FBI Counterterrorism agent John Guandolo.

What’s even worse, perhaps, is what these Islamic organizations ARE doing instead, according to Guandolo.

Via Breitbart:

Though President Barack Obama claimed that America must “enlist Muslim communities” to combat terrorism in his Sunday evening Oval Office address, former FBI Counterterrorism Agent John Guandolo said on Monday’s Breitbart News Daily (6AM-9AM EST on Sirius XM Patriot channel 125) that

Guandolo, who pointed out on Friday’s Breitbart News Daily that a “vast majority” of U.S. mosques and Islamic centers are a part of a much larger “jihadi network,” told host and Breitbart News Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon that though Muslim community leaders “certainly give the air as if they are helping,” if one looks at the “major Islamic organizations, the major Islamic centers in the United States,” they have “condemned all of the counter-terrorism policies and they’ve gotten the government to kowtow to them, to turn only to them for advice.”

And what advice do they give them?” Guandolo asked. “That Islam doesn’t stand for this and that everything you’re doing is the reason for what happened—9/11 is your fault because of your policies.”

Sound familiar? As we reported earlier, this is straight out of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) talking points, who said this after last week’s terrorist attack in San Bernardino:

“Let’s not forget that some of our own foreign policy, as Americans, as the west, have fueled that extremism… We are partly responsible. Terrorism is a global problem, not a Muslim problem. And the solution has to be global. Everyone has a role in it.”

Breitbart continues:

Last night, Obama said that “if we’re to succeed in defeating terrorism we must enlist Muslim communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through suspicion and hate.”

Guandolo said he doesn’t necessarily agree with the idea that “we have to work with the Muslim community in order to solve this problem here in the United States,” but “if you are going to work with the Muslim community, the U.S. government” should not be “exclusively working with Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood entities without exception” like it is doing now. Guandolo named the Muslim Public Affairs Council, the Islamic Society of North America, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), and the Muslim American Society.

“Those are who they’re working with and others that are Muslim Brotherhood or ideologically directly aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood,” he added, pointing out that Attorney General Loretta Lynch spoke at the Muslim Advocates—another such organization—last Thursday.

Guandolo said Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson is speaking about Muslim civil rights on Monday evening at The Adams Center in Sterling, Virginia, which is associated with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). He said evidence presented at the Holy Land terrorism-funding trial revealed that ISNA is “the nucleus of the Muslim Brotherhood here” and “directly funds Hamas leaders and organizations overseas.” He also pointed out that the Holy Land Foundation, the largest Islamic charity in America, was a “Hamas organization at the time it was indicted and Hamas is an inherent part of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

He said it will be nearly impossible to so successfully combat terrorists “so long as the U.S. government… emboldens and empowers Muslim Brotherhood organizations here.”

“If you expect FBI and others to aggressively pursue them, it’s not going to happen because our leaders — President, Secretary of State, national security adivsers, generals at the Pentagon—are are turning to their advisers who in fact are Muslim Brotherhood leaders to say what should we and what shouldn’t we do,” he said.

Guandolo said “it gets down to the local ground level where our behavior becomes insane and we do things like” tell FBI agents to take their socks off while arresting people at mosques so “you’re arresting somebody in your socks. It’s not only insane but there’s an officer-safety issue as well.” He added there was absolutely “no real logic about what happened in San Bernardino” when the F.B.I. allowed the media to rummage through the home of the San Bernardino terrorists and said “this kind of mindset” entered the FBI because of Muslim leaders who are advising the federal government on Islam and terrorism.

Suddenly, it all becomes clear.

http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/12/fo...ghting-terror/

The evidence is overwhelming that the San Bernardino shooting was a terrorist plot, and suspicious information keeps being revealed. We now know the attack was planned since 2012, and that a $28,000 deposit was made into Syed Farook’s bank account two weeks before the attack.

There’s also reason to be suspicious that a third shooter may have been involved. Some news outlets suggest the third shooter never existed — and was merely a figment of the “fog of war” in the early minutes and hours immediately following the attack. However, there remain multiple eyewitness accounts — and persistent questions — about the existence of this potential third shooter.

To quote Pamela Geller: http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...the-third-man/

One eyewitness, Sara Abdelmageed, gave extensive detail to Scott Pelley on the CBS Evening News. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwTYja7GXcY

Here’s the exchange: “I heard shots fired and it was from — you know — an automatic weapon,” Abdelmageed said, “we looked out the window a second set of shots goes off…and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on. They were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three one of them started to shoot into the room.”

Abdelmageed said that she “couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on — black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side, long sleeve shirt, gloves, huge assault rifle six magazines I just saw three dressed exactly the same.”

Pelley asked her: “You are certain you saw three men?” Abdelmageed answered: “Yes. It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s45OeXNRZng

Another eyewitness, Juan Hernandez, saw the same thing: three men. He said the shooters were “three white men in military fatigues” who “took off” in a “black Impala or SUV.”

CBS Evening News titled one of its early reports: “Officials: 2 of 3 suspects dead in San Bernardino shooting.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN4xth0k-Ds

And then suddenly, the third man disappeared. No media reports mention him anymore. No law enforcement officials appear to be searching for him. He is gone without a trace, and no one has even noticed that he is missing, or was ever there in the first place.

What happened to the third man, if these accounts are accurate, is a mystery. So who could it be? And where is he now?

I’m no fan of conspiracy theories, but it wouldn’t be too far a stretch to think Farook could’ve had an accomplice that was a close family member. The mother of Syed Farook is an active member of the Islamic Circle of North America, “a Muslim organization that promotes the establishment of a caliphate and has ties to a radical Pakistani political group called Jamaat-e-Islami.”

The rest of Farook’s family needs to be extensively vetted. Instead, they’re getting legal aid in keeping the child of the killers from the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). On the other hand, CAIR has been designated as a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emeries, so maybe we can kill two birds with one stone and vet them all at once. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/11/17...arab-emirates/

Let’s hope that the political correctness that seems to have greased the way for this attack to go off without a hitch — which we’ve reported on here and here — doesn’t do the same for the search for a potential third killer.

http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/12/wh...rdino-shooter/

Consider this : the wife may have been the "get away driver" and what we have are TWO missing shooters - since all eye witness reports are consistent with THREE MALE SHOOTERS.

When the wife was shot ... she was wearing shorts...

Could have changed clothes ....

"They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”

The wife was also described as being 90 pounds and petite ...

And consider the news we shared here that a DHS whistleblower has come forth asserting that the Obama administration forced him to shut down an investigation into a Deobandi sect militant Islamic group associated with Syed Farook.

Why? Because as he stated, it was racial profiling. http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/12/un...rists-because/

We’ve said it before: political correctness is not only dangerous to our constitutional freedoms, it’s increasingly endangering — even claiming — American lives. We saw the San Bernardino neighbor who opted not to report suspicious activity surrounding terrorist Syed Farook — a report that possibly could have helped avert the deaths of 14.


And now, there’s this. According to a U.S. Customs and Border Patrol analyst, our own government shut down an investigation into Islamists linked to Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik. If you’ve been following along, you may have guessed the reason for this seemingly inexplicable move by the authorities charged with protecting the security of Americans. Yes, they were wanted to protect the “civil liberties” of this terrorist-supporting network.

As Breitbart reports: http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...al-terrorists/

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been accused of deleting intelligence records relating to dangerous Islamists linked to terrorists Sayed Farook and Tashfeen Malik, because they wanted to protect the “civil liberties” of members of the caliphate-supporting network.

Phil Haney, a U.S. Customs and Border Patrol analyst, says he was ordered to stop investigating Deobandi Islamist groups and his work on them was erased. He even says he was subjected to a disciplinary when he attempted to blow the whistle.

If he’d been allowed to continue his investigation, he claims Malik’s visa application would have been flagged for greater scrutiny.

He explained: “The administration was more concerned about the civil rights and liberties of foreign Islamic groups with terrorist ties than the safety and security of Americans”.

Analyst Phil Haney told Fox News that he once worked as a researcher looking into potential terrorists in the Passenger Analysis Units at the Department of Homeland Security in Atlanta, as well as at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s National Targeting Center.

Mr. Haney says that he had been identifying and tracking members of the al-Huda and Tablighi Jamaat groups, offshoots of the radical Deobandi school of Islam, which was founded in British colonial India specifically to oppose western culture.

Tablighi Jamaat is a Deobandi revivalist movement whose mandate is, according to its leading advocate Ebrahim Rangooni, to save the Muslim world “from the culture and civilisation of the Jews and the Christians…” To this end, he has suggested cultivating “such hatred for their ways as human beings have to urine and excrement.”

Tablighi Jamaat have been linked to 80 per cent of all recent terrorist related crimes in France. http://www.cf2r.org/fr/foreign-analy....php#_ftnref22

Mr. Haney’s work tracking the radical movement was considered so important that he says he was given an agency award for identifying potential terrorists, and he was asked to become part of the National Targeting Center, which works to connect the dots and build a bigger picture of terrorist activity.

However, after more than six months tracking the Deobandis, Homeland Security unexpectedly halted his investigation on the request of the State Department’s Office of Civil Rights, Haney alleges.

According to Mr. Haney, the agencies argued that since the radical Islamist groups are not specially designated as terrorist organizations, tracking individuals related to them was a violation of the their “civil liberties.”

The DHS furthermore subjected Haney to an investigation, which ultimately showed no wrongdoing on his part — though they nonetheless sequestered him and revoked his security clearance and database access in September 2014.

If Haney’s account is indeed true, it suggests that our own Department of Homeland Security — whose mission, as the name suggests, is protecting our SECURITY — cowed to pressure from this office within the state whose mission is “advancing diversity,” propagating “fairness, equity and inclusion.”

I wonder how “fair” the families of the 14 loved ones lost in San Bernardino think that decision is.

Of course, as shocking as this information is, it shouldn’t be all that surprising anymore with the Obama administration. We have a commander in chief who refuses to utter the words, “Islamic extremism,” and shames anyone against his plan to further ramp up Muslim refugees to the U.S. as “racist” and “un-American”— despite the acknowledged and proven threats it poses.

Meanwhile his attorney general reveals her “greatest fear” is anti-Muslim rhetoric, while threatening to prosecute Americans for speech and promising to use her Justice Department to protect Muslims from “violence” and discrimination.

Against that backdrop, the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol analyst’s allegations fit right in, don’t they?

And, once again, we can hand it to the Obama administration: it’s crystal clear on where its priorities lie. And, once again, we see it’s NOT with the protection of the American people.

Barack Obama was determined to transform America into a progressive wasteland, and he’s succeeded thus far throughout his seven years in office.

The worst part though, is that 44 is incredibly lenient when it comes to radical Islamic terror, and nobody understands the logic.

A new report is claiming that Obama told the FBI and the NSC to downplay the angle of the San Bernardino terror attack carried out by crazed Muslim couple Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik.

The reason?

It has to be because the Obama administration doesn’t want people knowing that Islamic terror is very much alive and thriving.

From Daily Caller:

The FBI has taken heat for failing to immediately classify the San Bernardino shootings as terrorism, but a new report shows that FBI reluctance could have been due to external pressure from the White House.

A source told Jack Murphy of SOFREP that the FBI instantly believed the shooting, which left 14 dead, to be a clear act of terrorism. The White House, however, didn’t feel the same way and quickly moved in to squash the terror classification.

This source added that as soon as the shooting took place, Obama convened a meeting with the National Security Council and the heads of other federal enforcement agencies to discuss a public relations strategy.

Part of the reason for trying to avoid the designation of the shootings as terrorism is because it threatens to upset the Obama administration’s strategy in Syria. A case of Islamic terrorism in the U.S. would put additional pressure on the administration to play a much more active role in the conflict.

Pretty messed up.

Obama and the left would’ve preferred the terror attack in San Bernardino that left 14 dead to be a case of workplace violence in order to further push their gun banning agenda.

Facepalm.

If liberals know how to do anything, it’s dodge, duck, dip, dive, and deflect.

The saddest part is that the American public suffers the most.
http://www.youngcons.com/report-clai...ardino-attack/