-
Originally Posted by
sunniekiss
Sandy, that is IF they have insurance. I know they are "supposed" to have insurance but we all know what people are supposed to do & really do are 2 different things.
You can go to small claims but even if you win, if they have nothing you get nothing.
Don't even get me started on that or else I will already break my resolutions.
If they are the owners of the apartment, then with the judgement she can put a lien on the apartment and eventually......she would get paid if and when they tried to sell it.
Even if the current occupants are renters, I do believe she can still sue the owner of the apartment for damages.
Mrs Pepperpot is a lady who always copes with the tricky situations that she finds herself in....
-
-
12-31-2009 01:59 PM
# ADS
Circuit advertisement
-
Originally Posted by
sunniekiss
Sandy, that is IF they have insurance. I know they are "supposed" to have insurance but we all know what people are supposed to do & really do are 2 different things.
You can go to small claims but even if you win, if they have nothing you get nothing.
Don't even get me started on that or else I will already break my resolutions.
Unless it is paid for they are required by the mortgage company to have homeowners coverage. The Condo association however might be the one on the hook if it were caused by a defective/leaky pipe. However, I would be willing to bet they have insurance especially since it is a rental unit.
-
Reply With Quote