Thread: The United Nations - Agenda 21

A Time to die: U.N. ads promote killing off the elderly


Hey all you wrinkly, middle-aged has-beens: Are you ready to move over and let the next generation have your spot on the planet? After all, you’ve lived a good life. And your aging body is going to cost taxpayers a lot more than the salt you think you are worth. In other words, your return-on-investment isn’t looking so good to the United Nations.

In case you haven’t heard, our brains are being conditioned to look upon you as the burden you are. And it’s time you see yourself that way too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=SXnA2Jg8Z-w


That’s right. The UN is promoting we EUTHANIZE our aging parents.

If that ad didn’t send chills up your spine, the next one will. These commercials are pointing us to Agenda 21, a global strategy to reduce the population in the years ahead. Yes, it sounds like something out of a zombie movie, but it’s been going on now for several years as we’ve been reporting. (Check out this recent interview we did on Agenda 21 http://standupforthetruth.com/files/...FT_6-20-12.mp3 )

Disguised as environmental stewardship, Agenda 21 is nothing more than repackaged Socialism, and many heavy-hitters with billions of dollars and a worldwide influence are behind it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPh2T...layer_embedded

Of course the mainstream media has been ignoring this. And only one well-known media outlet — Glenn Beck — has been sounding the alarm. And while we usually don’t include him in our Christian watchman resources, this video is worth a look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esJY2...layer_embedded

One last video, showing how Agenda 21 will undoubtedly affect the future http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzoN0...layer_embedded

http://standupforthetruth.com/2012/1...f-the-elderly/

A few days ago much interest in this community was piqued by a discussion about Agenda 21. So I contacted an aquaintance, Mr. Barry Hugghins, and solicited his views. Mr Hugghins has earned degrees in psychology and chemical enginneering, is a business man, with experience in the international trade markets and holds an elective office in another parish. He is also on the Board of the Louisiana Tea Party. Through the years he and I have had conversations about social, political and historic matters; he is possessed of an admirable intellect. Thus, with his permission, I post, with Mr. Freneaux's kind assistance, Mr. Hugghin's response to my inquiry relative to Agenda 21.

Mr. Hugghin's response:

Agenda 21 is a hot topic everywhere because, although it's 20 years old, the public is just now waking up to it.Tea Parties are solidly against Agenda 21, and are working hard to educate the public about what it is and what it could mean. Tea Parties are also working to prevent its implementation, and to repeal it where it has gained a foothold. My basis for opposing Agenda 21 is the fact that its view of property rights is inconsistent with the view of our founders, as expressed in our constitution. Agenda 21 is based on a very collectivist, socialist, anti private property worldview as opposed to the American idea of individual property ownership. Agenda 21 promotes shifting the determination of growth patterns into the hands of the government and away from individual choice. If enacted, it functions as a very great obstacle to self-determination in the use of your own property. I see this as a "taking" of property, and in most cases it will be an uncompensated taking, which us counter to the intent of our founders.Agenda 21 also grows government, something we have more of now than we can afford.Basically, it boils down to this: who has the right to determine what you can do with your own property, you or the government? If you believe that this right solely belongs to the property owner, then Agenda 21 is a serious threat to this basic American right.

Scorecard: How Many Rights Have Americans REALLY Lost?
Posted on February 21, 2013 by WashingtonsBlog

How Many Constitutional Freedoms Do We Still Have?

Preface: While a lot of people talk about the loss of our Constitutional liberties, people usually speak in a vague, generalized manner … or focus on only one issue and ignore the rest.

This post explains the liberties guaranteed in the Bill of Rights – the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution – and provides a scorecard on the extent of the loss of each right.

First Amendment The 1st Amendment protects speech, religion, assembly and the press:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

However, the government is arresting those speaking out http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/...speak-out.html … and violently crushing peaceful assemblies which attempt to petition the government for redress. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/...-protests.html

A federal judge found that the law allowing indefinite detention of Americans without due process has a “chilling effect” on free speech. http://www.businessinsider.com/ndaa-...blocked-2012-9 And see this http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/04/0...of-journalism/ and this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...s-lawsuit-ndaa

The threat of being labeled a terrorist for exercising our First Amendment rights certainly violates the First Amendment. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/...-suppress.html The government is using laws to crush dissent, http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/...-business.html and it’s gotten so bad that even U.S. Supreme Court justices are saying that we are descending into tyranny. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/...tatorship.html

For example, the following actions may get an American citizen living on U.S. soil labeled as a “suspected terrorist” today:

■Being young http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/10/insider-threat/ (if you live near a battle zone, you are fair game; http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/...ttle-zone.html and see this http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/...ft-behind.html )

■Using social media http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/10/insider-threat/

■Reporting or doing journalism http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/...errorists.html

■Speaking out against government policies

■Protesting anything (such as participating in the “Occupy” movement)

■Questioning war (even though war reduces our national security; and see this)

■Criticizing the government’s targeting of innocent civilians with drones (although killing innocent civilians with drones is one of the main things which increases terrorism. And see this)

■Asking questions about pollution (even at a public Congressional hearing?)

■Paying cash at an Internet cafe

■Asking questions about Wall Street shenanigans

■Holding gold

■Creating alternative currencies

■Stocking up on more than 7 days of food (even though all Mormons are taught to stockpile food, and most Hawaiians store up on extra food)

■Having bumper stickers saying things like “Know Your Rights Or Lose Them”

■Investigating factory farming

■Infringing a copyright

■Taking pictures or videos

■Talking to police officers

■Wearing a hoodie

■Driving a van

■Writing on a piece of paper

■(Not having a Facebook account may soon be added)

And holding the following beliefs may also be considered grounds for suspected terrorism:

■Being frustrated with “mainstream ideologies”

■Valuing online privacy

■Supporting Ron Paul or being a libertarian

■Liking the Founding Fathers

■Being a Christian

■Being anti-tax, anti-regulation or for the gold standard

■Being “reverent of individual liberty”

■Being “anti-nuclear”

■“Believe in conspiracy theories”

■“A belief that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack”

■“Impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

■“Insert religion into the political sphere”

■“Those who seek to politicize religion”

■“Supported political movements for autonomy”

■Being “anti-abortion”

■Being “anti-Catholic”

■Being “anti-global”

■“Suspicious of centralized federal authority”

■“Fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

■“A belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in … survivalism”

■Opposing genetically engineered food

■Opposing surveillance


Of course, Muslims are more or less subject to a separate system of justice in America.

And 1st Amendment rights are especially chilled when power has become so concentrated that the same agency which spies on all Americans also decides who should be assassinated.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/...stitution.html

Dare you to read about the other nine ?

Read also http://www.bigbigforums.com/news-inf...gnty-lost.html

Agenda 21 And the Climate Change Lie
Posted on April 9 2013



A month after CNN anchor Deb Feyerick wondered if an approaching asteroid “is an example of, perhaps, global warming,” we learn from David Whitehouse of the Global Warming Policy Foundation that, “The global temperature standstill shows that climate models are diverging from observations. If we have not passed it already, we are on the threshold of global observations becoming incompatible with the consensus theory of climate change.”

So, all the global warming alarmists who say we need to change the way we live because everything we do is harming the planet and causing temps to rise are going to have to come up with another excuse to control our lives, Agenda 21-style.

Even though global warming hysteria had not begun in 1992, over 200 countries signed on to introduce “sustainable development” into society, through the U.N. program Agenda 21. Maurice Strong, who was Secretary General of the U.N.’s Earth said, “Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” So, Agenda 21 was created to stop all that affluence—your United States affluence—from harming the planet.

But then Agenda 21 became a bad word when people figured out what it was. And every bad idea needs a great marketing plan. Sustainability became SMART GROWTH, and buzzwords were used like BIODIVERSITY, LIVEABLE CITIES, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, and GOING GREEN.

Today, Obama is calling it “FUTURE EARTH.” But no matter what name it goes by, it is a comprehensive global scheme hatched by elitist “one per centers” who want to control the way you live, create an international jurisdiction and profit off your existence.

This is being done all in the name of saving the planet, of course.

Little codes and regulations are creeping into your local area right now. The International Code Council has developed a large number of “international codes” which will replace existing building codes across the United States. They may seem harmless, but in fact they have been rewritten to include Agenda 21 objectives and penalties. A Code Official can deem your house or your land harmful and fine you, jail you, and banish you from the premises, all without due cause or process. As you read this, the U.N. is working on regulations that will interfere with your family size, your property, the way your home is built, and how you commute to work. The best advertisement against Agenda 21 can be found in the words of the document itself and its supporters:

■Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced… ” Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet (Earthpress, 1993)

■“No one fully understands how or even, if, sustainable development can be achieved; however, there is growing consensus that it must be accomplished at the local level if it is ever to be achieved on a global basis.” The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide, published by ICLEI, 1996.

■“Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective.” Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chairman, ICLEI. The Wildlands Project

■"The root causes of the loss of biodiversity are embedded in the way societies use resources. This world view is characteristic of large scale societies…it is a world view that is characterized by the denial of sacred attributes in nature, a characteristic that became firmly established about 2000 years ago with the Judeo-Christian-Islamic religious traditions.” (Global Biodiversity by the UN Environmental Programme)

■“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy- fixated groups… This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” J. Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development.

Agenda 21 is hiding in plain sight. Its mission is clear. Your help is needed immediately to bring their agenda to the forefront and get Americans involved. Share this message, and fax Congress. As proud citizens of this great nation, we must fight for our Constitution and remind our leaders to do the same.

http://www.conservative-daily.com/20...te-change-lie/

Larson on the UN’s Agenda 21 and ‘reclaiming the Earth from humanity’ [VIDEO]

12:12 AM 05/02/2013

In the fifth part of his exclusive interview with the Daily Caller, talk radio host Lars Larson discussed the issues of government overreach on a local level and how it actually impacts the lives of people.

Larson is a resident of the Pacific Northwest, where logging has always been a vital part of the local economy. He criticized the implementation of Agenda 21 — the non-binding action plan put together by the United Nations regarding sustainable development.

“Local governments in the Pacific Northwest where I live will say. ‘We need to buy these lands and preserve them.’ In many cases they are telling the public ‘We need hundreds of millions of dollars… to buy land, that is then going to be maintained at your expense, and owned by you, but you won’t be allowed on it, not even to take a walk with your dog or to look at the birds.’ It is literally denied to people. Because ‘we need to follow the UN’s agenda for reclaiming the Earth from humanity.’”

http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/02/la...#ixzz2SARZXWPh

You can also catch up with any of the earlier parts of Larson’s interview you may have missed:

‘When Michael Moore gets sick, Michael Moore should go get his treatment in Cuba’ http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/01/la...#ixzz2S5c6ClJn

‘Pelosi Rule’ at work in 1000 page immigration bill http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/30/la...on-bill-video/

Media will ignore Gosnell trial since it violates liberal narratives http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/28/la...#ixzz2RsUDrbeV

Obama told false story about Benghazi and he knew it http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/28/ra...#ixzz2RsTxYjhY

Listen carefully ....

Obama Admin Plans To 'Force' Americans To Move Into Cities
"Redistributing" the Wealth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU9mdk1JPSE

Barack Obama’s science advisor John Holdren advocates a “program of sterilizing women after their second or third child.” And this could be accomplished, he proposes, by “the development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired…The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

How far can you be nudged?
Posted on August 6 2013



Dear Patriotic Ladies & Gentlemen,

We regret to inform you that you have been targeted for extinction. The United Nations has decided that you and your offspring are a threat to Mother Earth, and you must be terminated. Those of you who are mercifully still allowed to live will have to relocate to a designated zone, and you will only be allowed to travel within the corridors outlined by the United Nations, as depicted on the above map.

This is for the good of the Earth, and you must put aside all individual choice and thought and go along with what the experts have deemed necessary in order to save our planet.

Agenda 21’s manual proclaims that:

Global warming, the depletion of fuel, water, food, and the like, is the direct cause of human intervention. The real enemy is humanity itself. The damage people cause the planet is a function of demographics equal to the degree of development. The ecological crisis was really the population crisis. Cut the population by ninety-plus percent and you stop injuring the earth by an equal amount.”

Agenda 21 is a threat to humanity, freedom and our Constitution. You may recall Conservative Daily has run a series of articles on Agenda 21 and its indoctrination program known as Common Core, but never have we connected all the dots so definitively for you. The more we research this, the more frightened we become.

The premise is this: “Sustainability” proponents believe that the Earth is under an imminent threat from humans, and therefore humanity must be controlled, limited and ultimately eliminated. The United States of America and other Westernized nations are considered especially dangerous, because our technology, our lifestyles and our free choice consume resources that radical environmentalists believe should only be used by animals and nature.

Agenda 21 lists the following as NOT sustainable: Ski runs, grazing of livestock, plowing of soil, building fences, industry, single family homes, paved and tarred roads, logging activities, dams and reservoirs, power line construction, and economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment.

In their own words, these radical “new thinkers” tell you everything you need to know about their agenda. Pay close attention:

Dave Foreman, Co-Founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.”

Roger Martin, environmental activist, “Fewer people mean better lives.”

Professor Philip Cafaro of Colorado State University, “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change.”

Thomas Ferguson, former State Department official: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…”

But how can they assure that humans are wiped out?

Hello, Obamacare death panels. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner said, “We need death panels…until we start allocating health care resources more prudently—rationing, by its proper name—the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.”

Barack Obama’s science advisor John Holdren advocates a “program of sterilizing women after their second or third child.” And this could be accomplished, he proposes, by “the development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired…The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

Is it adding up for you yet? Are you beginning to see how the dots are connected?

Rahm Emanuel’s brother Dr. Ezekial Emanuel received 2009 stimulus funds for his research council. Emanuel is a huge proponent of rationing care for the elderly and disabled. Obama advisor Cass Sunstein is known for his advocacy of human euthanasia and argues that human life varies in value. Science czar John Holdren states in his book Ecoscience, “To provide a high quality of life for all, there must be fewer people.”

These are the people the President of the United States surrounds himself with, because he agrees with their views and admires their philosophies.

Think of how fondly the Democrats praise Planned Parenthood, how Obama thanks them for doing great work. The world is prepared to KILL OUR CHILDREN if it means the poor, fragile Mother Earth would live to see another minute.

Listen to what a couple of medical ethicists from Oxford University have to say about killing off our population (the word ethics being associated with any of these views is simply appalling): “…what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be.”


This is the true war on women. Agenda 21 must be exposed in every city in America and stopped, before it is too late to turn back. Send a message now and end this radical and dangerous plan.

The problem with all this anxiety over population control is that it’s not necessary: the population is not exploding at alarming levels; birth rates are on the decline. But as Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace says, “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.”

Slate.com ran an article in January of this year reporting, “according to experts’ best estimates, the total population of Earth will stop growing within the lifespan of people alive today. And then it will fall. This is a counterintuitive notion in the United States, where we’ve heard often and loudly that world population growth is a perilous and perhaps unavoidable threat to our future as a species.”

The article goes on to note that “population decline is a very familiar concept in the rest of the developed world, where fertility has long since fallen far below the 2.1 live births per woman required to maintain population equilibrium.”

Germany, Spain, Western Europe, Russia, and China…all the numbers suggest a declining population, in some places by as much as HALF.

But, this information is inconvenient. Sustainability is the back door through which socialism will take over. And who will administer all this humanitarian justice? The enlightened elitists, of course. James Lovelock told the UK’s Guardian, “Democracy must be put on hold” in order to fight global warming and only “a few people with authority” should rule the Earth until we get this crisis under control.”

Professor Maurice King believes that, “Global sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”

You mean nothing to these elitists, who believe that “human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs” – that is from John Davis, of the Earth First Journal.

On August 13th Obama is scheduled to give a speech asking for MORE TAXPAYER MONEY to combat climate control.

In essence, he is asking you to sign your own death warrant.

And in case you don’t see the full picture Obama and the globalists are trying to paint for you, you soon will. Obama is hiring a "Behavioral Insights Team" that will look for ways to subtly influence your behavior. This “nudge” program is based on a similar project implemented in England, where people were encouraged to sign up for retirement benefits, or insulate their homes better. It is based on a 2008 book by Obama’s buddy Cass Sunstein, who we told you above argues strongly for human euthanasia.

As a proud American citizen, you should be very frightened right now to see the big picture of what is happening. The environmentalists have taken over the nation’s discourse and are infiltrating our schools as we speak with the educational program known as Common Core. We are all going to be conditioned to believe as Reed Noss of the Wildlands Project that, “The native ecosystems and the collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans.”

Once the humans are contained, confined, and many of them starved off or aborted, the birds and bees and trees can live harmoniously and all will be right with the planet.

http://www.conservative-daily.com/20...you-be-nudged/

See also http://www.bigbigforums.com/news-inf...an-treaty.html

Bill Gates Says Life Would Be Much Easier With A World Government
John Vibes
February 24, 2014

(ANTIMEDIA) In a recent interview with the German publication “Süddeutsche Zeitung“, Bill Gates made some disturbing comments in favor of world government. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wirtschaf...wahr-1.2324164

Not only did Gates advocate global government, but he also spoke favorably of the UN and NATO, completely overlooking that they are a major force of oppression in the world. NATO can’t even hold a meeting without thousands of people gathering in the streets to protest their actions. Someone as heavily involved in world affairs as Bill Gates should know all about this.

During the interview last month, Gates said, https://translate.google.at/translat...any&edit-text=

“Take the UN, it has been created especially for the security in the world. We are ready for war, because we have taken every precaution. We have NATO, we have divisions, jeeps, trained people. But what is with epidemics? How many doctors do we have as much planes, tents, what scientists? If there were such a thing as a world government, we would be better prepared. “

Not long ago this subject was considered a total conspiracy theory, but now one of the richest people in the world is openly suggesting that this is a good idea. Governments are generally a pretty bad idea, even when they are small they can still do a tremendous amount of damage. So when a government rules the entire planet, there is no telling what type of atrocities it will be capable of.

http://theantimedia.org/bill-gates-s...ld-government/