View Poll Results: Do you think lethal injection inhumane ?
- Voters
- 75. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes - absolutely.
7 9.33% -
No - far kinder then other options
47 62.67% -
Depends on the circumstances
7 9.33% -
Who Cares ?
14 18.67%
-
04-07-2008, 02:27 PM #1
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Location
- Lan astaslem !
- Posts
- 60,656
- Thanks
- 2,750
- Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
DP ? - is lethal injection inhumane ?
Doctor: Ohio's lethal injection inhumane
By JOE MILICIA, Associated Press Writer
30 minutes ago
ELYRIA, Ohio - An anesthesiologist testified Monday that Ohio's lethal injection procedure isn't appropriate for dogs or cats, let alone humans.
Dr. Mark Heath's testimony on behalf of two murder defendants came in a Lorain County hearing on the constitutionality of state's method for putting prisoners to death.
Heath, an assistant professor of anesthesiology at Columbia University, says it's possible to perform lethal injection of prisoners in a humane manner, but that Ohio's method falls below the standard for euthanizing household pets.
Ohio requires its executions to be carried out "in a professional, humane, sensitive and dignified manner." The two men facing murder charges say the state's lethal injection procedure doesn't give the quick and painless deaths required by state law.
Lethal injections are on hold nationally while the U.S. Supreme Court considers a challenge in a case from Kentucky, which is among the roughly three dozen states that administer three drugs in succession to sedate, paralyze and kill prisoners.
The major criticism of the three-drug execution procedure is that if the executioner administers too little anesthetic or makes mistakes in injecting it, the inmate could suffer excruciating pain from the other two drugs.
Difficulties with two executions in recent years, in which the execution team struggled to find suitable veins in inmates' arms, brought complaints that the method is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual. Ohio officials stand by the procedure.
Heath testified on behalf of defendants Ronald McCloud and Ruben Rivera, who are accused of separate murders and could receive death sentences if convicted.
The state was expected to counter with expert witness Dr. Mark Dershwitz, an anesthesiologist from Massachusetts, who will testify via video conference Tuesday.
Ohio has executed 26 inmates since it resumed putting prisoners to death in 1999.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080407/...D4BJSVelZH2ocALaissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?
-
04-07-2008 02:27 PM # ADS
-
04-07-2008, 02:54 PM #2
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Whitney, TX
- Posts
- 1,721
- Thanks
- 1,861
- Thanked 880 Times in 251 Posts
I think lethal injection is much more humane than the alternatives. However, I'm not a fan of the death penalty. Even with my history it's not something I can fully stand behind. I'm not totally against it either. I have a hard time with the death penalty.
Now if it's decided on no LI, that's it's too inhumane, what will come next? I don't think the death penalty will ever be abolished in this country. There will be always another way thought up so that death sentences can be carried out.
-
04-07-2008, 03:02 PM #3
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Orlando, Florida
- Posts
- 3,948
- Thanks
- 2,350
- Thanked 1,185 Times in 837 Posts
I would be glad to do away with lethal injections, electric chair & all other methods of "legal" death penalties if we could just kill them off they way they killed their victims. Sorry but I do not believe that they have more rights than the people they harmed/killed/maimed. JMHO
-
04-07-2008, 03:48 PM #4
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Posts
- 5,185
- Thanks
- 86
- Thanked 852 Times in 390 Posts
I agree. Lethal injection is much more humane than how the victims died.
Me
-
04-07-2008, 03:51 PM #5
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Everyone should have the right to be treated equal no matter what
- Posts
- 8,411
- Thanks
- 631
- Thanked 983 Times in 578 Posts
I agree. I used to be against the death penalty but not anymore. If they can prove w/o a doubt that the person being sentanced did said crime, they should go out the way their victim did. Why should they get "a professional, humane, sensitive and dignified manner"when their victims did not
If you don't want dumb answers, don't ask dumb questions
-
04-07-2008, 04:46 PM #6
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Location
- Innsmouth (look it up)
- Posts
- 599
- Thanks
- 662
- Thanked 428 Times in 174 Posts
I could care less about the "Humane" treatment of monsters who rape and kill, molest children etc.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to renaissanceman For This Useful Post:
SHELBYDOG (12-08-2009)
-
04-07-2008, 05:32 PM #7
-
04-07-2008, 05:46 PM #8
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- a look outside
- Posts
- 17,565
- Thanks
- 2,792
- Thanked 2,402 Times in 1,084 Posts
These people who are on death row are there for a reason, the took a life (s) I would say an eye for an eye..lethal injection is by far easier on them then the deaths they caused. We could starve them to death and save lots of $$ at the same time. There's always a fireing squad or death by hanging.
I voted "who care's"
-
04-07-2008, 05:51 PM #9
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- It is in God's hands now
- Posts
- 14,876
- Thanks
- 709
- Thanked 646 Times in 453 Posts
I think it is more inhumane for the victim's family......... let them get justice the old fashioned way
Mom I miss you already
January 16, 1940 to April 29, 2009
-
04-07-2008, 07:47 PM #10
-
04-07-2008, 08:28 PM #11