martial law?

[Jolie Rouge]

SEAL Veteran: Military Leaders Being Asked if They Will Disarm Americans...
October 24, 2013

(PAUL JOSEPH WATSON) -- Former Navy SEAL Ben Smith warns that the Obama administration is asking top brass in the military if they would be comfortable with disarming U.S. citizens, a litmus test that includes gauging whether they would be prepared to order NCOs to fire on Americans.

Smith provoked headlines last week when he appeared on Fox News to assert that the federal government was trying to provoke veterans into violence as an excuse to implement martial law.

Speaking exclusively to the Alex Jones Show, Smith stated, “Going back to the beginning of this administration, I’ve had friends within the community talking about how they were brought in and questioned with people from more towards the top side and the questioning….where it was pointing was do you feel comfortable disarming American citizens,” adding that this was one of the many “funny things” occurring within the military.

When Smith was asked by radio host Alex Jones if this line of questioning included a litmus test whereby military officers were asked if they would fire on U.S. citizens, he responded in the affirmative.

Smith said the litmus test was related to the recent firing of top military commanders Navy Vice Adm. Tim Giardina and Maj. Gen. Michael Carey.

Smith linked the premise to former Obama advisor Van Jones, who was forced to resign in September 2009 after his links with a Marxist organization were revealed.

“You drop the radical pose for the radical ends,” said Smith, paraphrasing Van Jones.

The idea of U.S. soldiers being asked if they will fire on American citizens during a crisis or mass disarmament program has emerged from several different sources over the last two decades.

In January, 2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow claimed he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens.

Concerns over U.S. troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of mass gun confiscation first arose in May 1994 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”

The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone of the question. Read more via Infowars... http://www.infowars.com/ex-navy-seal-military-leaders-being-asked-if-they-will-disarm-americans/


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Kpsp0BVfcXw


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Kpsp0BVfcXw

Smith provoked headlines last week when he appeared on Fox News to assert that the federal government was trying to provoke veterans into violence as an excuse to implement martial law.

Speaking exclusively to the Alex Jones Show, Smith stated, “Going back to the beginning of this administration, I’ve had friends within the community talking about how they were brought in and questioned with people from more towards the top side and the questioning….where it was pointing was do you feel comfortable disarming American citizens,” adding that this was one of the many “funny things” occurring within the military.

When Smith was asked by radio host Alex Jones if this line of questioning included a litmus test whereby military officers were asked if they would fire on U.S. citizens, he responded in the affirmative.

Smith said the litmus test was related to the recent firing of top military commanders Navy Vice Adm. Tim Giardina and Maj. Gen. Michael Carey.

Smith linked the premise to former Obama advisor Van Jones, who was forced to resign in September 2009 after his links with a Marxist organization were revealed. “You drop the radical pose for the radical ends,” said Smith, paraphrasing Van Jones.

The idea of U.S. soldiers being asked if they will fire on American citizens during a crisis or mass disarmament program has emerged from several different sources over the last two decades.

In January, 2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow claimed he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens.

Concerns over U.S. troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of mass gun confiscation first arose in May 1994 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”

[Jolie Rouge]

This is bigger and way beyond the current administration

The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone of the question.

http://www.29palmssurvey.com/survey.html

Below is the a copy of the actual survey that Lt. Cmd. Ernest Guy Cunningham gave on May 10, 1994 at 29 Palms Naval Base in California.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


COMBAT ARMS SURVEY

This questionnaire is to gather data concerning the attitudes of combat trained personnel with regard to nontraditional missions. All of your responses are confidential. Write your answers directly on the questionnaire form. In Part II, place an "X" in the space provided for your response.


Part I. Demographics
1.What Service are you in?
2.What is your pay grade? (e.g. E-?, 0-?)
3.What is your MOS code and description?
4.What is your highest level of education in years?
5.How many months did you serve in Operation Desert Storm/Desert Shield?
6. How many months did you serve in Somalia?
7.What state or country did you primarily reside in during childhood?

Part ll. Attitudes

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops should be used within the United States for any of the following missions?

8. Drug enforcement

9. Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)

10. Security at national events (e.g. Olympic Games, Super Bowl)

11. Environmental disaster clean-up

12.Substitute teachers in public schools

13. Community assistance programs (e.g. landscaping, environmental clean-up, road repair, animal control)

14.Federal and state prison guards

15.National emergency police force

16. Advisors to S.W.A.T units, the FBI, or the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (B.A.T. F. )

17.Border patrol (e. g. prevention of illegal aliens into U.S. territory. )

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops under U.S. command should be used in other countries for any of the following United Nations missions?

18. Drug enforcement

19.Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)

20. Environmental disaster clean-up

21. Peace keeping

22. Nation building (Reconstruct civil government, develop public school system, develop or improve public transportation system, etc.)

23. Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical supplies, temporary housing, and clothing)

Do you feel that U.S. combat troops should be used in other countries under command of non-U.S. officers appointed by the United Nations for any of the following missions?
24. Drug enforcement

25.Disaster relief (e.g. hurricanes, floods, fires, earthquakes)

26.Environmental disaster clean-up

27.Peace Keeping

28. Nation building (Reconstruct civil government, develop public school system, develop or improve public transportation system, etc.)

29.Humanitarian relief (e.g. food and medical supplies, temporary housing, and clothing)

30. Police Action (e.g. Korea, Vietnam, but serving under non-U.S. officers)

Consider the following statements:
31. The U.S. runs a field training exercise. U.N. combat troops should be allowed to setve in U.S. combat units during these exercises under U.S. command and control.

32.The United Nations runs a field training exercise. U.S. combat troops under U.S. command and control should setve in U.N. combat units during these exercises.

33.The United Nations runs a field training exercise. U.S. combat troops should serve under U.N. command and control during these exercises.

34.U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. missions as long as the U.S. has full command and control.

35. U.S. combat troops should participate in U.N. missions under United Nations command and control.

36. U.S. combat troops should be commanded by U.N. officers and non-commissioned officers (NCOs) at battalion and company levels while performing U.N. missions.

37. It would make no difference to me to have U.N. soldiers as members of my team. (e.g. fire team, squad, platoon)

38.It would make no difference to me to take orders from a U.N. company commander.

39.I feel the President of the United States has the authority to pass his responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief to the U.N. Secretary General.

40. I feel there is no conflict between my oath of office and serving as a U.N. soldier.

41. I feel my unit's combat effectiveness would not be affected by performing humanitarian missions for the United Nations.

42. I feel a designated unit of U.S. combat soldiers should be permanently assigned to the command and control of the United Nations.

43.I would be willing to volunteer for assignment to a U.S. combat unit under a U.N. commander.

44. I would like U.N. member countries, including the U.S., to give the U.N. all the soldiers necessary to maintain world peace.

I would swear to the following code:
"I am a United Nations fighting person. I serve in the forces which maintain world peace and every nation's way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense."

45. The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to tum over their firearms. Consider the following statement:

I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government


http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/seal-veteran-military-leaders-being-asked-if-they-will-disarm-americans

[Jolie Rouge]

This is incredible. Last month at a town hall meeting a Marine stood up and told John McCain [to his face] that he should be tried for treason. John McCain's response was less than satisfying... Wonder why this wasn't covered by MSM ???

Click here to watch-->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=F5TSmkOEijI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=F5TSmkOEijI

http://www.kprcradio.com/pages/waltonandjohnson.html?article=11765828

[Jolie Rouge]

Democrat Sheila Jackson Lee calls for Martial Law on the House floor.
Posted 10.09.13 by Jennifer Burke

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) is not known for being the sharpest tool in the shed. She has said some pretty outrageous things in the past, most recently referring to herself as a ‘freed slave’. She’s also known for being a far left, Obama defending, Progressive hack. In addition, she came under fire for her atrocious treatment of her staff which led some to deem her the ‘boss from hell’. But, none of this compares to what Jackson Lee said on the floor of the House on Monday.

While speaking on the floor of the House about the partial government shutdown, Sheila Jackson Lee made a curious and disturbing statement.

It is not the truth to suggest that there are not enough voters, members of Congress, that would vote right now today to open this government. It’s something called a continuing resolution, but it’s a bill that you put on the floor that has been passed by Republicans and Democrats in the United States Senate. This is not an idea of anyone over another person. Republican and Democratic senators have already voted for this ‘clean bill’ that we could vote on today. We have martial law. What that means, and my colleagues know what it means is that you can put a bill on in just minutes.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qzvViJyPBvc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qzvViJyPBvc

Did Sheila Jackson Lee just change the meaning of the words ‘martial law’ or was she overtly and coyly giving Obama a message of what she believes he should do to deal with Republicans? Does she want Obama to increase his ‘Campaign of Pain’ against the American people?

Martial law has absolutely nothing to do with the process of making a bill a law. It specifically relates to the suspension of habeas corpus where Americans can be imprisoned without a hearing and where military forces are used against the people. The fact that we have witnessed numerous incidents of police being used to intimidate, block, and, in some cases, hold innocent Americans under armed guard during Barack Obama’s ‘Campaign of Pain’ against the American people makes this call for martial law by Sheila Jackson Lee all the more disturbing.

http://teapartyheadlines.streamshare.com/posts/7833

[Jolie Rouge]

https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1394071_590654147636628_654818238_n.jpg

[Jolie Rouge]

Remember the Bush Administration ??

Then "Dissent is patriotic"

Now it is considered treason - sedition

https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/p320x320/1395209_605587859496703_1150423665_n.png