PDA

View Full Version : Obama plan for spotted owl targets rival bird



Jolie Rouge
02-29-2012, 05:36 PM
By JEFF BARNARD and MATTHEW DALY | Associated Press – Tue, Feb 28, 2012

WASHINGTON (AP) — To save the imperiled spotted owl, the Obama administration is moving forward with a controversial plan to shoot barred owls, a rival bird that has shoved its smaller cousin aside.

The plan is the latest federal attempt to protect the northern spotted owl, the passive, one-pound bird that sparked an epic battle over logging in the Pacific Northwest two decades ago. The government set aside millions of acres of forest to protect the owl, but the bird's population continues to decline — a 40 percent slide in 25 years.

A plan announced Tuesday would designate habitat considered critical for the bird's survival, while allowing logging to reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire and to create jobs. Habitat loss and competition from barred owls are the biggest threats to the spotted owl.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar called the draft plan "a science-based approach to forestry that restores the health of our lands and wildlife and supports jobs and revenue for local communities."

By removing selected barred owls and better managing forests, officials can give communities, foresters and land managers in three states important tools to promote healthier and more productive forests, Salazar said.

The new plan, which replaces a 2008 Bush administration plan that was tossed out in federal court, affects millions of acres of national, state and private forest land in Washington, Oregon and Northern California.

The plan to kill barred owls would not be the first time the federal government has authorized killing of one species to help another. California sea lions that feast on threatened salmon in the Columbia River have been killed in recent years after efforts to chase them away or scare them failed.

The U.S. Agriculture Department kills thousands of wild animals each year — mostly predators such as coyotes — to protect livestock. Other animals, including bears, wolves and raccoons also are killed through the program.

The latest plan for spotted owls was accompanied by a presidential memorandum directing Interior to take a number of steps before the plan is finalized, including providing clear direction for how logging can be conducted within areas designated as critical habitat and conducting an economic analysis at the same time critical habitat areas are proposed.

Officials acknowledge that the plan to kill barred owls creates an ethical dilemma, but say an experiment on private land in northern California has shown promising results. Spotted owls have returned to historic territories after barred owls were removed.

Salazar and other officials stressed the new plan's job-creation component, noting that for the first time logging would be allowed in areas designated as critical habitat for the owl. Previous plans had prohibited logging in areas designated as critical habitat. "Appropriate timber harvests consistent with ecological forestry principles (should) be encouraged," the Interior Department said in a statement.

The American Forest Resource Council, a timber industry group, was skeptical that so-called ecological logging would produce a significant amount of timber or jobs. At the same time, the plan has the potential to double the amount of acres designated as critical habitat, said Tom Partin, the group's president. "Habitat is not the current limiting factor for the northern spotted owl, nor is historic loss of old-growth" trees, Partin said. "In fact, the amount of old growth on our federal forests is increasing while the spotted owl's numbers are decreasing."

Conservationists also were wary. Steve Holmer of the American Bird Conservancy said his group was pleased that the administration was moving carefully to kill barred owls, but said officials appeared to be endorsing a big boost in logging inside critical habitat boundaries with no scientific studies showing it works.

The federal government has been trying to find a balance between logging and fish and wildlife habitat since at least the late 1980s. The spotted owl was designated as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 1990 — an action that led to massive logging cutbacks on national forests and other federal lands in western Washington, Oregon and Northern California. The bird was blamed for the loss of tens of thousands of jobs and landed on the cover of Time magazine.

Despite federal efforts to protect it, the spotted owl continues to decline. A key reason is the barred owl, a larger, more aggressive East Coast cousin that has displaced spotted owls through much of their historic range.

Just how many barred owls would be killed and where remains undecided, although officials said hundreds of birds are likely to be killed with shotguns. The plan also calls for non-lethal removal of the barred owls, by capturing them and relocating them or placing in them in permanent captivity. "We can't ignore the mounting evidence that competition from barred owls is a major factor in the spotted owl's decline, and we have a clear obligation to do all we can to prevent the spotted owl's extinction and help it rebound," said Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe.

Eric Forsman, a U.S. Forest Service scientist whose work in the 1970s showed how the decline in spotted owls was tied to logging old-growth forests, was skeptical that killing barred owls would make a difference. "There are not enough shotguns," he said. "It would be just about like trying to wipe out coyotes."

The Interior Department will accept public comments on the plan for 90 days.

___

Barnard reported from Grants Pass, Ore.

___

Twitter: (at)MatthewDalyWDC and (at)jeffbarnardap

http://news.yahoo.com/obama-plan-spotted-owl-targets-rival-bird-232139541.html

comments

Selective homicide--what a concept! Kill one species to save another, brilliant! Rejoice Jimmy Carter, you keep getting pushed up the ladder and can no longer hold the title for worst.

...

The spotted owl issue was an assault on the timber industry that was successful. Part of my work included calling spotted owls in the late 1970s and early 80s. We found them in many places that cannot be considered "old growth timber". I found one nesting pair that was using a tanoak tree for their nest, but my counterparts refused to even go look, since it was "impossible".

...

hmm..
so natures already filling the void that our meddling made;and your answer is to kill off those that nature selected ... we never learn

...

What a genius. Have you ever tried to find a large number of owls in daylight? What are we going to do send the national gaurd out with night vision equipment? And this is what he took time off from campaigning to accomplish?

...

Obama has the same type of plan for the Middle Class.

...

This is why we gave up the Timber Business in the Northwest. And yet still they die. What ever happened to Natural Selection. Do we have the money for feel good projects like this??

...

A liberal wanting to use guns???? say it isnt so...

Jolie Rouge
11-28-2012, 12:22 PM
Obama the Job-Killing Owl-Killer
By Michelle Malkin • November 28, 2012 09:20 AM

http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ZZ53691894.jpg

Welcome to the pretzel logic of liberal environmental protection: In order to “save” owls, the Obama administration is going to shoot them dead.

This is not — I repeat not — an Onion parody.

Over the Thanksgiving holiday, the White House released a big fat policy turkey: its final critical habitat rule for the endangered northern spotted owl. The Obama plan will lock up 9.6 million acres of land http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2019735260_spottedowl22.html (mostly, but not all, federal) in Oregon, Washington and northern California. This is nearly double the acreage set aside by the Bush administration. Thousands of timber workers (along with untold thousands of related support jobs) will be threatened in the name of sparing a few thousand spotted owls from extinction.

As House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings, R-Wash., pointed out earlier this year, timber-dependent counties hit hard by the federal land grab and unending environmental litigation remain racked by high unemployment. “The loss in economic activity caused by the original spotted owl plan caused an astounding decrease in federal tax receipts of nearly $700 million per year — all from rural Northwest communities.” http://hastings.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=299151

Despite two decades of massive government intervention and the near-destruction of the northwest timber industry, the furry bird is vanishing faster than ever. According to the Smithsonian Magazine, “(t)imber harvest on 24 million acres of federal land had dropped 90 percent from its heyday” by the year 2000. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/The-Spotted-Owls-New-Nemesis.html?c=y&page=1 Yet, northern spotted owls are now “disappearing three times faster than biologists had feared.” Indeed, spotted owl populations in key parts of Washington State “are half what they were in the 1980s.” And overall, the bird has seen a 40 percent decline over the past 25 years, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.fws.gov/pacific/news/news.cfm?id=2144375150

Punishing loggers and bringing the timber industry to its knees have made vengeful environmental groups fat and happy. But the northern spotted owl they claim to care so much about is catastrophically worse off thanks to green zealotry. One root cause: habitat loss (thanks in part to raging wildfires resulting from poor forest management and green opposition to thinning/controlled burns).

The other major, nonhuman culprit: the barred owl. http://www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/Species/Data/NorthernSpottedOwl/BarredOwl/default.asp

These barred owls began migrating from the East Coast in the 1950s, and the USFWS reports that the larger, more aggressive and more adaptable birds “are known to displace spotted owls, disrupt their nesting and compete with them for food.” Barred owls are more prolific breeders, less finicky about their food and less picky about where they live. They also don’t bow down before the Endangered Species Act or the hallowed “threatened” status of its weaker brethren. They are brutal predators known to slam into spotted owls, slicing them with their talons and decapitating them in their nests.

Conservation groups whine that barred owls are victims of “scapegoating.” But USFWS Director Dan Ashe spoke the truth earlier this year: “We can’t ignore the mounting evidence that competition from barred owls is a major factor in the spotted owl’s decline.”
http://news.discovery.com/earth/battle-barred-owls-to-save-the-spotted-owl-120302.html

Instead of admitting failure and letting nature take its course, however, command-and-control bureaucrats have appointed themselves Mother Nature’s judges, juries and executioners. Their “main priority” is “reducing competition from barred owls.” How? By gunning them down. http://www.conservativeblog.org/amyridenour/2012/3/1/occupy-occupy-dc-day-13-end-the-war-on-owls.html Final details are still in the works, but the agency has floated past removal schemes that involve “luring territorial barred owls into close range … using recorded calls and an owl decoy. … A shotgun would be used to prevent wounding and ensure rapid and humane death.” Experts say such an eradication plan would need to continue for centuries. http://www.hcn.org/issues/40.14/conservation-quandary/article_view?b_start:int=2&-C=

Twenty years of regulatory salvation have failed the northern spotted owl. Who believes that another top-down government exercise in species engineering — this time backed with bullets — will do the trick? When the government picks winners and losers, taxpayers always get screwed. No matter the job losses. No matter the death toll. Arrogant and unaccountable central planners never give a hoot.

http://michellemalkin.com/2012/11/28/obama-the-job-killing-owl-killer/

comments



This is not — I repeat not — an Onion parody.

How sad when dealing w/ this administration you’re forced to include that disclaimer. They provide enough comic relief without our playing up the laughs. You just can’t make this stuff up.



A shotgun would be used to prevent wounding and ensure rapid and humane death.

Looks like some good overtime hours coming up for the TSA.



Twenty years of regulatory salvation have failed the northern spotted owl. Who believes that another top-down government exercise in species engineering — this time backed with bullets — will do the trick?

After coming off active duty in 1989, we moved to ( of all places ) Molalla, OR to help w/ aging parents. The economic devastation wrought upon that once proud logging community was beyond estimation.

Safety nets weren’t what they are today and our daughters had little classmates that lived in station wagons. What followed was even worse. A town long known for its rowdy mill workers swarming bars the minute their shift was over.., switched to dealing drugs.

It got so bad in fact Dad once quipped users from Portland came out ‘here’ to score dope! It’s taken these people the last 20+ years to get on their feet and now, only (1) of the seven operational mills exists. The drugs stayed.

...

How ironic that the EPA thinks they are saving the spotted owl and all this time it was actually providing more habitat for the predator that kills the spotted owls. I would laugh, but it is just sad how midguided these people are!! Meanwhile, they “save” “endangered” species and destroy the humans. Their priorities are a bit skewed, to put it tactfully. To put it a bit less tactfully, these morons are killing us!! Time to wage a major protest against the EPA. MAJOR! How long will the American people allow this corrupt government agency hold this country hostage? How many more lives will they destroy before they are stopped?

..

Yet BO signed a bill to allow the round- up of wild horses for the sale of horse eat to Europeans? Double standard here? Or are owls more important than horses (or other species)?

..

Aren’t these the same people who espouse evolution at every turn? Yet here they are trying to defeat it.

..

As long as we don’t harm any wildlife, we can destroy the lives of citizens and steal their property.