PDA

View Full Version : Just in time for Earth Day



Jolie Rouge
04-15-2010, 09:40 AM
[b]A 2nd garbage patch: Plastic soup seen in Atlantic
By MIKE MELIA, Associated Press Writer Mike Melia, Associated Press Writer Thu Apr 15, 5:30 am ET
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – Researchers are warning of a new blight on the ocean: a swirl of confetti-like plastic debris stretching over thousands of square miles (kilometers) in a remote expanse of the Atlantic Ocean.

The floating garbage — hard to spot from the surface and spun together by a vortex of currents — was documented by two groups of scientists who trawled the sea between scenic Bermuda and Portugal's mid-Atlantic Azores islands.

The studies describe a soup of micro-particles similar to the so-called Great Pacific Garbage Patch, a phenomenon discovered a decade ago between Hawaii and California that researchers say is likely to exist in other places around the globe. "We found the great Atlantic garbage patch," said Anna Cummins, who collected plastic samples on a sailing voyage in February.

The debris is harmful for fish, sea mammals — and at the top of the food chain, potentially humans — even though much of the plastic has broken into such tiny pieces they are nearly invisible.

Since there is no realistic way of cleaning the oceans, advocates say the key is to keep more plastic out by raising awareness and, wherever possible, challenging a throwaway culture that uses non-biodegradable materials for disposable products. "Our job now is to let people know that plastic ocean pollution is a global problem — it unfortunately is not confined to a single patch," Cummins said.

The research teams presented their findings in February at the 2010 Oceans Sciences Meeting in Portland, Oregon. While scientists have reported finding plastic in parts of the Atlantic since the 1970s, the researchers say they have taken important steps toward mapping the extent of the pollution.

Cummins and her husband, Marcus Eriksen, of Santa Monica, California, sailed across the Atlantic for their research project. They plan similar studies in the South Atlantic in November and the South Pacific next spring.

On the voyage from Bermuda to the Azores, they crossed the Sargasso Sea, an area bounded by ocean currents including the Gulf Stream. They took samples every 100 miles (160 kilometers) with one interruption caused by a major storm. Each time they pulled up the trawl, it was full of plastic.

A separate study by undergraduates with the Woods Hole, Massachusetts-based Sea Education Association collected more than 6,000 samples on trips between Canada and the Caribbean over two decades. The lead investigator, Kara Lavendar Law, said they found the highest concentrations of plastics between 22 and 38 degrees north latitude, an offshore patch equivalent to the area between roughly Cuba and Washington, D.C.

Long trails of seaweed, mixed with bottles, crates and other flotsam, drift in the still waters of the area, known as the North Atlantic Subtropical Convergence Zone. Cummins' team even netted a Trigger fish trapped alive inside a plastic bucket.

But the most nettlesome trash is nearly invisible: countless specks of plastic, often smaller than pencil erasers, suspended near the surface of the deep blue Atlantic. "It's shocking to see it firsthand," Cummins said. "Nothing compares to being out there. We've managed to leave our footprint really everywhere."

Still more data are needed to assess the dimensions of the North Atlantic patch. Charles Moore, an ocean researcher credited with discovering the Pacific garbage patch in 1997, said the Atlantic undoubtedly has comparable amounts of plastic. The east coast of the United States has more people and more rivers to funnel garbage into the sea. But since the Atlantic is stormier, debris there likely is more diffuse, he said.

Whatever the difference between the two regions, plastics are devastating the environment across the world, said Moore, whose Algalita Marine Research Foundation based in Long Beach, California, was among the sponsors for Cummins and Eriksen. "Humanity's plastic footprint is probably more dangerous than its carbon footprint," he said.

Plastics have entangled birds and turned up in the bellies of fish: A paper cited by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says as many as 100,000 marine mammals could die trash-related deaths each year.

The plastic bits, which can be impossible for fish to distinguish from plankton, are dangerous in part because they sponge up potentially harmful chemicals that are also circulating in the ocean, said Jacqueline Savitz, a marine scientist at Oceana, an ocean conservation group based in Washington.

As much as 80 percent of marine debris comes from land, according to the United Nations Environmental Program.

The U.S. government is concerned the pollution could hurt its vital interests. "That plastic has the potential to impact our resources and impact our economy," said Lisa DiPinto, acting director of NOAA's marine debris program. "It's great to raise awareness so the public can see the plastics we use can eventually land in the ocean."

DiPinto said the federal agency is co-sponsoring a new voyage this summer by the Sea Education Association to measure plastic pollution southeast of Bermuda. NOAA is also involved in research on the Pacific patch. "Unfortunately, the kinds of things we use plastic for are the kinds of things we don't dispose of carefully," Savitz said. "We've got to use less of it, and if we're going to use it, we have to make sure we dispose of it well."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100415/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/cb_atlantic_ocean_junk


While I would not be surprised to find a big swirling pile of trash from what I have seen on several "Clean It Up" trips, I have to say I find it ... interesting ... on several points. This is found waaaayyyy out in the ocean, the pieces of plastic found are too small to be picked up, they are too small to be seen from the surface, ect ect ect .... In other words .... "Just Trust Us" ??

Jolie Rouge
06-17-2010, 09:56 PM
The other, bigger 'oil spill': Your use of disposable plastic
By Daniella Russo Thu Jun 17, 2:05 pm ET

Carmel Valley, Calif. – As the world has watched the dreadful string of attempts to stanch the flow of oil from its source a mile down in the Gulf of Mexico, it's a good time to consider ways people can make a positive difference in the ocean.

That petroleum bubbling from the seabed is used to make plastic, and, at an alarming rate, that plastic returns to the ocean as pollution.

We've all been watching the BP cam of the broken oil well. But did you know that for quite some time, cameras have logged the swirling gyre in the ocean nicknamed the Pacific Garbage Patch? Did you know that the environmental devastation Atlantic Ocean is not new?

These ocean catastrophes did not begin with a fiery explosion. They began with a disposable cup, just like the cup you likely used at that weekend barbecue. By one estimate, the ocean has already been corrupted by 200 billion pounds of plastic pollution. Other experts estimate that we are now dumping additional billions of pounds of plastic each year.

The number continues to grow, driven by our ever-increasing consumption of things like plastic toothbrushes, toys, and combs, and single-use items like plastic bags, bottles, and straws.

Whatever happened to that mantra "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle"? Today the recycling part of that has taken off somewhat. But is it too little, too late? A placebo, a myth?

We are simply using too much disposable plastic for the small percentage that gets recycled to even make a dent. And, unlike paper, glass, or stainless steel, most plastic can only be "down-cycled," or used for increasingly fewer purposes. All the recycling, like using a teaspoon to empty the ocean, simply can't stem the tide of plastic engulfing us.

Billions of pounds of plastic? That's like a few million cars dumped into the sea every year. Maybe we let it happen because the pounds accumulate not by one-ton car increments but by fractions of an ounce – a straw here, a plastic bag there, an empty shampoo bottle over there. When we're doing it one plastic bottle cap at a time, it's hard to realize that we are turning the ocean into a trash can.

Will an ocean cleanup be effective?

Certainly any effort to clean up our polluted seas is to be applauded, but we should also make sure the work is worth the effort.

In the Gulf of Mexico, the arguably toxic oil-dispersant sprays and containment strategies seem woefully insufficient when barrels of oil churn each day from the source below. Is an ocean cleanup an equally futile effort when we're replacing the garbage that's there more quickly than we could ever scoop it up?

So much of the garbage creating these shameful plastic gyres is single-use disposable plastic.

The most powerful thing people can do to clean up the oceans is to refuse to use "disposable" plastics in the first place. Let's add "Refuse" to the list of R's: Refuse-Reduce-Reuse-Recycle. Until we reduce our use of plastics wherever possible, real change will not happen. Recycling or cleanup projects alone won't cut it.

So what does that mean?

Just say no to single-use plastic

It means that whenever you can, say no to using plastic that will end up in the garbage that same day. Daily life offers countless ways to start saying no – just start with one.

Once a day, refuse to use a plastic bag, a plastic bottle, straws, takeout containers, disposable cups, utensils, or unnecessary packaging. Start there. Phase out the single-use plastics in your life, reuse the ones you already have as much as you can, and then change your habits: Choose reusable products. Take all of your plastic containers to the nearest recycling center and don't replace them.

Then, begin choosing products sold in glass, metal, cardboard, and paper instead of plastic. These materials can be more effectively recycled or, when it's paper, biodegrade in water or landfills.

What about jobs in disposable plastic?

According to the American Chemistry Council (ACC), roughly 1 million people make a living off developing and manufacturing plastic. But reducing plastic pollution doesn't have to mean reducing jobs.

Members of the ACC who develop plastic should keep jobs by developing new, safe, biodegradable alternatives to plastic that do not leach toxins or contaminate the earth as they biodegrade. Plastic manufacturers should have a plan for end-of-life for each of their products and own up to their responsibilities.

Recycling or even reusing alone will not reduce the plastic waste on our planet if we continue to create more and more disposable plastic products every day. As the United States buckles down to months of Gulf oil spill cleanup, we must take advantage of that momentum to save the oceans.

Plastic pollution poses a massive threat to the health of our oceans. If we don't reduce dependence upon and production of single-use plastic alongside that cleanup and recycling, we are engaged in a somewhat Sisyphean task.

Life without plastic pollution is possible. Try it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20100617/cm_csm/307466/print;_ylt=AlMglf444PRQQEmj5h5y1tK7e8UF;_ylu=X3oDM TBycjdqNWs0BHBvcwMxNQRzZWMDYm90dG9tBHNsawNwcmludA--

comments

I love turning it into the four R's. I already point out to people that Recycle is just above throwing things out. It is better, but not by a huge amount. And refuse to take plastic is what I do on a regular basis with a lot of disposable items.
You can't avoid it all but you sure can try. I even go to potlucks with my own plate and fork....... You can also save a chunk of money while you are at it.
There are a ton of things that you buy that you don't need :)


Refuse
Reduce
Reuse
Recycle

----

Bed Bath and Beyond sells a brand of biodegradeable garbage bags in various sizes to fit coordinating metal step-lid trash cans--coupons always in magazines, online and you can get on mailing list to receive coupons. You gotta admit, there ARE some one-time use plastics that none of us would want to give up--medical/dental/technology--do you want a previously used bedpan, catheter, iv/trach tube? And why do cellphones and computers have to age in dog years? Why can't they just be updated/upgraded, kind of like going to a shoe cobbler? My cell service dealer couldn't replace the battery in my "old" phone...apparently 2 years old is "ancient". Tell that to a toddler who can't even dial their phonenumber yet!

---

....that shampoo, liquid soap, conditioner, toothpaste, lotion, and hundreds of other things you mentioned that come in a plastic bottle are themselves made of petrochemicals which have OIL as their base. Like it or not, ours is the age of PETROCHEMICAL MAN. This won't change for a couple more centuries to come. Do as you think best for you, but without oil BILLIONS of people would starve to death within 6-8 months. Our world would devolve to that seen in the movie MAD MAX. And by-the way, the keyboards and most of the components of the computers you and I are typing on are derived from petochemical based compounds.

---

I wonder just what the costs would be of rounding up waste we deposit on our oceans? If we talk about cleaning up space junk from orbit, you'd think there would be a way to do this on our oceans as well. There has to be a way. Maybe we have to defy convention and perhaps even some laws to pull it off. But as our way of life becomes more and more unsustainable, we have to rethink everything clear down to basics like food, shelter, and sanitation.

Jolie Rouge
06-17-2010, 09:56 PM
The other, bigger 'oil spill': Your use of disposable plastic
By Daniella Russo Thu Jun 17, 2:05 pm ET

Carmel Valley, Calif. – As the world has watched the dreadful string of attempts to stanch the flow of oil from its source a mile down in the Gulf of Mexico, it's a good time to consider ways people can make a positive difference in the ocean.

That petroleum bubbling from the seabed is used to make plastic, and, at an alarming rate, that plastic returns to the ocean as pollution.

We've all been watching the BP cam of the broken oil well. But did you know that for quite some time, cameras have logged the swirling gyre in the ocean nicknamed the Pacific Garbage Patch? Did you know that the environmental devastation Atlantic Ocean is not new?

These ocean catastrophes did not begin with a fiery explosion. They began with a disposable cup, just like the cup you likely used at that weekend barbecue. By one estimate, the ocean has already been corrupted by 200 billion pounds of plastic pollution. Other experts estimate that we are now dumping additional billions of pounds of plastic each year.

The number continues to grow, driven by our ever-increasing consumption of things like plastic toothbrushes, toys, and combs, and single-use items like plastic bags, bottles, and straws.

Whatever happened to that mantra "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle"? Today the recycling part of that has taken off somewhat. But is it too little, too late? A placebo, a myth?

We are simply using too much disposable plastic for the small percentage that gets recycled to even make a dent. And, unlike paper, glass, or stainless steel, most plastic can only be "down-cycled," or used for increasingly fewer purposes. All the recycling, like using a teaspoon to empty the ocean, simply can't stem the tide of plastic engulfing us.

Billions of pounds of plastic? That's like a few million cars dumped into the sea every year. Maybe we let it happen because the pounds accumulate not by one-ton car increments but by fractions of an ounce – a straw here, a plastic bag there, an empty shampoo bottle over there. When we're doing it one plastic bottle cap at a time, it's hard to realize that we are turning the ocean into a trash can.

Will an ocean cleanup be effective?

Certainly any effort to clean up our polluted seas is to be applauded, but we should also make sure the work is worth the effort.

In the Gulf of Mexico, the arguably toxic oil-dispersant sprays and containment strategies seem woefully insufficient when barrels of oil churn each day from the source below. Is an ocean cleanup an equally futile effort when we're replacing the garbage that's there more quickly than we could ever scoop it up?

So much of the garbage creating these shameful plastic gyres is single-use disposable plastic.

The most powerful thing people can do to clean up the oceans is to refuse to use "disposable" plastics in the first place. Let's add "Refuse" to the list of R's: Refuse-Reduce-Reuse-Recycle. Until we reduce our use of plastics wherever possible, real change will not happen. Recycling or cleanup projects alone won't cut it.

So what does that mean?

Just say no to single-use plastic

It means that whenever you can, say no to using plastic that will end up in the garbage that same day. Daily life offers countless ways to start saying no – just start with one.

Once a day, refuse to use a plastic bag, a plastic bottle, straws, takeout containers, disposable cups, utensils, or unnecessary packaging. Start there. Phase out the single-use plastics in your life, reuse the ones you already have as much as you can, and then change your habits: Choose reusable products. Take all of your plastic containers to the nearest recycling center and don't replace them.

Then, begin choosing products sold in glass, metal, cardboard, and paper instead of plastic. These materials can be more effectively recycled or, when it's paper, biodegrade in water or landfills.

What about jobs in disposable plastic?

According to the American Chemistry Council (ACC), roughly 1 million people make a living off developing and manufacturing plastic. But reducing plastic pollution doesn't have to mean reducing jobs.

Members of the ACC who develop plastic should keep jobs by developing new, safe, biodegradable alternatives to plastic that do not leach toxins or contaminate the earth as they biodegrade. Plastic manufacturers should have a plan for end-of-life for each of their products and own up to their responsibilities.

Recycling or even reusing alone will not reduce the plastic waste on our planet if we continue to create more and more disposable plastic products every day. As the United States buckles down to months of Gulf oil spill cleanup, we must take advantage of that momentum to save the oceans.

Plastic pollution poses a massive threat to the health of our oceans. If we don't reduce dependence upon and production of single-use plastic alongside that cleanup and recycling, we are engaged in a somewhat Sisyphean task.

Life without plastic pollution is possible. Try it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20100617/cm_csm/307466/print;_ylt=AlMglf444PRQQEmj5h5y1tK7e8UF;_ylu=X3oDM TBycjdqNWs0BHBvcwMxNQRzZWMDYm90dG9tBHNsawNwcmludA--

comments

I love turning it into the four R's. I already point out to people that Recycle is just above throwing things out. It is better, but not by a huge amount. And refuse to take plastic is what I do on a regular basis with a lot of disposable items.
You can't avoid it all but you sure can try. I even go to potlucks with my own plate and fork....... You can also save a chunk of money while you are at it.
There are a ton of things that you buy that you don't need :)


Refuse
Reduce
Reuse
Recycle

----

Bed Bath and Beyond sells a brand of biodegradeable garbage bags in various sizes to fit coordinating metal step-lid trash cans--coupons always in magazines, online and you can get on mailing list to receive coupons. You gotta admit, there ARE some one-time use plastics that none of us would want to give up--medical/dental/technology--do you want a previously used bedpan, catheter, iv/trach tube? And why do cellphones and computers have to age in dog years? Why can't they just be updated/upgraded, kind of like going to a shoe cobbler? My cell service dealer couldn't replace the battery in my "old" phone...apparently 2 years old is "ancient". Tell that to a toddler who can't even dial their phonenumber yet!

---

....that shampoo, liquid soap, conditioner, toothpaste, lotion, and hundreds of other things you mentioned that come in a plastic bottle are themselves made of petrochemicals which have OIL as their base. Like it or not, ours is the age of PETROCHEMICAL MAN. This won't change for a couple more centuries to come. Do as you think best for you, but without oil BILLIONS of people would starve to death within 6-8 months. Our world would devolve to that seen in the movie MAD MAX. And by-the way, the keyboards and most of the components of the computers you and I are typing on are derived from petochemical based compounds.

---

I wonder just what the costs would be of rounding up waste we deposit on our oceans? If we talk about cleaning up space junk from orbit, you'd think there would be a way to do this on our oceans as well. There has to be a way. Maybe we have to defy convention and perhaps even some laws to pull it off. But as our way of life becomes more and more unsustainable, we have to rethink everything clear down to basics like food, shelter, and sanitation.