PDA

View Full Version : Survey finds R.I. ranks low on happiness index



ElleGee
12-26-2009, 09:41 PM
anything in italics is my commentary
01:00 AM EST on Sunday, December 27, 2009
By Linda Borg

Journal Staff Writer
PROVIDENCE — OK, it’s official: Rhode Islanders are among the most miserable people in the country. HA! me being an ahole is not my fault :) j/k
A recent report published in the elite journal Sci
ence confirmed what many of us in the Ocean State have known for years: Rhode Islanders are crabby. They like to complain — a lot. They take a perverse pleasure in being the smallest — and arguably one of the most corrupt states — in the union. I was/am a big Buddy Cianci supporter even though he went to jail for racketeering and tried to have his ex wife's lover effed up
Local musician and storyteller Bill Harley sums it up in his song, “The Size of the State of Rhode Island,” which he said should be our unofficial state song. With permission from Harley, it starts:

“Rhode Island’s the size of a spreading oil spill

Off of the coast of Bahia

Rhode Island’s the size of a giant landfill

Somewhere in the Crimea…”

Linda Lotridge Levin, who has lived here more than 30 years, said she has always found Rhode Island to be somewhat unpleasant and sometimes, downright hostile. Levin, who chairs the University of Rhode Island’s journalism department, also thinks that the closer you get to Providence, the crankier people become. I live exactly 1.02 miles from the center of our city

“Size is important,” she said. “We have an inferiority complex. We are always being compared to something. We think of our smallness as a negative.” this is total bs by the way. I have had family here for 104 years. Most of us think our smallness is a positive because it takes a shorter amount of time to do things in larger cities and everyone knows everyone here so getting things done if you know people takes even a faster amount of time like construction, inspections, permits and such. Inferior? No. Small townish in a small state? Yep

But two of our more affluent neighbors, Massachusetts and Connecticut, rate even lower on the happiness scale than we do, and New York ranks dead last, which prompted New York Times columnist Clyde Haberman to posit that contentment is overrated. we are miserable but not kicking puppy miserable

In the study, two economics professors compared data from a survey of more than 1.3 million Americans by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which asked participants how satisfied they were with their lives. Those findings were compared with “objective indicators” borrowed from research at the University of California Los Angeles. What they found is that Americans’ subjective feelings correlated closely with the so-called objective measurements, which looked at commuting time, crime, taxes, air quality, local spending on education, cost of living and other factors.

What the study can’t explain, however, is why Louisiana ranked number one (Katrina, anyone?) and several of the poorest states — Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama — made the Top Ten.

“We have been asked a lot whether we expected states like New York and California would do so badly in the happiness ranking,” said one of the professors, Andrew Oswald of the University of Warwick, in England. “The problem is, if too many individual people think these states would be marvelous places to live in, they move … and the resulting congestion and house prices make it a non-fulfilling prophecy.”

Rhode Islanders have ample reason to be depressed. We have the second-highest unemployment rate, 12.7 percent, in the nation, second only to Michigan’s. The state shed 1,300 jobs last month and it has the lowest employment rate in 11 years.

“In terms of some of the social issues, we are clearly near the bottom,” said Henry Shelton, a community activist who runs the George Wiley Center in Pawtucket. “That’s reflected in peoples’ attitudes. The people in power are unwilling to be creative. That makes people discouraged.”

Because of its size, Rhode Islanders tend to be very tribal, to stick with their own, according to Bill Shuey, director of the International Institute of Rhode Island, a refugee resettlement agency. this is very true.. We do have a 'pack' mentality even though we know our fellow pack member is wrong in 70 different ways. But what ever, we don't care

“But I’m a happy guy,” Shuey said. “I’m amazed at the resilience of the human spirit, the way people can bounce back from things that would kill me. That’s one of the benefits of my work. People appreciate being here. They don’t complain.”

Author and activist Richard J. Walton thinks that Rhode Islanders take a certain pride in their misery. nod

“We like being special,” he said. “We’re kind of proud of the fact that there is so much corruption in our state. Thirty-six school districts in a state our size. We get a perverse amusement out of that. But I think it’s a wonderful place to live. I like its smallness. I like that the highest point in our state — Jerimoth Hill — is only 812 feet high.”

Rhode Island is like the little brother who pulls your hair and breaks your toys, then turns around and gives you the biggest hug in the world. There is so much to love: the treasure-trove of historic buildings, the wealth of good restaurants, a thriving arts community and the beaches, the beaches, the beaches.

Not everyone buys the professors’ findings, however:

“Sometimes, academics do studies that are flawed and irrelevant,” said Maureen Moakley, a political science professor at the University of Rhode Island. “This may be one of them.”

[email protected]
http://www.projo.com/news/content/RI_happiness_reaction_12-27-09_1JGTG7C_v19.30f3508.html
-------------------------------------------------------

Despite all of this I do love living here.. :)

Jolie Rouge
12-26-2009, 10:10 PM
You could always move down here ... two words : MARDI GRAS !


Louisiana nice, New York not so: Happiest states revealed in new survey

According to the famous song about New York, if you can make it there, you can make it anywhere. New Yorkers would likely be happier if they did make it somewhere else – even next-door neighbor New Jersey, according to new research conducted to measure relative levels of happiness in the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. The Empire State trailed all others in the researchers’ list of the happiest U.S. states. Leading the pack was Louisiana, in spite of the damage caused by Hurricane Katrina.

The study compared aggregate state data on climate, cost of living, access to open water, park visits relative to population, environmental quality, commuting time, and other items often used to measure overall quality of life, then compared it to a state average of individual responses to a question about happiness in the Centers for Disease Control’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

Economists Andrew J. Oswald of the University of Warwick in England and Stephen Wu of Hamilton College in New York state found that state quality of life data strongly correlated with self-reported happiness among residents of individual states and constructed an index of state-level happiness based on their findings. The ten happiest states, according to the survey, are:


1. Louisiana
2. Hawaii
3. Florida
4. Tennessee
5. Arizona
6. Mississippi
7. Montana
8. South Carolina
9. Alabama
10. Maine

Certain characteristics of happier and unhappier states stand out in the survey:

Climate counts. Most of the happiest states are in the country’s warmer southern reaches, including almost half of the states in the fabled “Sun Belt”; Maine and Montana were the only two Frost Belt states to make the top ten. By contrast, the only warm-weather state to fall into the bottom ten was California – the nation’s most populous state, which brings up the second characteristic:

Lots of people add up to lots of misery, it appears. Five of the ten most miserable states are also among the nation’s ten most populous: California, New York, Illinois, Ohio, and Michigan. Pennsylvania, another top-ten state in population, lies just outside the ten most miserable, and bottom-ten-finisher New Jersey lies just outside the top ten in population. But climate apparently trumps population: California aside, none of the warm-climed states in the top ten appear in the list's bottom half.

Money doesn’t buy happiness. In contrast to an earlier study which found that the more affluent U.S. states were among the happier too, Oswald and Wu discovered a negative correlation between median household income and level of happiness among the states.

When asked why some of the country’s least happy places were also among the places people flock to, Oswald told The New York Times that many of these areas are indeed perceived as great places to live. “The problem,” he said, “is that if too many individuals think that way, they move into those states, and the resulting congestion and house prices make it a nonfulfilling prophecy.”

As for Louisiana leading the list, Oswald cautioned that its ranking may not be accurate now because it was based in part on data gathered before Hurricane Katrina devastated the state four years ago. But the state’s location, climate and cost of living would probably still put it in the top ranks.

The full study appeared in the online journal ScienceXpress on Dec. 17.

http://www.huliq.com/8738/89911/louisiana-nice-new-york-not-so-happiest-states-revealed-new-survey

Jolie Rouge
12-26-2009, 10:16 PM
Should government measure happiness?
by R. Veenhoven
Source: Global Times
22:22 December 24 2009
http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/commentary/2009-12/494228.html

Editor's Note: With the growing popularity of the people-oriented concept of governing, ranking the performance of local governments purely by GDP growth has drawn increasing criticism. As part of "scientific development," the city of Jiangyin in Jiangsu Province launched a "happiness index-based government performance evaluation system" in 2007 to channel the local government's attention away from the excessive pursuit of GDP. Opinion is divided on the effectiveness of this pilot program, which has been pointed to as a model for elsewhere. Heilongjiang Province's Party Life (PL) magazine recently invited Zhou Weijun (Zhou), a scholar of sociology, and Wang Qidong (Wang), a Party cadre, to debate the effectiveness of this index in evaluating government performance.

PL: Is the happiness index in line with current government concepts of development?

Zhou: I think the link between the two is reasonable. What exactly is the happiness index? It is a measure of people's feelings and experience toward their own lives and development. The employment of the index is a tangible sign of the emergence of a people-orientated concept of development. It moves beyond the development model marked by "growth without development, and wealth without happiness."

Wang: I am afraid that you are confusing the happiness index and the general government move toward emphasizing people's living conditions. Moreover, you ignore the subjectivity of happiness, which differs greatly from one person to another.

As one character in the TV series Ma Dashuai summarizes, "When I am hungry and I see someone with a meat bun in his hand, he or she is happier than me; when I feel cold and I see someone in a thick cotton-padded jacket, he or she is happier than me; and when I want to use a toilet where there is only one stool, and you are already there, then you are happier than me."

Some netizens say that "Happiness is the feeling a cat gets when it is eating a fish, or a dog when enjoying meat, or Ultraman when he is fighting Godzilla." For them, it is not scientific to employ the individual sense of happiness as a measurement of government performance.

PL: Can the happiness index be used to scientifically measure government performance?

Zhou: The happiness index is just a macro indicator, which can't correspond with everyone. It is not drawn from the question "Are you happy," but rather from the assessment of a system of targets which reflect government achievements and people's subjective quality of life.

Jiangyin has set a total of more than 50 indicators to ensure this is a scientific and fair measure. The indicators include family income, living environment, mental health and so on. Sixty percent of them are objective measures and the others are somewhat subjective.

Wang: Interference by subjective emotions can never be ruled out, no matter whether the concept of happiness index is applied to a community or to individuals. For instance, an office worker over 40 years old with a decent job, a successful husband and a child in university will be regarded by many around her as a happy middle-class citizen, but she herself may not think so.

PL: How is it possible to ensure the scientific nature of using a strongly emotion-laden happiness index as a serious indicator for assessment of government achievements?

Zhou: Whether the happiness index can reflect government performance scientifically depends on to what extent government achievements can affect people's sense of happiness. The Talent Evaluation and Social Survey Research Center of the Party School of the CPC Shandong Provincial Committee has measured happiness levels in six major cities in China every six months since 2002.

The results have shown that the present national happiness index is directly related to government achievements in aspect of people's livelihood. For example, the index has risen as the government has further improved the social security system to release the public from worrying about healthcare, education and housing.

Wang: I wonder if you have considered that if the happiness index becomes the local government's chief source data for its performance, it is likely to be overdrawn or distorted just like GDP. Some officials have been shown to engage in spurious happiness image projects just to boost the numbers.

PL: Can we really quantify happiness?

Zhou: To be sure, the present measurement of happiness can be improved. However, with technological development and in-depth research, quantification of the indicators of happiness can be gradually made better.

Officials in the Jiangyin Statistics Bureau stated that they had organized staff annually to select about 1,200 citizens or households randomly to conduct visiting questionnaire survey. They analyzed various objective evaluation indicators in the year like employment, income, environmental protection, healthcare, culture and so on, and also did follow-up studies to check the results. In my opinion, quantification of happiness cannot be achieved overnight, but we can work toward it.

Wang: I believe that you oversimplify the happiness index. Different evaluation mechanisms and samples usually lead to marked differences in conclusions. Even if the same research method is employed, the sense of happiness in different regions, cultures and economic conditions has different manifestations.

Dr Chen Huixiong at the Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics once conducted a survey, whose results showed that while the average happiness index in Zhejiang Province was 6.68, on a scale of 1-10, civil servants were happier than anyone else, ranking first at 7.2.

But an investigation made by Hangzhou Seventh Hospital indicated that 17 percent of public servants in Zhejiang had psychological problems, their sense of unhappiness far above that of other groups. So which of these two diametrically opposite conclusions regarding public servants in Zhejiang is more credible?

PL: What's the long term future of the happiness index??

Zhou: As early as the 1970s, Bhutan put forward the concept of "gross national happiness."

The happiness model established by Bhutan consists of four columns, nine sectors and 72 indicators. The four columns represent economy, culture, environment and good management. Specific targets, including such detailed ones like "How much time do you spend with your families and at work every day," are measured by the nine sectors and 72 indicators.

Currently, although the per capita GDP of Bhutan is only slightly over $700, its people's "happiness index" tops the list around the globe. The US, the UK and Japan have already started to study and promote the use of "gross national happiness" in politics.

Wang: With an immature theoretical system and a lack of clear scientific measures, the hasty inclusion of "happiness index" into the examination of government performance will inevitably be divorced from reality. It will even affect the correctness of decision-making and the healthy development of society and economy.

Haste makes waste. So where does happiness exactly lie? It lies in people's hearts, which can never be summarized or described by external indicators. If the quantification of a happiness index can't truly reflect people's sense of happiness, it will be the greatest mockery of happiness.