PDA

View Full Version : Wal-Mart Will Pay Workers $640 Million



atprm
12-26-2008, 05:35 AM
Wal-Mart Will Pay Workers $640 Million

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world's largest retailer, said it will pay as much as $640 million to settle 63 lawsuits over wage-and-hour violations, ending years of disputes.

The discount retailer, which has more than 1.4 million employees, said the amount it pays will depend on how many claims are submitted by eligible workers and could range from $352 million to $640 million.

The agreement the company announced Tuesday ends the vast majority of such cases against Wal-Mart. Each settlement still must be approved by a trial court.

Wal-Mart faced 76 similar class action lawsuits in courts across the country as of March 31, the company said in its most recent 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Bentonville, Ark.-based company said many of the settled lawsuits were filed years ago and the allegations are not representative of the company Wal-Mart is today.

"Our policy is to pay associates for every hour worked and to provide rest and meal breaks," Tom Mars, Wal-Mart's executive vice president and general counsel, said in a statement.

The company declined to discuss the case further. Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not return calls for comment Tuesday.

Wal-Mart has been working steadily to rehabilitate its image amid continuing scrutiny of its labor and business practices.

Earlier this month, Wal-Mart said it would pay up to $54.25 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging it cut workers' break time and didn't prevent employees from working off the clock in Minnesota.

Last year, Wal-Mart said it would pay more than $33 million in back wages to thousands of employees after turning itself in to the Labor Department for paying too little in overtime over the previous five years. Also last year, a judge in Pennsylvania ruled that Wal-Mart workers in that state who previously won a $78.5 million class-action award for working off the clock will share an additional $62.3 million in damages.

Under the announced agreement, Wal-Mart will continue to use various electronic systems and other measures to ensure its compliance with wage-and-hour policies and law.

Wal-Mart labor critics welcomed the settlement but said it gives no indication the company is changing its ways. Wal-Mart Watch Executive Director David Nassar said many workers still suffer mistreatment.

He said such lawsuits could have been avoided if the company had followed the law to begin with or allowed workers to unionize for better representation of their rights.

"If these millions of workers had been allowed union representation, they never would have had to hire lawyers and wait years to get their paychecks," he said.

Nassar and others said Wal-Mart, which has GOP ties, is settling the cases before the new presidential administration takes over.

"Wal-Mart typically fights lawsuits to the end more than any major corporation in America," said Burt P. Flickinger III, managing director of Strategic Resource Group, a retail-consulting firm. "So for the company to settle them within 30 days of President-elect Obama's inauguration indicates the company is trying to do what it can to present a newer face to the new administration and hope for the best given what the company did to try and keep the new administration being elected."

Flickinger said the company is changing, but still faces many of the labor hurdles that have riled its critics for years.

However, Flickinger said "ultimately everyone will be better off because of the settlement."

Richard D. Hastings, a strategist with Global Hunter Securities, said the settlement was good news for shareholders and Wal-Mart because it exacts only a one-time cost.

Wal-Mart, one of the few retailers doing well in a dismal holiday season, said it would take an after-tax charge to continuing operations of about $250 million, or approximately 6 cents per share, in its fiscal fourth quarter.

"This is a conclusion to the many years of issues, and everyone should be glad that it is behind them," Hastings said.

Shares in Wal-Mart, which rose 70 cents to close at $55.29 Tuesday before the settlement was announced, rose 21 cents further in after-hours trading.

---

AP Business Writer Anne D'Innocenzio contributed to this story from New York.

ma4angels
12-26-2008, 01:37 PM
If Wal-Mart decided to change and be a good company, then why don't they go a bit futher and give back that insurance money I feel they stole from that poor brain injuried woman. I realize that this has nothing to do with this story, but this woman was an employee of the company and she was in a terrible wreck. A big truck hit her and she bascially couldn't take care of herself anymore because she received a brain injury which cause damage. Her husband had to work to jobs to take care of cost for her care and for their sons college. He had her in an adult care home because she needed 24 hour nursing care. He then made the mistake of telling Wal mart that they had won an insurance settlement, so what does Wal-Mart do they sue him and take that settlement away from him so they were right back to where they started. I realize that according to some that Wal-Mart had the legal right to take that money but in my opinion they stole it from a sick women. I worked for this company for two years I know personally how they are not there for their employees like they say they are. They are about the All Mighty dollar. They are the worse place that anyone could work for.

stresseater
12-26-2008, 04:02 PM
If Wal-Mart decided to change and be a good company, then why don't they go a bit futher and give back that insurance money I feel they stole from that poor brain injuried woman. I realize that this has nothing to do with this story, but this woman was an employee of the company and she was in a terrible wreck. A big truck hit her and she bascially couldn't take care of herself anymore because she received a brain injury which cause damage. Her husband had to work to jobs to take care of cost for her care and for their sons college. He had her in an adult care home because she needed 24 hour nursing care. He then made the mistake of telling Wal mart that they had won an insurance settlement, so what does Wal-Mart do they sue him and take that settlement away from him so they were right back to where they started. I realize that according to some that Wal-Mart had the legal right to take that money but in my opinion they stole it from a sick women. I worked for this company for two years I know personally how they are not there for their employees like they say they are. They are about the All Mighty dollar. They are the worse place that anyone could work for.
If I wasn't so lazy today I'd search out the thread about this. Basically it boiled down to your point of view and another. That being that walmart's insurance paid out the money for her treatment and if anyone had the right to recoop that money thru a lawsuit it was them not the family of the injured.

Jenefer3
12-26-2008, 10:52 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,344818,00.html that's an update on the Walmart recouping the money from that lady.....it basically said that Walmart is no longer going after that money

ma4angels
12-27-2008, 12:42 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,344818,00.html that's an update on the Walmart recouping the money from that lady.....it basically said that Walmart is no longer going after that money

Thank you for put this on here I am really glad that they changed their minds about this case. This poor women didn't deserve this. I realize that there are some people who would go after any company for money just because they could not because they needed it for care. I could understand Walmart wanting the back then. But like they said upon looking at the case again they change because of the circumstances. It make me feel a little better.
I worked for them I am sorry as you can probably tell it wasn't the best experience I ever have