PDA

View Full Version : IRS bungles stimulus rebate payments



galeane29
05-15-2008, 07:26 PM
If you have your hopes set on a big "economic stimulus" payment arriving in your bank account any day now, you might have to wait a bit longer. The IRS has announced that a subset of taxpayers is affected by a glitch that is delaying rebates sent to them.

The issue affects people who used a service or software program to do their 2007 taxes and opted to have the fee for those services deducted from the stimulus payment and sent via direct deposit. A bug (which the IRS has not elaborated upon) means those payments will now have to be made via a check sent via postal mail.

In addition to this bug, the IRS has confessed that 1,500 checks or direct payments were sent to the wrong taxpayers. While some reports blame this problem on a computer glitch, the IRS says that it can't necessarily pin the issue on a computer problem. Check any payments received carefully to make sure they're actually yours.


If you have received a check or inaccurate (or duplicate) direct deposit, you are required by law to mail the check back to the IRS and/or report the issue to your bank. If you spent the money, you'll have to pay it back as well.

Finally, the IRS said today that 350,000 households aren't getting properly credited for children in the payments. Makeup checks will be sent out in July.

This isn't the first time the IRS has screwed up rebate payments. In 2001 it sent half a million taxpayers notices of impending rebates (in a similar stimulus/tax relief scheme to what we have this year) that they would never be receiving.

Still haven't gotten your payment? Best not to try calling the IRS, which is now dealing with a reported 2 million incoming phone calls a day. Instead, check the IRS.gov website and consult the payment schedule on this page. And be patient.

UPDATE: The IRS writes to say 1,500 taxpayers are affected, not 15,000



http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/93333

PrincessArky
05-16-2008, 04:05 AM
wow I wonder how many ppl that already got paid that werent supposed to already spent the money lol

magenta
05-16-2008, 06:12 AM
wow I wonder how many ppl that already got paid that werent supposed to already spent the money lol

I was thinking the same thing.


And all those stamps! The letter saying they were coming, the one saying they were deposited and now the ones saying we screwed up. I wish I was really good at math, because all that money could have went to something much more needed!

Jenefer3
05-16-2008, 06:58 AM
I was thinking the same thing.


And all those stamps! The letter saying they were coming, the one saying they were deposited and now the ones saying we screwed up. I wish I was really good at math, because all that money could have went to something much more needed!

3 letters at 42 cents for each stamp = $1.26 x 350,000 = $441,000 --just on stamps (the amount may be off if they used 41 cent stamps at any point)

SLance68
05-16-2008, 08:56 AM
3 letters at 42 cents for each stamp = $1.26 x 350,000 = $441,000 --just on stamps (the amount may be off if they used 41 cent stamps at any point)

Bulk rate is much lower. I am sure they didn't spend more than 10 cents per letter. But at 30 cents for the 3 x the number of taxpayers would be a huge amount of "government waste". Oh wait they are the government that is what they are suppose to do.

The really bad part is - if you cashed the check instead of mailing the original check back they will charge you penalties and interest. I have had this problem at work where the IRS kept sending us a check that we were not suppose to get - our CPA told me to put it in a envelope and send it back. They sent me that same damn check 8 times before one of the idiots finally figured out that they were wrong. Then they tried to charge us penalties & interest. We got no penalties or interest charges because we sent back the Original Check.

Jenefer3
05-16-2008, 08:59 AM
Bulk rate is much lower. I am sure they didn't spend more than 10 cents per letter. But at 30 cents for the 3 x the number of taxpayers would be a huge amount of "government waste". Oh wait they are the government that is what they are suppose to do.

The really bad part is - if you cashed the check instead of mailing the original check back they will charge you penalties and interest. I have had this problem at work where the IRS kept sending us a check that we were not suppose to get - our CPA told me to put it in a envelope and send it back. They sent me that same damn check 8 times before one of the idiots finally figured out that they were wrong. Then they tried to charge us penalties & interest. We got no penalties or interest charges because we sent back the Original Check.

Yeah I figured bulk mailing was cheaper but I didn't know the rate...still a whole lot of waste either way.

SLance68
05-16-2008, 09:03 AM
Yeah I figured bulk mailing was cheaper but I didn't know the rate...still a whole lot of waste either way.

AMEN.

magickay
05-16-2008, 09:35 AM
Yeah I figured bulk mailing was cheaper but I didn't know the rate...still a whole lot of waste either way.

Not to mention the paper cost (envelopes and stationary). How much of that went into recycling? :)

PrincessArky
05-16-2008, 10:50 AM
Not to mention the paper cost (envelopes and stationary). How much of that went into recycling? :)

yeah really