"The War on Women"

Quote:

---

Ben Domenech@bdomenech

RT @seanmdav: This happened. RT @Chris_Moody Obama campaign says "lady parts" hang in the balance of the election bit.ly/WeJb1w

2 Oct 12

---

https://o.twimg.com/1/proxy.jpg?t=FQ...Td2WtEC1ifjoCg

For shame: Women, Obama literally reduced you to sum of your "LadyParts";
‘Vote like lady parts depend on it’;

Posted at 1:39 pm on October 2, 2012

Yep, that happened. President Obama has now literally reduced women to the sum of their “lady parts” only. His campaign is telling women to “vote like your lady parts depend on it.” Wow, how empowering. You’ve come a long way, baby!

From his official campaign Tumblr: http://barackobama.tumblr.com/post/3...inda-do-really

http://thisistwitchy.files.wordpress...ng?w=430&h=246

How dare he? Shame on him. First he tries to reduce women to “Julias,” http://twitchy.com/2012/05/03/meet-j...n-obamas-life/ enslaved by and tethered to Big Daddy Government from cradle to grave. http://twitchy.com/2012/05/03/the-li...and-curiouser/ The poor dears can’t manage a thing on their own, except for maybe making Obama a sammich.

Now, he quite literally tells women to vote with, and for, their “lady parts,” grossly diminishing women. Beyond reprehensible, Obama campaign. War on women? As always, it’s from the Left. They believe women are stupid and incapable of thinking for themselves. In fact, they are incapable of even using their itty bitty brains http://twitchy.com/2012/08/12/msnbcs...or-moms-women/ they must think with their girly bits only. You know, like dancing vaginas. http://twitchy.com/2012/08/28/empowe...op-convention/

Quote:

---

David Burge@iowahawkblog

Nothing says "pro-woman" like treating female voters as hysterical brain-damaged walking uteri barackobama.tumblr.com/post/326830151…

2 Oct 12

---

Quote:

---

Kathryn@katearthsis

Isn't saying "lady parts" kind of misogynistic? Just like dressing up like a giant vagina is objectifying & crude? Why don't they get this?

2 Oct 12

---

Quote:

---

sevenlayercake@sevenlayercake

Dear @BarackObama's Tumblr: I vote with my brain and not with my "lady parts." Seriously WTF?

2 Oct 12

---

Quote:

---

. C.@dsctxn

@NolteNC I am a woman & I'm insulted by this. My 'Lady Parts' are not as important an issue as jobs & foreign policy. Note to Obama: I vote.

2 Oct 12 Reply

---

Quote:

---

David Burge@iowahawkblog

Official campaign Tumblr page: vote for Obama, or your vajay-jay will die barackobama.tumblr.com/post/326830151…

2 Oct 12

---

Quote:

---

Emily Miller@EmilyMiller

RT @amandacarpenter: President Obama, quit worrying about my lady parts and start worrying about my wallet, OK? bit.ly/U7m4II

2 Oct 12

---

Quote:

---

CatsPolitics@CatsPolitics

I am a Conservative. I vote for the candidates who don't define me by my "lady parts". bit.ly/PLl1In

2 Oct 12

---

Quote:

---

John Hayward@Doc_0

Obama website: "Vote like your lady parts depend on it." Well, unless you're about to lose them in a sex-selection abortion.

2 Oct 12

---

Yep. That’s fine, of course. Even if they survive an abortion attempt and don’t “just come out limp and dead,” as President Obama repulsively said. http://twitchy.com/2012/05/31/house-...is-hunky-dory/

Quote:

---

Dan McLaughlin@baseballcrank

We've come a long way down from Washington, Lincoln, FDR & Reagan to 'vote your lady parts.'

2 Oct 12

---

Quote:

---

John Hayward@Doc_0

Vote Obama out of office, and prove that your sexiest lady part is your brain. Well, one of the sexiest. Top Five easy.

2 Oct 12

---

To him and to his fellow travelers, you are only a means to an end. And you must be scared away from daring to stray from the Democrat plantation.

Guess what, President Obama? Women will vote with their “lady parts.” Their brains.

Shame on you, President Obama.

Shame on you.

Update: Campaign yanks e-card from site, claims ‘not properly reviewed’

The campaign has yanked the reprehensible “vote like your lady parts depend on it” e-card from its site.

Quote:

---

David Burge@iowahawkblog

Awww. Obama campaign site post telling women to vote with their "lady parts" vanishes down the memory hole barackobama.tumblr.com/post/326830151…

2 Oct 12

---

But Twitchy is forever.

Quote:

---

Jim Treacher@jtLOL

"We have a review process for our online content and this piece did not go through our regular review." Weird. Why not? dailycaller.com/2012/10/02/oba…

2 Oct 12

---

More from The Daily Caller: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/02/ob...-been-removed/

Quote:

---

An Obama campaign official explained to The Daily Caller that the post was taken down because it had not been properly reviewed. "We have a review process for our online content and this piece did not go through our regular review,” the campaign official wrote in an email. “When it was discovered, it was taken down.”

---

When it was discovered. By that, they mean when they were caught. Huh. Sounds familiar! You have to post the misogyny, to find out what’s in the misogyny!


Related: Citizens demand #PresidentLadyParts answer for his misogynist ‘lady parts’ campaign move http://twitchy.com/2012/10/02/citize...campaign-move/

Quote:

---

Campaign yanks e-card from site, claims ‘not properly reviewed’

---

Kinda like those unattended daily briefings........

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge

https://o.twimg.com/1/proxy.jpg?t=FQ...Td2WtEC1ifjoCg

For shame: Women, Obama literally reduced you to sum of your "LadyParts";
‘Vote like lady parts depend on it’;

Posted at 1:39 pm on October 2, 2012

Yep, that happened. President Obama has now literally reduced women to the sum of their “lady parts” only. His campaign is telling women to “vote like your lady parts depend on it.” Wow, how empowering. You’ve come a long way, baby!

From his official campaign Tumblr: http://barackobama.tumblr.com/post/3...inda-do-really

http://thisistwitchy.files.wordpress...ng?w=430&h=246

---

October 15, 2012

Unexpectedly! Women Don't Actually Vote With Their Ladyparts

Who knew? Oh yeah, the guy who supposedly doesn't understand women at all: http://www.memeorandum.com/121015/p69#a121015p69

Quote:

---

Mitt Romney leads President Obama by four percentage points among likely voters in the nation's top battlegrounds, a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll finds, and he has growing enthusiasm among women to thank.

As the presidential campaign heads into its final weeks, the survey of voters in 12 crucial swing states finds female voters much more engaged in the election and increasingly concerned about the deficit and debt issues that favor Romney. The Republican nominee now ties the president among women who are likely voters, 48%-48%, while he leads by 12 points among men.

---

Too funny. We don't know who's going to be more upset about this - the Obama Campaign or the jackwagons on both sides who think the only thing uniting uterus-having folk is a perverse desire to replace our husbands and our children's fathers with a cradle-to-grave Nanny State.

*Whatever*




Posted by Cassandra at October 15, 2012 06:35 PM

http://www.villainouscompany.com/vcb...ctedly_wo.html

Fact Checking Obama's "War on Women" & The Debate - Sean Hannity - 10-17-12

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zj_YK...ature=youtu.be

Fashion Backward: Obama’s Hate Couture Divas
By Michelle Malkin • October 24, 2012 09:45 AM

http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-co...ZZ688984F6.jpg

Talk about wearing your politics on your sleeve. An elitist clique of fashion designers has banded together to raise money for celebrity-in-chief Barack Obama and browbeat their customers into supporting him. Even worse, the Beautiful People who dress the Powerful People are putting increased pressure on conservatives to stay out of the business altogether.

Out: Haute couture. In: Hate couture.

In February, high-dollar bag-makers, cosmetics gurus and clothiers offered their services to help fill Obama’s campaign coffers. Nearly two dozen gurus billed their enterprise as “Runway to Win: A Project by Fashion Designers in Support of the Obama Victory Fund.” Campaign finance experts questioned whether employees of the corporate participants were truly “volunteering” their time in accordance with federal law. But of course, no Obama administration lawyers have bothered to enforce the rules.

A “custom backpack” with the “Obama rising sun logo” designed by model Chanel Iman goes for $65. A teeny-tiny baby onesie with “OBAMA” in bright red and blue letters goes for $65. A hideous Monique Pean cotton and hemp scarf with Obama’s face splattered on it went for $95. Diane von Furstenberg pitched in two $85 tote bags and has grown more strident about her partisan agenda as Election Day nears. At a fashion event in her New York Meatpacking District store last month, she yelled at clients: “Everyone here better be a Democrat; no Republicans!”

Furthermore, von Furstenberg vented, “This is not a Republican party, just so you know! This is a non-Republican audience.” The crowd cheered as she urged everyone to rush home to watch her Democratic idol’s convention speech. But when conservative consumers protested on Twitter the next few nights, von Furstenberg tweeted: “I love and respect all Americans…Democrats and Republicans…love Diane.”

“All Americans,” except for Ann Romney, that is. When the designer learned last week that the GOP candidate’s wife had worn one of her famous wrap dresses at a recent campaign rally in Florida, the company had a hissy fit. “(W)e’re actually not quite sure how Ann obtained the dress,” horrified public relations staffers told left-wing Buzzfeed.com.

Accustomed to comping pieces to first lady Michelle Obama and other favored lib celebs, von Furstenberg’s team couldn’t wrap their heads around the idea that most women who are fortunate enough to afford their products spend their own money to purchase them. She bought it? Mon dieu!

DVF Inc. then frantically distanced themselves from Mrs. Romney — and idiotically alienated half of American women.

While the president and first lady have ratcheted up their class warfare rhetoric against the Romneys, the Obama campaign has basked in the 1 percent glow of fashionistas woefully out of touch with middle America. British-born Vogue magazine editor-in-chief Anna Wintour, a top Obama campaign finance bundler, is aggressively spearheading Runway to Win. She’s held multiple million-dollar fundraisers for Obama in Hollywood, New York, London and Paris — and has raked in the fourth highest amount for the White House.

In return, she snagged two coveted invitations to fancy-schmancy White House State Dinners in January 2011 and March 2012. Wintour’s $40,000-per-plate dinners are adorned with A-list celebs. She rubbed her nose in hurting families’ faces by starring in a swanky campaign video filmed at her tony townhouse — which was released the same day the Labor Department released a miserable May unemployment report. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAlnK...layer_embedded



New Yorkers are now buzzing about Wintour intimidating designers into spurning Republican women. “The fashion industry is predominantly on the left,” fashion publicist Lee Everett of LaunchPad PR told FoxNews.com, “noting that many brands and designers fear being associated with the GOP.”

A political code of silence among conservatives in the business is de rigueur. But Everett sensibly lamented the industry’s writing off of “the other ’50 percent’ of the country. For the sake of the fashion industry, it should remain apolitical.”

Young New York City designer Bradley Scott also spoke up against ideological “persecution” in his industry. “It’s really offensive for me, as a designer, to be issued an unveiled threat by someone who could exert an enormous amount of influence over my customers, store buyers and magazine editors,” he told me on Tuesday. “I for one want absolutely nothing to do with this attack on women. This pressure upon designers should offend every woman in this country, not just the conservatives.”

After four years of failed Hope and Change, Americans are finally realizing that the emperor of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. has no clothes. After Election Day, the demagoguing Democratic doyennes of Seventh Ave. may well find themselves out of style, too. Bigotry never wears well.

http://michellemalkin.com/2012/10/24...couture-divas/

comments

But when conservative consumers protested on Twitter the next few nights, von Furstenberg tweeted: “IloveandrespectallAmericans…DemocratsandRepublica nsI WANT YOUR MONEY……love Diane.”

...

These elite useful idiots provide their own rope (or in this case scarfs) to hang themselves with. These people are cutting of their nose to spite their face. Always entertaining watching libtards throw tantrums at their own expense.

..

Thanks Michelle. Good article. I believe that in their heart of hearts every person that describes themselves as a “liberal” is a fascist, in every deplorable sense of that word. They believe in the Bill of Rights, especially free speech, for liberals only. They have shown this time and time again. I remember Hollyweird pedophile (and liberal hero) Woody Allen stating that he wished Maobama could be a dictator for a few years so there would be no obstacles to instituting the liberal agenda.

If liberals could, they would pass a law outlawing conservative speech, and would imprison conservative leaders, for the “common good”. I do not doubt that for one second.

..

“The Devil Wears Bigotry”?

..

I doubt that most normal average women who work every day just to make ends meet, would be interested in these clowns. They are of another culture, not the culture of true America. Let them have their fantasy existence. I would bet if any of them lost their money, they would have to jump off a bridge or something. They would not survive. How could they live without caviar? Arugula? Wagu beef? Life would be meaningless. As for me, I continue to stock up on canned ham and spam. And I am one happy camper besides.

Mr. Scrapper and I went to a fancy dinner one night with the Mayor of Minneapolis, and lots of senators, lawyers, etc. The featured speaker was William F. Buckley, Jr. Yes, it was quite a long time ago. We had gotten tickets to the $300.00 a plate dinner from someone at work who couldn’t go.

We sat at a round table with some nice filthy rich people and I felt totally alienated. The talk by Mr. Buckley was fabulous. The dinner consisted of a tiny piece of chicken, a couple asparagus spears, and whatever. Not enough to keep a bird alive.

On the way home, I took my shoes off and told Mr. Scrapper to stop at McDonalds so we could EAT. Back in our own element, we were giddy with relief.

Just as those people cannot relate to common folks, neither can we relate to them!! And who would want to?

This is the culture that Obama lives in, yet he continually vilifies the rich. He is the most hypocritical person on the planet. And his rich pals can’t even see it. They are all blind and stupid and I actually pity them.

Quote:

---

A “custom backpack” with the “Obama rising sun logo” designed by model Chanel Iman goes for $65. A teeny-tiny baby onesie with “OBAMA” in bright red and blue letters goes for $65. A hideous Monique Pean cotton and hemp scarf with Obama’s face splattered on it went for $95. Diane von Furstenberg pitched in two $85 tote bags and has grown more strident about her partisan agenda as Election Day nears.

---

Just the attire that goes well with the Obama-phone. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio

The President’s ‘Silly Sexist Defense’ of Susan Rice Fails To Impress
November, 16, 2012 — nicedeb

http://nicedeb.files.wordpress.com/2...4647.jpg?w=780

Look who’s sounding more and more like a female version of Pat Caddell, every day:

Kirsten Powers: President Obama’s silly, sexist defense of Susan Rice:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...#ixzz2CPP5cVTs

Quote:

---

It’s absurd and chauvinistic for Obama to talk about the woman he thinks should be Secretary of State of the United States as if she needs the big strong man to come to her defense because a couple of Senators are criticizing her.

Believe it or not, Rice isn’t the first potential Cabinet nominee to be opposed by members of Congress up on the Hill. Obama also left out the inconvenient detail that there is another senator who has Rice in the crosshairs: Sen. Kelly Ayotte. But perhaps a female Senator holding Rice accountable didn’t sound menacing enough in the era of the “War on Women.”

But it gets much worse.

As the president expressed outrage over the atrocity of members of Congress holding administration officials accountable, he said, “I’m happy to have that discussion with them. But for them to go after the U.N. ambassador? Who had nothing to do with Benghazi?”

Feast on those words for a second: The U.N. Ambassador had “nothing to do with Benghazi.” At this point, the White House press corps should have flown into a frenzy, demanding to know why a person who had nothing to do with Benghazi was put on five Sunday talk shows as…the face of Benghazi!

This was an issue that had people scratching their heads the day of the Rice interviews, and plenty of questions were asked as to where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was, and why Rice was put out instead. The administration at the time acted as though there was nothing remarkable about it, even though there clearly was.

But now we know — straight from the lips of the president of the United States — that they sent out a person who knew “nothing” about Benghazi to explain an atrocious attack against the United States that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans serving their country abroad.

---

The silly, sexist, and I would add racialist defense Susan Rice is meant to shut down inquiry, it’s important to note. That is why Kelly Ayotte is never mentioned in any of the Obamacrats’ counterattacks. It’s weak, but these tactics have worked in the past. I don’t think it’s going to work, this time, though. Republicans have shown no signs of backing down.

Weasel Zippers: Congressional Black Caucus Chair: GOP Criticizing Susan Rice Is Racist And Sexist… http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/16/c...st-and-sexist/

So friggen predictable. :wahwah:

Quote:

---

WASHINGTON (AP) — A dozen female members of the House staunchly defended U.N. ambassador Susan Rice against Republican criticism over her remarks on the deadly Sept. 11 Libya attack, suggesting the GOP lawmakers’ comments were racist and sexist.

“It is a shame that anytime something goes wrong, they pick on women and minorities,” Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, the next chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, told reporters Friday at a Capitol Hill news conference.

Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham earlier this week called Rice untrustworthy and unqualified to be the nation’s top diplomat if President Barack Obama chooses her to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. The two vowed to block any Senate confirmation if she is nominated.

---

See what they’re doing? They want everyone to forget about the Regime’s heinous assault on the truth and get offended over phoney strawman issues: racism, sexism!!!

They’re trying to Fluke-ify Susan Rice.

Not to mention the lefts attacks on Condi Rice all those years ....


Powerline: Eric Holder comes up short: http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive...s-up-short.php

Quote:

---

If Holder really did not inform Obama of the DOJ investigation into the Petraeus-Broadwell-Kelley matter, then he clearly failed to do his duty.

How many more significant failures will Holder be allowed before Obama replaces him with (one hopes) a competent, honest Attorney General?

JOHN adds: I’m pretty sure Obama doesn’t want a competent, honest Attorney General.

---

Yeahp.



Edward Klein: Yes, Obama is still an amateur president: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...#ixzz2CPeHdg1j

Quote:

---

Coming off an ugly, divisive campaign, America is likely to get not just four more years of Obama, but four worse years. Obama won the election with fewer votes than in 2008. By any measure, it was a status quo election, and yet Obama is now facing a slew of problems that would test the mettle of a far more able chief executive—everything from the debacle in Benghazi and the Petraeus sex scandal to the fiscal cliff and the possibility of a double-dip recession.

What’s more, Obama is entering these dangerous times at the very moment when the team that put him in charge is breaking up. In the coming weeks, key members of his inner circle, including chief strategist David Axelrod, senior adviser David Plouffe and campaign manager Jim Messina, are all departing for the private sector. The only member of his consiglieri who will be back for a second term is Valerie Jarrett, a hard left-winger who is hardly known for her political perspicacity and the quality of her advice.

Because of Obama’s detached and impersonal leadership style, no one in Congress fears him, and the Republicans who control the House are unlikely to roll over and do his bidding. However, if Obama digs in his heels, refuses to compromise and work with the Republicans, goes over the head of Congress and takes his case to the public through a kind of permanent campaign, and then, after all that, fails to get his agenda through Congress, this country is headed for a very dismal next four years.

---

http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2012/11...ls-to-impress/

After reading about Nadia Murad Basee Taha, who recounted her horrors as "war booty" to the Islamic State where she was beaten and raped countless times, the following quote from the Koran comes to mind...

http://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/...b6&oe=57191525