Thread: Hillary in 2016 ?

H/T LOUDER WITH CROWDER: http://louderwithcrowder.com/

“This week, AmericaRising released an ad on Hillary Clinton. I usually don’t like, nor commentate on these kinds of ads.

But this ad, is without a doubt, the most effective anti-campaign ad that I’ve ever seen. And it shows Conservatives the blueprint on how to beat Hillary. Attack the dishonesty. I’ve been saying this for years. Hillary Clinton is more than a slimy politician, she’s a compulsive liar. She lies about big things, but more importantly, she lies about little things when she thinks that nobody’s watching. For no reason! Ignore the “sexism” claims from the left, speak freely, and focus on this. Watch below. It’s a must.”

VIDEO BY America Rising PAC

NYT Reporter: Clinton Officials Lied About a Meeting Taking Place, Unaware of Photo Evidence
Daniel Bassali
April 23, 2015 12:19 pm



In a Fox News preview of “The Tangled Clinton Web,” a New York Times reporter accused the Clinton Foundation of lying to her about a meeting Bill Clinton had with Kazatomprom officials regarding the sale of uranium to Russia. http://video.foxnews.com/v/419170976...#sp=show-clips http://video.foxnews.com/v/419170976...#sp=show-clips

“Frank Giustra arranged for officials to go to Bill Clinton’s house in Chappaqua,” reporter Jo Becker said.

“When I first contacted the Clinton Foundation, they denied any such meeting ever took place. And when we told them we have already talked to the head, who not only told us all about the meeting but actually has a picture of him and Bill at the home, that he proudly displays on his office wall, they then acknowledge the meeting had taken place.”

Becker’s scathing report based off of allegations in the book Clinton Cash found that the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars in return for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approving the transaction of American uranium into Russian hands. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...m-company.html

The New York Times, Fox News, and other media outlets have arranged an exclusive agreement to report on the stories referred to in Clinton Cash. The Clinton Foundation remains under a mountain of scandal accusations that will only get worse as more reports are sure to be filed in the coming weeks offering more examples of the Clintons’ blurred lines while in power.

http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...hoto-evidence/

State Department approved 215 Bill Clinton speeches, controversial consulting deal, worth $48m;
Hillary Clinton's COS copied on all decisions

Luke Rosiak and Micah Morrison • | July 30, 2014 | 1:00 am

A joint investigation by the Washington Examiner and the nonprofit watchdog group Judicial Watch found that former President Clinton gave 215 speeches and earned $48 million while his wife presided over U.S. foreign policy, raising questions about whether the Clintons fulfilled ethics agreements related to the Clinton Foundation during Hillary Clinton's tenure as secretary of state.

According to documents obtained by Judicial Watch and released Wednesday in an ongoing Freedom of Information Act case, State Department officials charged with reviewing Bill Clinton's proposed speeches did not object to a single one.

Some of the speeches were delivered in global hotspots and were paid for by entities with business or policy interests in the U.S.

The documents also show that in June 2011, the State Department approved a consulting agreement between Bill Clinton and a controversial Clinton Foundation adviser, Doug Band.

The consultancy with Band's Teneo Strategy ended eight months later following an uproar over Teneo's ties to the failed investment firm MF Global.

State Department legal advisers, serving as "designated agency ethics officials," approved Bill Clinton's speeches in China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Panama, Turkey, Taiwan, India, the Cayman Islands and other countries.

The memos approving Mr. Clinton's speeches were routinely copied to Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's senior counsel and chief of staff.

Mills is a longtime Clinton troubleshooter who defended the president during his impeachment. In the Benghazi affair, Mills reportedly berated a high-ranking official at the U.S. embassy in Libya for talking to a Republican congressman.

Under State Department protocols, a "designated agency ethics official" is assigned to advise the secretary of state about "potential or actual conflicts of interest."

In a December 2008 memorandum of understanding, the protocols were expanded to Bill Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and related initiatives — specifically, to reviewing Bill Clinton's proposed speeches and consulting deals.

In an accompanying letter to the State Department legal adviser, Clinton lawyer David Kendall noted that Bill Clinton would disclose proposed consulting deals and, for speeches, provide "the identities of the host(s) (the entity that pay the speaker's fee)" so that the State Department "in consultation with the White House as appropriate, may conduct a review for any real or apparent conflicts of interest with the duties of the Secretary of State."

But an inspection by the Examiner and Judicial Watch of donations to the Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton's personal financial disclosure forms, and the State Department conflict-of-interest reviews shows that at least $48 million flowed to the Clintons' personal coffers from many entities that clearly had interests in influencing the Obama administration — and perhaps currying favor with a future president as well.

Saudi Arabia, for example, was a key Clinton benefactor. The oil-producing giant has had a relationship with the Clintons dating back to Bill Clinton's time as governor of Arkansas.

In 1992, while running for president, then-Gov. Clinton secured a $3.5 million Saudi donation for a Middle East studies program at the University of Arkansas.

A few weeks after Clinton was inaugurated president, the Saudis kicked in another $20 million. Both deals were brokered by a close Clinton friend, David Edwards.

Overall, the Clinton Foundation has received staggering sums from Saudi benefactors — between $18 million and $50 million. (The foundation's donations are reported in ranges, not specific numbers.)

While Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, Bill Clinton gave two speeches in Saudi Arabia, earning a total of $600,000.

In January 2011, for example, Bill Clinton spoke at a global business forum in Riyadh founded by the Saudi Investment Authority and sponsored by the Dabbagh Group, a commercial colossus with close ties to the Saudi royal family.

His fee for the speech: $300,000.

During Hillary Clinton's time at the State Department, Bill Clinton also gave four speeches in the United Arab Emirates, earning $1.1 million. For two speeches in Egypt, he earned $425,000.

UAE-linked entities also have donated at least $2.7 to $11.5 million to the Clinton Foundation, and Egyptian entities have donated at least $250,000 to $750,000.

While the State Department did not object to Bill Clinton's speeches in the Arab world — or anywhere else — it did turn down a proposed consultancy with a longtime Clinton friend and supporter, the Israeli-American media mogul Haim Saban.

In turning down the consultancy, a February 2009 State Department memo noted that Saban "is actively involved in foreign affairs issues, particularly with regards to the Middle East, which is a priority area for the secretary."

The consultancy with Teneo and Band, the longtime Clinton adviser, was outlined in a June 2011 memo from Band himself, writing "on behalf of President Clinton," to a State Department legal adviser. Bill Clinton would advise Teneo on "geopolitical, economic and social trends."

Band requested a response within 10 business days. He got it in seven. "Please be advised that we have no objection," the State Department wrote.

Bill Clinton also was active in China, as was Hillary Clinton, who championed the notion of a "pivot" toward Asia during her time as secretary of state.

In the period after Hillary Clinton signed the ethics agreement, Bill Clinton gave four speeches in China or to Chinese-sponsored entities in the U.S., earning $1.7 million.

By comparison, between 2001 through 2007 — just after he left office, when a former president is normally most in demand — he gave seven speeches in China, earning $1.4 million.

Groups with interests in China also donated between $750,000 and $1.75 million, at a minimum, to the Clinton Foundation.

Taiwan took an interest in Bill Clinton as well. In November 2010, he spoke on global warming and social inequality at a Taipei event sponsored by Singapore-based UNI Strategic. His fee? $400,000.

The Taiwan Economic and Cultural Office donated close to $1 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the Taiwan Mobile Foundation and a semiconductor manufacturer also contributed.

Turkish sponsors paid Bill Clinton $1 million for three speeches, including one to an Arab stock exchange.

In Russia, Bill Clinton gave two speeches for $625,000. One was to the Russian investment bank, Renaissance Capital, at a 2010 event titled "Russian and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Going Global."

The State Department background memo described the bank as "focused on the emerging markets of Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Sub-Saharan Africa."

The Russian Standard Bank also donated to the foundation.

In India, Bill Clinton collected $300,000 for two speeches. He also gave speeches to Indian companies and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce in Toronto, New Jersey and Disney World.

At one, a "conference on business process outsourcing/off-shoring," hosted by an outsourcing firm, the discussion centered around "the benefits and disadvantages of outsourcing IT," according to a State Department document.

In Panama, Bill Clinton earned $325,000 for one speech. And in the Cayman Islands — a notorious offshore money haven — $225,000 for a speech, noted a State Department document, "at a ticketed event that will target the business community in Grand Cayman."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/st...GGp4s.facebook

Hillary Tells Christians They HAVE to Change Their Beliefs Over Abortion
April 24, 2015
by Warner Todd Huston

As she warms up her new campaign for president, Hillary Clinton has a message for Christians: You morons better change your feelings on abortion or you are denying women “health care.”

First of all, abortion is not healthcare. It is a mere convenience used to allow a mother-to-be to escape having to deal with the “disease” of pregnancy. At least, that is how the left looks at pregnancy; as a disease.

But Hillary is now out there saying that if you are a Christian who stands against abortion on religious grounds, why, then, you want women to get sick and die… or something.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton took a feminist tone on Thursday. She told attendees at the sixth annual Women in The World Summit that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed” for the sake of giving women access to “reproductive health care and safe childbirth.”

“Far too many women are denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth, and laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” Clinton said.

Here is exactly how she said it at about 8:26 into the video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=pVTiAJ1e9SM


There is little doubt that with their hatred of Christians Democrats are on the road toward an eventual outlawing of Christianity. With their beliefs that Christians are evil and want to kill women, it is the only logical end they can come to.

I mean, who needs that old “religious freedom” stuff our nation was founded upon, anyway? Hillary sure doesn’t.

http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/v...over-abortion/

Hillary Asks People to Put Free Bumper Stickers on Their Cats.
Here are the Sarcastic Responses.
By Katie LaPotin (28 mins ago)

Hillary Clinton, call your office… or better yet, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals!

The 2016 presidential candidate inadvertently set off a firestorm Friday when her campaign suggested that supporters place their free, limited-edition “I <3 Hillary” stickers on the backs of America’s favorite feline friends.

http://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video/CDYEBIoWoAEduAq.mp4
https://pbs.twimg.com/tweet_video/CDYEBIoWoAEduAq.mp4


Yes, you read that right – a bumper sticker on a cat.



The campaign even used the image as part of an email to their supporters promoting the new bumper sticker.

Hillary’s new bumper sticker advert…or her ominous future as a cat lady?

Naturally, people on Twitter had some interesting responses as to where they would put their Hillary bumper stickers

Southern_Patriot™ ‎@LanceTruPatriot

@HillaryClinton Send mine to Benghazi and the Ambassadors wife. That's if the bumper sticker copy is still on your email server

1:59 PM - 25 Apr 2015

The Clintons have typically been viewed as pet lovers, rescuing Socks, a stray cat whom Buzzfeed called “the most beloved Clinton.” They also had a pet dog, Buddy, while living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/04/3070...-places-paste/


Of course, they gave Socks to a secretary just as they moved out of the White House, and Buddy disappeared shortly after they moved to New York. No more fuzzy wuzzy photo ops ... didn't need the pets anymore.

Socks Clinton (1989 – February 20, 2009) was the pet cat of U.S. President Bill Clinton's family during his presidency. As an adopted stray cat, he was the only pet of the Clintons during the early years of the administration, and his likeness hosted the children's version of the White House website.[1] After Clinton left office, Socks resided with former Clinton secretary Betty Currie and her husband, owing to continuing conflicts with Clinton's dog Buddy.[2][3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socks_(cat)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddy_(dog)

Why Hillary Clinton’s pro-choice stance is incredibly racist

Written by Michele Hickford, Editor-in-Chief on April 28, 2015

http://allenbwest.com/2015/04/why-hi...edibly-racist/