+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 46 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 ... LastLast
Results 100 to 110 of 502
Like Tree181Likes

Thread: Obama KNEW ... and lied to the American people

  1. #100
    C & P Queen Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    58,728
    Thanks
    2,649
    Thanked 4,898 Times in 3,016 Posts
    Collins 'troubled' by Rice comments on Benghazi attack
    By Julian Pecquet - 11/28/12 12:02 PM ET

    Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) on Wednesday became the latest GOP senator to raise questions about Susan Rice.

    After an almost two-hour meeting with the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Collins said she's unconvinced by Rice's explanation of her role after the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, Libya. “I continue to be troubled by the fact that the UN ambassador decided to play what was essentially a political role at the height of a contentious presidential election ... by agreeing to go on the Sunday shows to present the administration's position,” the top Republican on the Homeland Security Committee said.

    Collins, a centrist Republican who would be a key vote for Rice if President Obama nominates her as his next secretary of State, also said she is concerned about Rice's role in denying security requests prior to the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombings in Africa.

    Collins's statement comes after three key Senate Republicans said Tuesday they were “more troubled” than ever after meeting with Rice, who had been seen as a front-runner to get the nod for secretary of State. The U.S. ambassador's apparent failure to win over any Republicans during her two-day visit to Capitol Hill has thrown that nomination into serious doubt.

    Collins said Rice told her she ignored statements from Libya's own president linking the attack to al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists because she was relying on U.S. intelligence. “I don't understand why she wouldn't have at least qualified her response” on the Sept. 16 Sunday shows, Collins said. Rice said on Sept. 16 that the attack that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans appeared to have spun out of a peaceful protest against an anti-Islam video but that the intelligence was preliminary.

    Collins also raised new questions about Rice's role in the 1998 embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, when she was then-President Clinton's assistant secretary of State for African Affairs — tying it with GOP concerns that the Obama administration turned down Stevens's requests for more security prior to the attack. “What troubles me so much is the Benghazi attack in many ways echoes the attacks on both embassies in 1998, when Susan Rice was head of the African region for our State Department,” Collins said. “In both cases, the ambassador begged for additional security.”

    Collins said Rice told her “she was not involved directly in turning down the requests.”

    “But surely,” Collins added, “given her position .. she had to be aware of the general threat assessment and the ambassadors' repeated requests for more security ... [h]er actions — and whether or not lessons were learned from the 1998 attacks on our embassies in Africa — are important questions.”

    “I would need to get additional information before I could support her nomination” to be secretary of State, Collins concluded.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affa...bassy-bombings
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #101
    Registered User boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,765
    Thanks
    317
    Thanked 344 Times in 211 Posts
    I think we are all responsible human beings and have faced daily problems but as adults, if we are not convinced of something we ask questions and we don't rely on someone else finding out the answers. Her responses are as if a person was driving down the street and noticed an ambulance with lights and sirens going and but not pulling over to let them pass....and when the policeman asked the driver why they did not pull over, the driver responds that they were waiting for someone of authority to tell them to move over.

  4. #102
    C & P Queen Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    58,728
    Thanks
    2,649
    Thanked 4,898 Times in 3,016 Posts
    Jay Carney: Obama “Not Particularly Concerned” Whether or not He or Susan Rice Misled The American People…(Video)
    November, 28, 2012 — nicedeb

    Fascinating.

    As Republicans try to get to the bottom of who provided the bogus talking points to UN Ambassador Susan Rice, the White House continues to dissimulate.

    In a his snippy response to a question from Major Garrett on whether the Obama administration’s mishandling of Benghazi raises “core questions of basic competency,” press secretary Jay Carney claimed that Barack Obama “is not particularly concerned” about whether he or Susan Rice called the terrorists (whom he called “extremists”) “al Qaeda” or not, as if that was an answer to what the question was.

    Via The Weekly Standard: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...le_664134.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=fORePNOHqQo

    Hey Carney. Who told you and Rice to go out and tell the American people that the “best intelligence” showed that the attack was the result of a spontaneous protest over a YouTube video?

    Why did you and Rice persist in disseminating the misleading information to the American people for many days after the truth was known?

    Why didn’t Susan Rice come forward sooner to admit she was wrong?

    Why was the real cause of the attack (al Qaeda tied terrorism) omitted from the talking points?

    What was His Highness doing on the night of the attack? Did he watch any of it as it was being streamed live in the Situation Room, or would that have interfered too much with his beauty sleep?

    Who told the hapless Rice that al Qaeda had been decimated?

    As the President is considering her for his next Secretary of State, that last question should especially concern him — because she sounded pretty stupid out there when she said it.

    One more question for reporters: Why do you guys allow Carney to brush you off like that? Why don’t you follow up by demanding the truth instead of feebly accepting the Regime’s standard B.S. day after day?

    Yesterday, Carney tried to discourage BenghaziGate questions by telling reporters, “There Are No Unanswered Questions” about Rice’s Appearances on Sunday Shows.

    UPDATE: Carney Slams GOP “Obsession” With Rice’s Sunday Show Comments On Benghazi… http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/28/c...s-on-benghazi/

    MORE: Obama Says He “Couldn’t Be Prouder” Of Susan Rice, Calls Her “Extraordinary”… http://weaselzippers.us/2012/11/28/o...extraordinary/

    Of course he does.

    http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2012/11...n-peoplevideo/

    comments

    SpokesModel Carney lied again when he asserted BHO (or anyone in this admin) is interested in finding out what happened in Benghazi. They were watching in real time! They don’t need to find out. They need to come clean. The question of who edited the talking points gets directly to their motivation for not coming clean on what they already know about the event itself.

    ..

    Yeah, I love how the people who were supposedly watching these events, occasionally refer to an ‘investigation’ into who did what that night. Um, *you* were there. Why do we need an investigation? Just tell us what you did, jerks.
    hblueeyes and boopster like this.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  5. #103
    Registered User boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute boopster has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,765
    Thanks
    317
    Thanked 344 Times in 211 Posts
    could this administration believe that if you surround yourself with 'dumb' people it will make you look smart? personally what I am hearing from this administration makes me believe that this administration thinks that all americans are not only gullible but lack most of their brain cells

  6. #104
    C & P Queen Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    58,728
    Thanks
    2,649
    Thanked 4,898 Times in 3,016 Posts
    December 06, 2012
    Politicizing The Benghazi Intel

    The Washington Beacon reports that the CIA was behind the politicization and sterilization of the Benghazi talking points. http://freebeacon.com/politicizing-the-truth/

    And why might they have wanted to do that? In addition to the obvious political reasons, the NY Times gives us a new one http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/wo...-hands.html?hp - the Obama Administration, presumably through the CIA, had given the wink to Qatar to arm Libyan rebels back during the undeclared 'kinetic action'. Some of those arms (surprise!) found their way to militant Islamists, although no one seems to know whether the specific group that attacked the Benghazi consulate was a beneficiary of US largesse.

    Eggs, omelettes. Interesting to see the Times actually poking at this

    http://justoneminute.typepad.com/mai...azi-intel.html

    This type of report has been going around for a long time: http://pjmedia.com/barryrubin/2012/1...oreign-policy/

    If he was, as accounts by sources in the U.S. intelligence community suggested, negotiating with a terrorist, anti-American group to obtain the return of U.S. weapons provided during the civil war, that would have been a much higher-priority matter. I have been asked by sources not to reveal the specific weapons system that was Washington’s highest priority to buy back, but the details make sense.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  7. #105
    C & P Queen Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    58,728
    Thanks
    2,649
    Thanked 4,898 Times in 3,016 Posts
    Obama admin approved secret weapons deals that ended up arming Islamists in Libya
    posted at 11:31 am on December 6, 2012 by Ed Morrissey

    Oopsie! In what has to be one of the least-shocking outcomes of Barack Obama’s Libyan adventure, the New York Times reports that his administration secretly gave approval of weapons shipments to Libyan resistance fighters, only to learn that the weapons ended up arming Islamist terror networks. Who could have seen that coming, right? http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/wo...ist-hands.html

    The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.

    No evidence has emerged linking the weapons provided by the Qataris during the uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi to the attack that killed four Americans at the United States diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, in September.

    But in the months before, the Obama administration clearly was worried about the consequences of its hidden hand in helping arm Libyan militants, concerns that have not previously been reported. The weapons and money from Qatar strengthened militant groups in Libya, allowing them to become a destabilizing force since the fall of the Qaddafi government.
    Maybe we can offer an alternative headline for this: Reporting that might have been valuable before the election. Tammy Bruce tweeted: http://www.tammybruce.com/

    Tammy Bruce@HeyTammyBruce


    A month after the election the NYT tells us: "U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell Into Jihadis’ Hands" nytimes.com/2012/12/06/wor…

    6 Dec 12
    This is yet another indictment of the Obama approach to decapitating regimes. In the immediate aftermath of the fall of Qaddafi, the administration didn’t hesitate to favorably compare the outcome in Libya to that in Iraq, where hundreds of thousands of American troops were used to secure the gains after the fall of Saddam Hussein. The NYT provides a post-mortem on that strategy courtesy of a former State Department adviser on the region:

    The Qatari assistance to fighters viewed as hostile by the United States demonstrates the Obama administration’s continuing struggles in dealing with the Arab Spring uprisings, as it tries to support popular protest movements while avoiding American military entanglements. Relying on surrogates allows the United States to keep its fingerprints off operations, but also means they may play out in ways that conflict with American interests.

    “To do this right, you have to have on-the-ground intelligence and you have to have experience,” said Vali Nasr, a former State Department adviser who is now dean of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, part of Johns Hopkins University. “If you rely on a country that doesn’t have those things, you are really flying blind. When you have an intermediary, you are going to lose control.”
    And when you don’t have any way to control what happens on the ground, you can bet that “control” will be the first thing to go. The US knew that Islamist terrorists operated in eastern Libya for years before Obama came into office. Al-Qaeda recruited heavily in the region for its fight against the US in Iraq. Decapitating Qaddafi meant losing pressure on AQ and other Islamist terror networks, and flooding the area with uncontrolled weapons almost guaranteed that the already-organized terror networks would hijack them from other less-organized resistance movements.

    But this brings up another important question. The Obama administration knew that the Islamist terror networks ended up controlling many if not most of these weapons, and had become much more dangerous as a result. If that’s the case, how could they possibly have left the consulate in Benghazi as unprotected as it was?

    http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/0...ists-in-libya/
    pepperpot likes this.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  8. #106
    C & P Queen Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    58,728
    Thanks
    2,649
    Thanked 4,898 Times in 3,016 Posts


    December 15, 2012
    Hillary Clinton Will Not Testify on Benghazi Attack on Thursday Because of Concussion

    Fox News Channel reported http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/12/15...has-concussion earlier that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton fainted and sustained a concussion this week while suffering from a stomach virus. James Rosen just reported that Clinton will be unable to testify on December 20 about Benghazi before the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee due to her concussion.
    http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/12/15...of-concussion/


    Last edited by Jolie Rouge; 12-17-2012 at 07:13 PM.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  9. #107
    go ahead....I dare ya pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute pepperpot has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    exactly where I should be...
    Posts
    9,434
    Thanks
    4,644
    Thanked 4,076 Times in 2,263 Posts
    How convenient.
    Mrs Pepperpot is a lady who always copes with the tricky situations that she finds herself in....

  10. #108
    C & P Queen Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    58,728
    Thanks
    2,649
    Thanked 4,898 Times in 3,016 Posts
    12/18/2012
    Sec Clinton’s Concussion
    [Guest post by JD]

    I am sure that it is just a coincidence that she now claims to be unable to testify. Like last time when it was so very crucial for her to be wherever she was, East Timor or Australia or Greenland. If she is injured, I wish her well in her recovery. I question the timing

    http://patterico.com/2012/12/18/sec-...ns-concussion/.


    Clinton And Kerry Get A Free Ride From The Press
    Posted 12/17/2012 07:12 PM ET


    Politics: Diplomacy involves considerable travel. What it shouldn't include is free rides from both the media and political establishment. But Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are getting just that as the guard changes at State.

    Outside the frothy bubble of U.S. political concerns lie only the hard realities of the real world. That's why hard questions should be asked — and real answers demanded — of U.S. secretaries of state and those who would be them.

    That's not the case with either Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who puts up excuse after excuse to avoid testifying on the U.S.' biggest foreign policy failure in Libya, while her would-be successor, John Kerry, wins plaudits from the media despite a long record of anti-Americanism and bad foreign policy calls.

    Clinton claims she can't testify for Congress on Thursday because she fell down over the weekend and got a concussion. Maybe so, but thus far no one's seen a medical report. What's more, it's the second time Clinton has put off crucial congressional testimony about the murder of a U.S. ambassador and three other U.S. officials by Islamist terrorists in Benghazi, Libya, last Sept. 11. The previous time, she had more pressing business, tasting wine in Australia and checking up on East Timor.

    It looks like avoidance of responsibility to preserve her own political viability. Clinton is believed to harbor political ambitions for 2016, but the fact that the State Department failed to provide enough security to embassy personnel, failed to come to their aid after their calls during the attack, and had live video showing just how bad the attacks were, were all her responsibility.

    Worse still, her State Department took part in the Obama administration's effort to convince Americans that the deaths were not from terrorist attacks, but were merely a side effect of a spontaneous anti-American demonstration that got out of hand after a U.S.-made anti-Islamic video incited the mobs.

    With Clinton avoiding testimony a second time, what is she hiding? And why are the media so incurious?

    Just as strangely, the media are remarkably full of cheerleading vigor about the naming of Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., to succeed Clinton at state in January.

    Kerry is being hailed by fellow senators as a lion of foreign policy in the Senate and drawing op-eds calling him "a good fit." That includes influential foreign policy columnists such as David Ignatius, who echoed the Washington establishment in saying, "The fact that Kerry is a known commodity, with a predictable, reliable persona, is one of his strengths."


    Read More At IBD: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editor...#ixzz2FR6NMF00
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  11. #109
    C & P Queen Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    58,728
    Thanks
    2,649
    Thanked 4,898 Times in 3,016 Posts
    During the Foster death investigations, like Benghazi, investigators were also thwarted, stonewalled, and unable to perform their jobs

    The Fix is in: Hillary’s Benghazi cover-up—like Vince Foster death investigation


    If past is prologue expect the Benghazi investigations to be covered up whether or not Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifies. According to Foreign Policy Magazine http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/po..._on_benghazi_1 that despite the House and Senate foreign relations committees having announced she would testify on Benghazi this week, the State Department said last Thursday “that’s not a done deal.” On Saturday, the deal was undone when it was announced that Hillary would not testify due to health issues http://www.examiner.com/article/hill...nsulate-attack but would be able to continue to work from home.

    Recall how it was Clinton who was one of the first top Obama administration officials to mislead the public by falsely blaming a YouTube video for the deadly attack. ://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBNS8EkAmXo&feature=share&list=UUI7ouCVOhX h5Sq-IJrpBh7w President Barack Obama, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and White House Press Secretary James Carney toed-the-line http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/10/world/...nts/index.html and repeated the same falsehood knowing it would be reported as the truth by the media.

    Since then it has been revealed that the Obama-Clinton regime watched the terrorist attack take place via live feeds, knew within two hours that the Islamist militia group Ansar al-Sharia took credit for it, and declined life-saving requests for help.

    On September 11, 2012, a terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, killed four Americans: Ambassador Christopher Stevens, former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty, Tyrone Woods and Sean Smith, a computer expert.

    What you witnessed from the Obama-Clinton regime is called “cohesive strategy.” We have seen that cover-up tactic before. It was successfully used by the Clinton White House during the investigations of the Clinton era as documented in The Whistleblower: How the Clinton White Stayed in Power to Reemerge in the Obama White House and on the World Stage. Additionally, it notably appears in my latest book, Following Orders: The Death of Vince Foster, Clinton White House Lawyer. Cohesive strategy is a smoke and mirrors public relations trick where the White House tells Americans and investigators what they want them to know as opposed to what really happened, and how their scripted version becomes the so-called truth, the ‘talking points,’ the narrative picked up by the media.

    It was on July 20, 1993 when Vince Foster, President Bill Clinton’s childhood friend and Hillary Clinton’s closest White House confidante, was found dead of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound in the head in Fort Marcy Park, Virginia. Before a preliminary investigation began, Americans were told by White House officials and President Clinton that Vince Foster committed suicide in Fort Marcy Park, nobody saw it coming, and it would remain a “mystery”—the cohesive strategy crafted in Hillary’s White House counsel’s office. Clinton Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers even stated: “the Park Service Police is the only agency that’s investigating [Vince Foster’s death], and that the objective of their search is simply to determine that it was a suicide.”

    The fix was in. The objective of the investigation into Vince Foster’s death, the highest ranking government official’s death since President John Kennedy was assassinated, was “simply to determine that it was a suicide [emphasis mine].” The conclusion was predetermined. The cohesive strategy stuck as “truth” and they got away with it. Homicide, foul play, the possibility of blackmail, a potential risk to America’s national security, was never investigated. No need for the Clinton White House to cooperate with investigators or the media. They didn’t. Case closed. Move on….

    And now Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House are following the same cover-up playbook in Benghazi.

    As any seasoned investigator or investigative journalist will confirm, evidence gathering at the time of the incident is critical to finding out the truth. Anything less can lead investigators to an incorrect, rationalized, and skewed conclusion that covers-up the truth.

    The fact that it took the Obama-Clinton regime nearly a month before the FBI was permitted to gather evidence in Benghazi is the proof. According to the Associated Press, FBI “agents arrived in Benghazi before dawn…. and departed after sunset, after weeks of waiting for access to the crime scene to investigate the Sept. 11 attack (emphasis mine).”

    Those with eyes to see and ears to hear know that means the crime scene was already contaminated and compromised—all the evidence that was gathered (whatever remained) is suspect. If the Obama-Clinton regime were serious about finding out the truth, the U.S. military with FBI agents would have been at the Benghazi CIA outpost immediately after the attack. Anything short of that tells us the administration does want Americans to know what happened that deadly day. Remember Ambassador Christopher Stevens was following their orders.

    During the Foster death investigations, like Benghazi, investigators were also thwarted, stonewalled, and unable to perform their jobs. Hillary denied them “unfettered” access to Foster’s office, and some evidence was contaminated or outright withheld (despite being subpoenaed). The initial investigation was at best—shoddy. Papers from Vince Fosters' office where later found in the Clintons' private quaters.

    From Following Orders: The Death of Vince Foster, Clinton White House Lawyer, source: Kenneth W. Starr, Independent Counsel, Report on the Death of Vincent W. Foster, October 10, 1997, p. 14, Lee Report at 485.

    “A perfect reconstruction [of Vince Foster’s death].... was not possible…. The reasons include the lack of complete documentation of the original shooting scene; the lack of subsequent records and photographs of each item of physical evidence prior to examinations; the lack of documentation of the amount of blood, tissue, and bone fragments in the areas at the scene under and around Foster’s head; the lack of close-up photographs of any definite patterns and quantity of the blood stains on Foster’s clothing and body at the scene; and the unknown location of the fatal bullet, which makes complete reconstruction of the bullet trajectory difficult.”
    Therefore the investigators had no choice but to draw a conclusion in the Foster case based on the “available evidence.” “Available evidence” does not always mean an accurate conclusion.

    The only question that remains today is whether or not Hillary Clinton gets away with another cover-up, like she did in the Vince Foster case, and runs for President in 2016, or will she finally be held accountable, and Americans learn the truth about the Benghazi terrorist attack?

    To get the inside scope in Benghazi follow Director of Northeast Intelligence Network and Senior CFP columnist Doug Hagmann’s exclusive “intelligence insider” reporting. http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/ http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51679


    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51811
    Last edited by Jolie Rouge; 12-18-2012 at 09:58 PM.
    pepperpot likes this.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  12. #110
    C & P Queen Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    58,728
    Thanks
    2,649
    Thanked 4,898 Times in 3,016 Posts
    comments

    ... Hillary would not testify due to health issues ... but would be able to continue to work from home...
    why cant she testify from home? the government certainly has the technology to do that.

    ...

    Corruption at the top levels of government has been going on for a long time. The Clinton's and Obama Administration stand out as more recent in this respect. They have lied so many times, I don't think they know what the truth is anymore.

    If anyone thought Ms. Clinton would testify truthfully, or testify at all, they should think back to here testifying in the Clinton Administration. She couldn't recall or didn't remember how many hundreds of times. And, for someone with such a bad memory, how in the world could she have ever qualified for Sec. of State. She didn't! The corrupt crowd just refuse to get off the stage.

    People have a long memory. It is just a matter of when they realize corruption affects us all, and get up off their duff and do something about it.
    ..

    So, we have a high placed staffer at 65 years old, faints, hits her head, somehow is diagnosed with a concussion, but no hospital visit? Really?

    The last time she was to testify, the wine tasting event in Australia,was more important for her to attend.
    Is anyone buying this Bull? Nice try at an excuse, but it doesn't hold water. But, it is very transparent, which is a new thing with this admin

    ..


    I grew up with the Clintons at the helm most of my life. They are two of the most corrupt and evil people on this planet. I too, have often wondered why they won't throw Obama under the bus given that he stole the primary from Hillary (much in the same way he got his senate seat by invalidating his opponents signatures and unsealing messy divorce records), but from what I gather, she doesn't want to be responsible for bringing this show down. (clearly it implicates her and doesn't bode well for the Dems overall) Nothing is beyond reach for her and Bill, and nothing is beneath them. I grew up with and went to school with Don Henry and Kevin Ives. (Boys on The Tracks) My mother once worked with the lying medical examiner that proclaimed them so stoned out of their minds they passed out on the train tracks. One of the mothers is still on a path to find out and bring to justice those who murdered them. Nothing will happen to Hillary, I assure you for as much as they have on Obama, Obama has something over them. You don't envelop yourself in an evil circle and not have enemies

    ..

    There's no Benghazi Consulate listed on the Embassy web site.

    On Aug 26 Ambassador Stevens gave a speech in which he officially opened the Consular Section of the Tripoli Embassy. In his speech he made reference to finally being able to answer the question he was repeatedly asked "When will you start issuing visas"? His answer was "we'll start issuing visas tomorrow {Aug 27, 2012)". When you read the speech you understand that there was no Consulate in Benghazi otherwise it would have been issuing visas. The other thing to remember is that the Ambassador arrived in Tripoli in May 2012. It seems to me like he may have been in the process of opening up a Consulate in Benghazi but hadn't b/c he had only been in country about 90 days.

    All of the people involved are lying through their teeth. And when it is all said and done everyone involved will get a pass. Our fiascoes always end up the same way; no one will be held accountable and all that will be said is that the men died in service to their country. Nothing further needs to be done here. Let's move on to the next operation.

    Russia has a naval base in Libya and it won't lose this stronghold. China has billions invested in the Middle East. China exports billions to the area. Neither wants to lose or weaken their position. Both of them support Assad. And let's not forget Iran supports Assad too. So who gave the rebels the surface-to-air missile they used to shoot down the helicopter reported on FNC? More importantly would be to find out where the SAM came from.

    ..


    No surprise there. Didn't it seem kind of odd that they marched the UN ambasador out in front of the public that was a State Department issue? The A-Hole in Chief even asked why those old white guys were picking on Rice when she didn't have anything to do with Benghazi. DUH? And now, the wench doesn't have to testify before an investigating committee?

    Hillary, the carpet-bagger, and her lying husband should not be underestimated on how low they would go to keep themselves at or near the top of the power structure.

    The fix is in (and we aren't debating the meaning of "is" here). These lowlifes will cover themselves and come out smelling like a rose. And worse yet, the carpet-bagger will throw her name into the hat come 2016 and the moronic liberals will support her all the way.

    I guess lying, murder, and gross incompetence don't fall under the "social justice" purview

    ..

    Might want to Google The "Clinton Corpse Count"...will be quite the eye opener.
    This was long before Bill ran for President.

    ..

    How do you get out of testifying? Can the average person do such a thing? Seeing as how she's not the "average" citizen, that she is employed by the average citizens of this country, shouldn't she be held to a higher standard and made to testify? How convenient that she suddenly has a concussion, wonder if that excuse would work for me? And if she is so ill as they would like us to presume, why can't she be interviewed at home with a court reporter, judge and lawyer taking her statements? I find this all too much.....that this event will disappear as many things have happened in these so called public representatives....

    ..

    She has her hands in this up to her elbows, and yet is getting a free pass. Are you kidding me? Just like Obama -- no accountability

    ..

    Thank you for a very insightful article. Anyone who has been paying attention to the Benghazi travesty has known from the beginning that Hillary would never testify (even though, IMO, she is knee deep smack dab in the middle of the coverup/lies). . .and IMO, the GOP are complicit. Can't have her testimony hanging around her neck when she goes to run in 2016. . .Benghazi, just like every illegal thing the Clintons have been involved with will be glossed over and the GOP will continue to look the other way. Is there anyone in a position of authority who will have the courage to stand up and speak out and be able to actually do something about all the abuses of power; illegal activities; unconstitutional commands that that have been perpetrated by the current regime, and that includes Hills and Bill (because you know his grubby paws are all over her not testifying)?


    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?


 
+ Reply to Thread
Page 10 of 46 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts