Page 11 of 12 First ... 789101112 Last
  1. #111
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    ... as Planned Parenthood victoriously reported, 333,964 of them last year never got a chance to open their mouths.
    It slices, stabs, chemical burns, and vacuums humans to death for $500-$900 a head.
    Big Business ... 333,964 "clients" X $700.00 @ = $233774800.00
    annually - that is REPORTED and only thru one venue.


    Last edited by Jolie Rouge; 04-30-2013 at 02:54 PM.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement Undercover at Planned Parenthood
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #112
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Liberals would like to have you believe that abortions only happen safely, legally and rarely. These undercover videos form Live Action show something completely different.

    New undercover videos from Live Action showing some callous conversations with late-term abortion staffers and doctors. Nothing in these videos is on par with Gosnell's sick house o' horrors, but it's still pretty disturbing.

    http://www.humanevents.com/2013/04/2...rtion-horrors/

    If you think late term abortions are murder, click LIKE and SHARE! (This video MUST BE SEEN BY ALL!)
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  4. #113
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Journal of Medical Ethics Publishes Article Advocating After-Birth Abortion
    Posted on Wednesday, 29 February 2012

    The Journal of Medical Ethics (JME), which describes itself as ‘an international peer-reviewed journal for health professionals and researchers in medical ethics’, has published an article which takes pro-choice arguments to their logical conclusion and advocates post-birth abortion. The journal is published by the BMJ Group, which is wholly owned by the British Medical Association, itself the professional organization representing the interests of British doctors.

    In the article, entitled After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?, ethicists Alberto Giubilini of Monash University, Australia, and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbourne, argue that fetuses and newborn babies share the same ‘moral status’, and that the arguments in favour of abortion therefore apply equally to newborns. They conclude:

    If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the fetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/201...e-ed3653bbd0dd


    The equivalent status of pre and postnatal children has long been a key argument of pro-life advocates. Anthony Ozimic from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children told The Huffington Post:

    The paper proves what pro-lifers have long been arguing: that the common arguments for abortion also justify infanticide. There is no difference in moral status between a child one day before birth and a child one day after birth. Birth is merely a change of location, not a change from non-personhood to personhood. Killing Newborn Babies No Different To Abortion, Say Medical Ethicists http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012...n_1309985.html
    Some see the JME paper as potentially helping the pro-life cause by showing the inconsistency of the pro-choice position. Writing for the National Catholic Register, Matthew Archbold gave his reaction to the JME paper:

    Here’s the thing – they’re right. If you accept their premises, they’re absolutely right.

    The second we allow ourselves to become the arbiters of who is human and who isn’t, this is the calamitous yet inevitable end. Once you say all human life is not sacred, the rest is just drawing random lines in the sand.

    An ethicist’s job is like a magician’s. The main job of both is to distract you from the obvious. The magician uses sleight of hand to pretend to make people disappear. But when ethicists do it, people disappear for real.

    It’s almost a pro-life argument in that it highlights the absurdity of the pro-abortion argument.

    Ethicists Argue for Post Birth Abortions http://www.ncregister.com/blog/matth...#ixzz1nacpxVOj
    Giubilini and Minerva argue from the premise that unborn children and infants are merely potential persons, and so their intentional killing is permissible. This assumption is based upon the argument that sentience is a requisite attribute of personhood. The authors write:

    In spite of the oxymoron in the expression, we propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide’, to emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditional sense are performed) rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk. Accordingly, a second terminological specification is that we call such a practice ‘after-birth abortion’ rather than ‘euthanasia’ because the best interest of the one who dies is not necessarily the primary criterion for the choice, contrary to what happens in the case of euthanasia.


    The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.

    Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’. We take ‘person’ to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her. This means that many non-human animals and mentally retarded human individuals are persons, but that all the individuals who are not in the condition of attributing any value to their own existence are not persons. Merely being human is not in itself a reason for ascribing someone a right to life. Indeed, many humans are not considered subjects of a right to life: spare embryos where research on embryo stem cells is permitted, fetuses where abortion is permitted, criminals where capital punishment is legal.

    After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
    This argument is not new. As Matthew Flannagan wrote in an article published in the Summer 2009 edition of Ethics and Medicine – An International Journal of Bioethics:

    Common in the literature on feticide is the argument that killing an organism is not homicide unless the organism’s brain has developed enough for it to acquire sentience, the capacity for consciousness and the ability to perceive pleasure and pain.

    Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part I
    Flannagan goes on to show the problem of using the non-sentience of the unborn child as justification for abortion:

    Despite its pervasive appeal, there are some prima facie problems with such an account. In chapter 3 of A Defense of Abortion, Boonin reviews various accounts and notes that they all fail for similar reasons. Boonin notes that those who attempt to ground humanity in the amount of brain development an organism has undergone face a dilemma: “Any appeal to what a brain can do at various stages of development would seem to have to appeal to what the brain can already do. Or to what the brain has the potential to do in the future.”

    Either option leads to problems for a defender of the permissibility of feticide who does not also want to endorse infanticide. This is because “by any plausible measure dogs, and cats, cows and pigs, chickens and ducks are more intellectually developed than a new born infant.” Suppose, then, one takes the first horn and appeals to what the brain can already do. However, unless one wishes to affirm that cats, dogs and chickens are human beings, “appeals to what the brain can already do” will “be unable to account for the presumed wrongness of killing toddlers or infants.”

    Suppose, then, one takes up the second horn of the dilemma and appeals to “what the brain has the potential to do in the future.” Boonin notes that this will entail that feticide is homicide. “If [such an account] allows appeals to what the brain has the potential to do in the future, then it will have to include fetuses as soon as their brains begin to emerge, during the first few weeks of gestation.”

    Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part I http://www.mandm.org.nz/2009/07/boon...ue-part-i.html
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  5. #114
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    In the face of fierce criticism, Julian Savulescu, Editor of the JME, vigorously defended the article’s publication:

    As Editor of the Journal, I would like to defend its publication. The arguments presented, in fact, are largely not new and have been presented repeatedly in the academic literature and public fora by the most eminent philosophers and bioethicists in the world, including Peter Singer, Michael Tooley and John Harris in defence of infanticide, which the authors call after-birth abortion.

    The novel contribution of this paper is not an argument in favour of infanticide – the paper repeats the arguments made famous by Tooley and Singer – but rather their application in consideration of maternal and family interests. The paper also draws attention to the fact that infanticide is practised in the Netherlands.

    Many people will and have disagreed with these arguments. However, the goal of the Journal of Medical Ethics is not to present the Truth or promote some one moral view. It is to present well reasoned argument based on widely accepted premises. The authors provocatively argue that there is no moral difference between a fetus and a newborn. Their capacities are relevantly similar. If abortion is permissible, infanticide should be permissible. The authors proceed logically from premises which many people accept to a conclusion that many of those people would reject.

    Of course, many people will argue that on this basis abortion should be recriminalised. Those arguments can be well made and the Journal would publish a paper than made such a case coherently, originally and with application to issues of public or medical concern. The Journal does not specifically support substantive moral views, ideologies, theories, dogmas or moral outlooks, over others. It supports sound rational argument. Moreover, it supports freedom of ethical expression. The Journal welcomes reasoned coherent responses to After-Birth Abortion. Or indeed on any topic relevant to medical ethics.

    What is disturbing is not the arguments in this paper nor its publication in an ethics journal. It is the hostile, abusive, threatening responses that it has elicited. More than ever, proper academic discussion and freedom are under threat from fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society.

    “Liberals Are Disgusting”: In Defence of the Publication of “After-Birth Abortion” http://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/...irth-abortion/

    Writing for the Telegraph newspaper, Will Heaven observes that it is unsurprising that there is reaction when supporting ‘freedom of ethical expression’ includes the provision of a platform for the overt advocacy of infanticide:

    Now Julian Savulescu, the Editor of the Journal of Medical Ethics, is complaining that the authors – both leading ethicists – have received “personally abusive correspondence”, most of which is anonymous, “threatening their lives and personal safety”.

    Which doesn’t surprise me, not that I approve of such harassment. You can’t be unashamedly pro killing babies and not expect controversy.

    ‘After-birth abortion’ is logically sound: that’s why it will boost the pro-life movement http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/wi...life-movement/
    Kenneth Boyd, Associate Editor of the JME, was as unapologetic as Savulescu:
    Coming up to me at a meeting the other day, an ethics colleague waved a paper at me. “Have you seen this ?” she asked, “It’s unbelievable!” The paper was “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?” by two philosophers writing from Australia, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.

    Well yes, I agreed, I had seen it: in fact I had been the editor responsible for deciding that it should be published in the Journal of Medical Ethics; and no, I didn’t think it was unbelievable, since I know that arguing strongly for a position with which many people will disagree and some even find offensive, is something that philosophers are often willing, and may even feel they have a duty, to do, in order that their arguments may be tested in the crucible of debate with other philosophers who are equally willing to argue strongly against them.

    Of course for that debate to take place in the Journal of Medical Ethics, many of whose readers, doctors and health care workers as well as philosophers, may well disagree, perhaps strongly, with the paper’s arguments, we needed first to make sure that the paper, like any other submitted to the Journal, was of sufficient academic quality for us to publish; and the normal way in which we determine this is to invite academics in relevant disciplines to review the paper critically for us, so that we can eventually make an informed decision about whether or not to publish it, either in its original or (as in this case) a form revised in the light of the reviewers’ reports.

    Handling Editor Defends Decision: After – Birth Abortion http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk...irth-abortion/
    http://blog.betterthansacrifice.org/...irth-abortion/

    So if the "Pro-choice" can justify killing a baby becuase it is "inconvient" - or the "wrong" gender... it is sadly the next logical step to have an "After – Birth Abortion" because the eyes are the wrong shape - or the hair is the wrong color - or maybe the baby is just ~ ugly ??
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  6. #115
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Headline of the day: “Fetus” found in high school bathroom?
    posted at 12:01 pm on May 2, 2013 by Ed Morrissey

    Excuse me? Isn’t a fetus outside the womb an actual baby?

    Not according to the Central PA Patriot-News, apparently, and not just in the headline: http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/ind...incart_m-rpt-1

    A 19-year-old McCaskey East High School student was charged with concealing the death of a child after she reportedly gave birth to a fetus that was found dead in a school bathroom Tuesday night.

    Cherlie LaFleur, of the 300 block of North Marshall Street, was identified by police and school resource Officer David Shell after they reviewed school surveillance footage and conducted extensive interviews at the school where the male infant was apparently born prematurely Tuesday night, according to a Lancaster city police press release.

    After giving birth in the bathroom, LaFleur allegedly tried to flush the infant down a toilet and, when that failed, she put it in a trash can, police said.

    http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/ind..._river_default
    Yes, it’s an infant after it emerges from the birth canal, not a fetus. In other words, a baby — in this case, which its mother tried to toss away.

    Mollie Hemingway is aghast at the reporting, as is Steven Greydanus:

    Mollie Z. Hemingway @MZHemingway

    If you kill a "fetus," like Planned Parenthood does a thousand times a day, it's legal. This headline is bad. http://bit.ly/ZpA9z9

    10:43 AM - 2 May 2013
    Steven D. Greydanus @DecentFilms

    The lede is worse: "…she reportedly gave birth to a fetus that was found dead…"

    10:47 AM - 2 May 2013
    Steven D. Greydanus @DecentFilms

    "Gave birth to a fetus"? Really? Has anyone in the history of English ever talked about "giving birth to a fetus"? @MZHemingway

    10:48 AM - 2 May 2013
    http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives...hool-bathroom/

    See how the left gradually changes the vernacular? This is not a bug, it’s a feature.

    Pretty soon a “fetus” will be a baby the mother doesn’t want, and she will have a 48 hour rescission period after birth where she can ask the doctor to terminate the “fetus”. Once the mother leaves the hospital it will be considered a “baby” or “infant” as those of us that are human like to refer to them.

    These people do not even understand their own subconscious depravity, even when it comes through in their articles.

    comments

    I wonder who the babyfetus-daddy was that caused the babyfetus-bump.

    Forget viability, it’s only a “baby” if they want it.

    ..

    This was no accident. It’s all part of the dehumanization campaign of the Left…if it’s not a baby, no worries, right?

    It’s very hard for me to understand how someone can try to flush another human being down a toilet, or just toss them in the garbage…especially when it’s your own flesh and blood. We get all wound up about animal abuse stories (as we should), but things like this don’t seem to receive the same outcry. It’s a sick, sick world we live in.

    ..

    From the report via county coroner’s office it was 27 to 29 weeks — about seven months. Standard case for Gosnell. Based on the million dollar bail, that she tried to flush it and it did not fit so just tossed it in the trash. Fetus does not fit as a description. But if the coroner does find it was a miscarriage it will still just be a miscarriaged baby.... if the baby drowned when she tried to flush it - then it's murder.


    Michael & Marie were born at 28 weeks...
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  7. #116
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  8. #117
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts


    Some may say that these graphic images are not necessary...
    most of those that say that just wish to not see the reality of their actions.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Jolie Rouge For This Useful Post:

    pepperpot (05-07-2013)

  10. #118
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Protesters resort to chains, fake blood, Twisted Sister as Texas Senate nears abortion vote
    Posted at 11:13 pm on July 12, 2013 by Twitchy Staff

    The originally scheduled vote on Texas’ ban on most abortions after 20 weeks was delayed after Sen. Wendy Davis’ 11-hour filibuster devolved into a midnight scream-fest. http://twitchy.com/2013/06/26/midnig...-video-photos/ The Texas legislature was reconvened for a special session, and the state Senate closed in on another vote tonight. After 19 proposed amendments to the legislation were voted down and senators prepared for a final vote, pro-abortion protesters began chaining themselves to a railing in the gallery.

    http://twitchy.com/2013/07/12/protes...abortion-vote/

    comments

    Have you seen Tea Partiers being dragged around by cops like this? This is the face of the Democrat/Liberal/Communist party! When TP disagreed, they voted idiots out of office. When Liberals pissed, they occupied government buildings! hahaha.

    ..

    The fake blood, is that supposed to symbolize the innocent blood of unborn children that these liberal psychopaths want to bathe in? Possibly the blood of young women bleeding out from another Gosnell butcher they so desperately want to keep open...

    A law which makes abortion mill's actually be able to SAVE the life of a girl when the inevitable botched abortion happens,... THAT they equate to coat hangers?


    Deliciously brutal: Laura Ingraham demolishes Texas pro-abort Wendy Davis in one tweet
    Posted at 9:13 am on July 13, 2013 by Twitchy Staff


    Laura Ingraham ✔ @IngrahamAngle

    The Sandra Fluke of 2013. "@WendyDavisTexas: The fight for the future of TX is just beginning." #fightforlife

    7:09 AM - 13 Jul 2013
    Boom! Once again, radio host Laura Ingraham destroys late-term abortion proponent Wendy Davis in under 140 characters, this time with a stinging Sandra Fluke comparison. http://twitchy.com/2013/06/27/boom-l...-one-question/

    After the Texas Senate passed oh-so-horrifying legislation limiting late-term abortion and requiring improved safety standards at clinics http://twitchy.com/2013/07/13/texas-...-restrictions/ the state senator vowed to keep up her “heroic” fight against the right to life. http://twitchy.com/2013/06/25/celebs...dy-davis-2016/

    WendyDavisTexas

    Some believe this fight is over with this vote tonight, but they're wrong.
    The fight for the future of Texas is just beginning


    12:04 AM - 13 Jul 2013
    Hey, she’ll always have pics of tampon earrings http://twitchy.com/2013/07/12/classy...mpon-earrings/ and exploited kids http://twitchy.com/2013/07/12/keep-j...-children-pic/ to remember this moment. And don’t forget the jars of feces http://twitchy.com/2013/07/12/pro-ab...ay-the-reason/ her morally bankrupt supporters brought to the Texas Capitol. Hold on to the memories, Wendy!


    Texas Senate Passes Bill to Ban Late-Term Abortions Despite Abortion Mob
    by Steven Ertelt | Austin, TX | LifeNews.com | 7/13/13 1:00 AM


    After a day filled with pro-abortion threats, pro-life people hiding in secure areas of the capitol fearing for their safety, jars of feces and urine and protestors disrupting the Senate proceedings, democracy finally prevailed.

    Members of the state Senate approved the bill to ban late-term abortions on a 19-11 margin on second reading. The chamber then approved the bill in third reading by the same 19-11 vote.

    The bill would ban abortions after 20 weeks and hold abortion clinics accountable by making them meet basic health and safety standards that have closed facilities in other states that are unable to comply. The bill also requires all abortion clinics to meet the same health and safety regulations as an ambulatory surgical center, requires a doctor providing abortions to secure admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, and lastly, requires a doctor to personally administer the abortion-inducing drugs to the patient.

    Before the vote, Texas police issued a statement confirming they confiscated numerous jars of feces and urine that abortion activists planned to throw at pro-life legislators today who are debating the late-term abortion ban.

    As LifeNews reported, abortion activists also planned to throw tampons and feminine pads at lawmakers, but the Texas Department of Public Safety statement below confirms the planned assaults on legislators were much worse than that.

    This week saw a death threat issued to the Texas Lt. Governor and abortion activists screaming “F— the Church.”

    Texas Governor Rick Perry issued a call for a special session of the Texas legislature to pass the bill that a pro-abortion mob prevented the legislature from passing last week.“I am calling the Legislature back into session because too much important work remains undone for the people of Texas. Through their duly elected representatives, the citizens of our state have made crystal clear their priorities for our great state,” Perry said.

    “Texans value life and want to protect women and the unborn. Texans want a transportation system that keeps them moving. Texans want a court system that is fair and just. We will not allow the breakdown of decorum and decency to prevent us from doing what the people of this state hired us to do.”

    A recent national poll by The Polling Company found that, after being informed that there is scientific evidence that unborn children are capable of feeling pain at least by 20 weeks, 64% would support a law banning abortion after 20 weeks, unless the mother’s life was in danger. Only 30% said they would oppose such a law. Polling from Texas also shows support for the legislation.

    Even a Huffington Post poll found a majority of Americans support banning late abortions — on a 2-1 margin.

    The bill relies on the science of fetal pain to establish a Constitutional reason for Congress to ban abortions late in pregnancy.

    The science behind the concept of fetal pain is fully established and Dr. Steven Zielinski, an internal medicine physician from Oregon, is one of the leading researchers into it. He first published reports in the 1980s to validate research showing evidence for it. He has testified before Congress that an unborn child could feel pain at “eight-and-a-half weeks and possibly earlier” and that a baby before birth “under the right circumstances, is capable of crying.”

    He and his colleagues Dr. Vincent J. Collins and Thomas J. Marzen were the top researchers to point to fetal pain decades ago. Collins, before his death, was Professor of Anesthesiology at Northwestern University and the University of Illinois and author of Principles of Anesthesiology, one of the leading medical texts on the control of pain.

    “The functioning neurological structures necessary to suffer pain are developed early in a child’s development in the womb,” they wrote. “Functioning neurological structures necessary for pain sensation are in place as early as 8 weeks, but certainly by 13 1/2 weeks of gestation. Sensory nerves, including nociceptors, reach the skin of the fetus before the 9th week of gestation. The first detectable brain activity occurs in the thalamus between the 8th and 10th weeks. The movement of electrical impulses through the neural fibers and spinal column takes place between 8 and 9 weeks gestation. By 13 1/2 weeks, the entire sensory nervous system functions as a whole in all parts of the body,” they continued.

    With Zielinski and his colleagues the first to provide the scientific basis for the concept of fetal pain, Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand of the University of Arkansas Medical Center has provided further research to substantiate their work.

    “The neural pathways are present for pain to be experienced quite early by unborn babies,” explains Steven Calvin, M.D., perinatologist, chair of the Program in Human Rights Medicine, University of Minnesota, where he teaches obstetrics.

    Dr. Colleen A. Malloy, Assistant Professor, Division of Neonatology at Northwestern University in her testimony before the House Judiciary Committee in May 2012 said, “[w]hen we speak of infants at 22 weeks LMP [Note: this is 20 weeks post fertilization], for example, we no longer have to rely solely on inferences or ultrasound imagery, because such premature patients are kicking, moving, reacting, and developing right before our eyes in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.”

    “In today’s medical arena, we resuscitate patients at this age and are able to witness their ex-utero growth and development. Medical advancement and technology have enabled us to improve our ability to care for these infants…In fact, standard of care for neonatal intensive care units requires attention to and treatment of neonatal pain,” Dr. Malloy testified.

    She continued, “[t]hus, the difference between fetal and neonatal pain is simply the locale in which the pain occurs. The receiver’s experience of the pain is the same. I could never imagine subjecting my tiny patients to horrific procedures such as those that involve limb detachment or cardiac injection.”

    This week, a pro-abortion activist had to be removed from a hearing and another read a disgusting poem to legislators equating her vagina to a gun.

    http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/13/t...-abortion-mob/
    Last edited by Jolie Rouge; 07-13-2013 at 02:19 PM.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  11. #119
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    42nd Abortion Clinic Closed This Year Due to Filthy, Unsafe Conditions

    by Cheryl Sullenger | 8/1/13 10:00 AM

    The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services announced Wednesday that it has suspended the license of Femcare, an abortion clinic in Asheville, for two dozen serious health and safety violations discovered during a routine inspection on July 18 and 19th.

    This action comes just two days after Gov. Pat McCrory signed a law that will require abortion clinics to meet the standards of an outpatient surgery center. Ironically, it was thought that Femcare would be the only North Carolina abortion clinic to meet safety standards under the new law, but it seems it that thinking was grossly in error. Femcare was last inspected 6½ years ago. The closure is not directly related to the new law.

    This is the 42nd abortion clinic to close nationally in 2013. Clinic safety regulations have contributed to many of the closings. This number far eclipses the 24 abortion clinics that closed in 2012. Since 1991, over 70% of all abortion clinics in the U.S. have closed.

    “This is a wake-up call for abortion supporters. What they thought was a clinic that could meet high standards ended up being one with practices so shoddy and conditions so dangerous that it is not fit to operate. Many abortion supporters fought to oppose the new law. In reality, they were fighting to keep abortion clinics dangerous,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “This is the reality of abortion clinics today. We have yet to find one that complies with all laws and safety codes. The public health would be best served if they were all closed.”

    http://www.lifenews.com/2013/08/01/4...fe-conditions/
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  12. #120
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Horrifying: Planned Parenthood toasts to 97 years of murdering the unborn [pic]
    Posted at 5:12 pm on October 16, 2013

    Planned Parenthood is perhaps the most anti-birthday entity in this country, and yet:

    Planned Parenthood ✔ @PPFAQ

    Here's to 97 more years of care--no matter what.



    9:47 AM - 16 Oct 2013
    No matter what.” No matter how many babies’ lives are snuffed out like candles. Only a twisted mind could ever see what Planned Parenthood does as “care.”

    This is Planned Parenthood’s true legacy:
    343K babies would've had 1 candle this year, had it not been for Planned Parenthood.

    Gabriella Hoffman @Gabby_Hoffman

    "Let's make it Planned Parenthood's last birthday
    – so that babies across the country can make it to their first birthdays."
    -@
    LilaGraceRose


    3:09 PM - 16 Oct 2013
    http://twitchy.com/2013/10/16/horrif...he-unborn-pic/
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  13. #121
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in