Thread: Arizona County Sheriff Keeps Getting Elected Over And Over

Now ‘indisputable proof’ of Obama forgery
Written on July 17, 2012 at 7:26 am by FPP

At a news conference Tuesday in Phoenix that will be live-streamed by WND, Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse will present “indisputable proof” the Obama birth document released by the White House is a forgery, according to the posse’s lead investigator.

Mike Zullo said the new information was developed during an investigative trip to Hawaii in May.

The press conference will be held Tuesday at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. [Local time will be 2:30 p.m., as Arizona does not observe Daylight Saving Time].

http://frontporchpolitics.com/2012/0...obama-forgery/

comments

Could we just get SOMETHING out of BO?????
Maybe his transcripts from high school? college?
Maybe one of the papers that he wrote when he was President of Harvard Law Group??
Maybe his social security number information??? Oh, wait~!!
His social security number is fraudulent!! From Connecticut!!
It was issued before to someone else!! It failed E-Verify!!
BO is disgusting - through and through.

..

My sense is that Sheriff Joe is not very familiar with computers. Otherwise, he would know that he cannot authenticate the image of the birth certificate released by the White House. Computer images are not self-authenticating, and what was released is a digital image of a copy of a birth certificate. He will need to go to Hawaii and see the original, just like Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett did.
The image released is neither an authentic birth certificate NOR a forgery. It's a computer image. Using a computer image to authenticate an original document would not be admissible in any court, so what Arpaio is doing is a total waste of time.
Do you think US Customs would let you back into this country if you brought a scanned copy of your passport, instead of the real one?

^^^
Really???!!!!!!

Oh my gosh, I cannot believe how many people insist on parroting this nonsense.

Originally Posted by mosdata1

^^^
Really???!!!!!!

Oh my gosh, I cannot believe how many people insist on parroting this nonsense.

So ... if McCain had presented scanned documents and had his records sealed... you would have had no problems ?

I’ll believe that when Romney addresses the issue that the PDF that Obama claimed was his Birth Certificate and had placed on the White House web site has been declared, by an official law enforcement investigation, as “undoubtedly a fraud”.

And Hawaiian law allowed people born outside of the state (even outside the USA) to get a Hawaiian Birth Certificate.

This is an illegal immigration/national security issue.

July 17, 2012
EXHAUSTIVE INQUIRY LEADS TO NEW INFORMATION
SHERIFF’S INVESTIGATORS:“PRESIDENT’S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS UNDOUBTEDLY A FRAUD”
http://mcso.org/MultiMedia/PressRele...0Part%20II.pdf


=======================

Press Conference Video http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/sheriff-j...ss-conference/

=======================

What changes the dynamic is that calling the Sheriff a lunatic and his supporters birthers as suffering from ODS means zilch.

What has to be refuted now is evidence. It is not longer just an accusation. It is an accusation backed by evidience. If one cannot refute the evidence, one cannot refute the accusation.

Time to drop this steamy pile of smelly stuff in the President’s lap.

Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge

Oh wait! That's racist!!!!

Originally Posted by mosdata1

^^^
Really???!!!!!!

Oh my gosh, I cannot believe how many people insist on parroting this nonsense.

Sheriff Arpaio under scrutiny in racial profiling trial
By Tim Gaynor | Reuters – 3 hrs ago

PHOENIX (Reuters) - Mexican tourist Manuel Ortega Melendres was a passenger in a car pulled over by deputies of hard-line Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio during a sweep for illegal immigrants, ostensibly because the vehicle's driver was speeding. But moments later Melendres was arrested, despite having a valid visa and producing identification, while the vehicle's white driver was neither cited nor taken into custody.

Melendres' ordeal in 2007 is now at the heart of a class action lawsuit to be heard in federal court in Phoenix beginning Thursday in a case that will test whether Maricopa County Sheriff Arpaio can target the undocumented in immigration "sweeps" without racially profiling Latino citizens. The suit contends that Arpaio, who styles himself "America's toughest sheriff," and his officers violate the constitutional rights of both Hispanic citizens and legal immigrants alike in their zeal to crack down on people they believe to be illegal immigrants in the Phoenix valley. "At trial we will prove that Sheriff Arpaio's fixation on immigration enforcement and his equating of, quote, ‘illegal' with 'Latino' has resulted in systemic civil rights violations," said Cecillia Wang, director of the Immigrants Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union.

The sheriff's office "has recklessly set up a dragnet for undocumented immigrants, but in the process has violated the rights of countless Latino residents of the county, U.S. citizens and immigrants alike who cannot go about their lawful business without fear of being detained and interrogated during a pretextual traffic stop," she added.

The non-jury bench trial, which will run from July 19 to August 2, focuses attention once again on Arizona, which claimed headlines last month when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a key element of the state's crackdown on illegal immigrants requiring police to investigate those they stop and suspect of being in the country illegally.

Supporters said the law was needed because the U.S. federal government had failed to secure the porous southwest border with Mexico. President Barack Obama's administration challenged it in court, saying the U.S. Constitution gives the federal government sole authority over immigration policy. Arpaio, who has become the public face of local efforts to enforce tough immigration laws, denies the allegations and is to fight them in the U.S. District Court in Phoenix.

Lisa Allen, a spokeswoman for Arpaio's office, said that neither it nor its attorneys would comment "until after the case is decided."

LITTLE IMPACT ON ARPAIO

The lawsuit's plaintiffs include four other Hispanics stopped by deputies and the Somos America immigrants' rights coalition. It was later expanded to include all Latino drivers stopped by the office since 2007. Arpaio, who turned 80 last month, faces a separate, broader lawsuit lodged by the U.S. Justice Department in May, alleging systematic profiling, sloppy and indifferent police work, and a disregard for minority rights by him and county officials.

That suit contends Arpaio's office routinely violates the First Amendment rights to free speech of political opponents by retaliating against them with unsubstantiated complaints and lawsuits and by having them unlawfully arrested. But despite mounting legal problems, any win by the plaintiffs in the Melendres suit is unlikely to harm Arpaio's chances as he seeks re-election to a sixth term in November, analysts said. "More than anything else, the conflict with the (Justice Department) and this civil suit are seen by his supporters as evidence he is endeavoring to combat illegal immigration and as a result is being persecuted by the Obama Administration and liberals," said Mark P. Jones, a political scientist at Rice University in Texas.

"At this point I do not see these suits as adversely affecting his re-election efforts," Jones added.

But attorneys for the plaintiffs hope a win would bring about broad changes in the way the sheriff's office conducts its policing in Maricopa County, where nearly a third of the 3.9 million residents are Latino. Attorney Andrew C. Byrnes said the plaintiffs are not seeking monetary damages, only injunctive relief to put a stop to what he said was "racial profiling" by Arpaio's deputies. Victory would lead to the implementation of "generally accepted police practices" to avoid racial profiling, including "training, monitoring and supervision" of deputies, and the collection of data detailing the ethnic group of those stopped.

Judge Murray Snow is hearing the case. It is not clear when he will return a verdict.

http://news.yahoo.com/arizona-sherif...120238201.html

comments

Mexico, NOT the US ... The General Law on Population says,

- “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)

- Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

- Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)

...

During a recent newscast, reporter Morgan Loew revealed that Correction Corporation of America gets $11 million a month for inmates in the company's Arizona facilities. follow the money go to ALECexposed, see how CCA wrote the immigration laws in all these states, why? 11 million a month just from arizona. see what politicians are getting their pockets stuffed from corporations like this one. look at the laws passed in your state, written by corporations, that benefit them at your expence........ALECexposed

..

There's a lot of people in the U.S. who no longer go to Mexico because of the violence and problems. So here's a thought, if you're Mexican and don't like the way Mexicans are treated here.....stay in Mexico... address the problems in your own home.

...

And in old Chicago the mayor, Obamas ex chief of staff, proudly refuses to carry out the immigration laws and boldly brags of helping illegals with tax dollars. Wheres the Justice department? Only goes after Obamas targets. SOME JUSTICE!!!

..

Although Mexican authorities have harshly criticized Arizona's SB1070, a law that requires local police to check the status of persons suspected of being illegal immigrants, in Mexico, illegal immigrants receive terrible treatment from corrupt Mexican authorities.

And Mexico has a law that is no different from Arizona's that empowers local police to check the immigration documents of people suspected of not being in the country legally.

"There (in the United States), they'll deport you," Hector Vázquez, an illegal immigrant from Honduras, said as he rested in a makeshift camp with other migrants under a highway bridge in Tultitlán. "In Mexico they'll probably let you go, but they'll beat you up and steal everything you've got first."

..

I haven't noticed many white illegals crossing from mexico so profiling is the only way to go and should be continued. They can't try Joe by a jury of his equals because he has none. He's a one man army fighting the governments failure to protect its citizens.

If 95% of illegal immigrants in this country are from South and Central America and Mexico .... and 90% of those are crossing our borders in AZ and TX ... is it "profiling" or "Statitical Analysis" ?

...

what is the real reason they want the sheriff to leave illegals alone ??

I love it when illegal Mexicans are pulled over and cry racial profiling when they look white, have blonde hair etc. It has nothing to do with them being illegal, no license, no insurance etc. Profiling? Not!

Me

11:21 am ET July 24, 2012
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Set to Testify in Discrimination Case Against Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the self-proclaimed “toughest sheriff in America,” is known for his tough stance on illegal immigration. Today, Arpaio is set to testify in a class action racial discrimination lawsuit against the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department.

The suit, which was filed by the ACLU and the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, claims that Arpaio and his deputies racially profiled Latinos in an attempt to root out illegal immigrants. It does not seek money, but wants Arpaio to agree to an outside monitor and admit that he engaged in a pattern of discrimination.

The suit alleges “that he assigned multiple deputies to these Latino neighborhoods, based not on actual crime stats, but racially-motivated citizen complaints in these areas.”

La Jeunesse commented, “For many, they believe that probably over his lengthy career, he’s probably said some things that could damage his case.”

La Jeunesse concluded, “People in Arizona they love or hate this guy. But definitely, the financial stakes for the county are very high.”

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/07/24...fs-department/

comments

You have my support Sheriff Joe Arpaio. It is surprising Eric Holder is pressing allegations against Sheriff Joe, yet Holder has violated more Federal laws and is a party to murder case(s) involving killing of Mexicans and an American Citizen! Related to all of this, President Obama has violated his Oath of Office and the Constitution many times, therefore should held accountable and charge with Malfeasance.

..

I stand with Sheriff Joe 100%. We have up to 20 million illegal aliens overrunning our border and the ACLU along with President Obama is trying to stop the one man that is trying to do something about it. There is something really wrong going on in this country. We can't do anything about the ACLU but we can get rid of President Obama and that would automatically solve a lot of problems.

..

Ya gotta love Sheriff Joe! He was elected to do a job, and it looks like he's doing it. Now if only the whiners can find a bleeding heart judge, they can cost the people of Arizona millions. After all who does he think he is...a law enforcement officer...The nerve...

..

The problem I am having with President Obama is that he spends millions of dollars of taxpayer money in advertising to encourage Americans to get on Entitlement programs. He then uses Executive Orders to circumvent the U.S. Constitution to keep illegal aliens in the country and encourages others to come into the country illegally to take the jobs that Americans on welfare and unemployment don't want. It borders on treason that President Obama's intent was to knowingly circumvent Congress and the U.S. Constitution as earlier in the year he made a statement that he knew it was unlawful.

I can't pick and choose which laws I will obey. Why does Obama pick and choose which ones he will enforce?