Big Big Forums - Coupons, Freebies, Deals & Discounts
Home Sign Up Freebies Contests Reward Programs Marketplace iTrader BBF Live
Go Back   Big Big Forums - Coupons, Freebies, Deals & Discounts > General Discussions > News and Information


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2007, 01:06 AM   #45 (permalink)
Jolie Rouge
C & P Queen
 
Jolie Rouge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lan astaslem !
Posts: 37,953
iTrader: (2)
Thanks: 1,419
Thanked 3,479 Times in 1,914 Posts
Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
You can find a story on the event here..

http://media.www.thecampuspress.com/...-3007730.shtml

The Campus Press article says almost everything we need to know. The story on the other link(tryworks.org)is very funny and makes Churchill, his crew, and his 'class' come off like something Al Sharpton would cook up.

From the Campus Press:
Quote:
'Churchill plans to teach the class his own way, which, he says, doesn't always include the truth.

"Truth is something you aspire to," said Churchill. "It's not something that can be simply taught."'
If Ward had said this two years ago we could have saved our time and money investigating him.

See also : "Two men who identified themselves as event organizers turned away three male CU students at the door, calling them 'agitators'" and to find out what really "prompted a report to police" check this out:

http://tryworks.org/blog/2007/10/03/...flat-out-liar/
__________________
Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?
Jolie Rouge is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-03-2009, 12:50 AM   #46 (permalink)
Jolie Rouge
C & P Queen
 
Jolie Rouge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Lan astaslem !
Posts: 37,953
iTrader: (2)
Thanks: 1,419
Thanked 3,479 Times in 1,914 Posts
Jolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond reputeJolie Rouge has a reputation beyond repute
In Denver, the verdict in the Ward Churchill trial was just read.

The jury found that University of Colorado terminated him based on his speech, but awarded him $0 for past economic harm and $1 for current damages.

Caplis and Silverman, lawyers who have followed the case closely and host a top talk show on 630KHOW, say it should be seen as victory for CU. Interpretation: Jury found him to be an academic fraud undeserving of restitution.

Denver blog Slapstick Politics has liveblogging. http://slapstickpolitics.blogspot.co...churchill.html

More coverage at Complete Colorado. http://completecolorado.com/

And from fraud-busting blog Pirate Ballerina, a definitive analysis blasting CU’s botched defense: http://www.pirateballerina.com/blog/entry.php?id=920

Quote:
Since we’ve made no effort to hide our contempt for CU attorney Patrick O’Rourke’s mishandling of his defense of CU, it should come as no surprise to our readers that we now lay CU’s defeat directly at O’Rourke’s clown shoes. Churchill did not win this case; O’Rourke lost it. And since all problems can be traced back to management, CU is the

CU’s Achilles’ heel has always been its own sloth and incompetence, in the hiring process, the investigatory process, and finally, in the legal defense process. CU administrators were aware that Churchill’s scholarship qualifications consisted of a few mostly co-authored screeds on the usual leftist memes, and a masters degree in a bonehead major from an experimental college, yet they hired him as an Ethnic Studies professor with tenure. And CU administrators were made aware of serious problems with Churchill’s version(s) of history long before the “Little Eichmanns” essay re-emerged from obscurity back in January 2005, yet they did nothing.

It took the public outrage surrounding that essay to finally goad CU into action, putting into motion a process that lasted four years. Churchill had every opportunity to present his case, and in every instance he failed. His termination back in 2007 was the result, as was his inevitable suit against CU, the conclusion of which we have before us today.

Once the initial public outrage faded, unfortunately, CU returned, to its happy place: sloth and incompetence. During the trial, David Lane used CU’s own witnesses to illustrate those qualities, and CU’s attorney, Patrick O’Rourke was unable to counter Lane’s sallies simply because O’Rourke exemplifies CU’s commitment to sloth and incompetence. Perhaps he is a shark feared by medical litigants worldwide, but in a civil rights case with a very obvious villain (and admittedly a less-than-sympathetic good guy), O’Rourke was hopelessly outmatched.

And so, of course, Churchill won. It is a sad commentary that CU was unable to defeat a documented plagiarist and historical fraud, but we consider it the inevitable result of decades of sloth and incompetence. As others have noted with elegant simplicity, CU deserves Churchill. The question Colorado voters (and CU alumni) must now ask themselves is equally simple: Does CU deserve their support?
Did I skim this correctly?

The jury confirmed that CU damaged him, but determined that he’s only worth $1?

That’s the best possible outcome.


The verdict is right in a sense. You want don’t universities to be able to fire based purely on political/historical opinion. Even if it should apply to somebody as batcrap crazy as Ward, you don’t want to allow a precedent that could be later twisted to endanger the few remaining conservative professors out there.

He should be paid his $1 in counterfeit money, to symbolize the fraud that he is. But here’s the kicker: the jury gave him a buck, but what you don’t read is that the school will, in all likelihood, have to cough up hundreds of thousands for his attorney fees. Sometimes juries don’t realize that a tiny win for a plaintiff is a huge windfall for his or her attorney, and oftentimes plaintiffs have a back-door deal with their attorney to split those fees 50/50. Churchill will get six figures out of this, mark my words.
Damn fraud.
__________________
Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?
Jolie Rouge is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
© 2007, BigBigForums Inc.