Page 9 of 9 First ... 56789
  1. #89
    3lilpigs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Somewhere between here and there.
    Posts
    7,176
    Thanks
    1,746
    Thanked 2,686 Times in 1,106 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge View Post
    Missouri Cops Made Alarming Find Buried By Where Muslims Bought Cellphones

    Posted on December 13, 2015 by Amanda Shea

    The mystery into the Missouri Muslims buying up hundreds of cellphones from several Walmart stores, just took a concerning turn for the worst, because of what was discovered buried near where the purchases were made. One alert man noticed something strange about the ground and called police to the scene, but nobody was prepared for what was found right under foot.

    Since the suspicious activity first leaked last week, the investigation has progressively revealed worse details, working retroactively to bring to light every alarming thing that happened before two men were stopped in a Lebanon Walmart.

    A man who was hunting in the Mark Twain National Forest, just 30 minutes from Lebanon, was about to set up camp in a spot he uses each season, when he noticed something about the ground that didn’t seem right. After poking around at the ground a bit, he got concerned about what he found and urgently called police. The Pulaski County Sheriff’s Department came running, bringing along with them a massive team of expert personnel they called in for assistance. http://madworldnews.com/muslim-refugees-bought-walmart/

    Officers found a huge cache of “extremely volatile” explosives, which police described to be of a style “that could not be purchased for recreational use.” This suggests that the extensive supply was all homemade pipe bombs or other IEDs, created and collected with a specific plan in mind. The stock was so dangerous that it couldn’t be safely detonated without the help of the Explosive Ordinance Disposal Unit (EOD), the Missouri State Highway Patrol’s EOD Unit, and the Waynesville Rural Fire Department, KY3 reported. The exact location, as well as recent developments, make this discovery even more concerning than what law enforcement knew at the time.

    Where the bombs were found was not only by the Walmart stores where all the throwaway phones were purchased by Muslim men, who still remain at large, but also the next closest wooded area to where a man was spotted by a trail camera and witness while acting strangely. After the explosive stash was found and destroyed, perhaps those who put it there are trying to restock it now and have found a new hiding place for it in the wooded area of Madison County, where the man was seen dressed in black, acting weird in the woods.

    Terrorists would want to hide their stock like this to not get caught with it in their cars or homes, foiling their plans, especially with a stash of hundreds of untraceable cellphones. Also, these locations they’re picking could be central for all those who are part of the plan to carry out an attack that could be underway. Both aforementioned wooded areas are within close proximity to St. Louis, which might be the intended target.

    With so many suspicious instances in one small area, it can’t be a coincidence. Especially since each piece fits together in a puzzle that looks a lot like terrorism on American soil.

    http://madworldnews.com/missouri-woo...im-cellphones/

    Any updates on this story??
    It seems to have faded away

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #90
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,388
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Police in a U.S. town bordering Mexico have apprehended an undocumented, Middle Eastern woman in possession of the region’s gas pipeline plans, law enforcement sources tell Judicial Watch. Authorities describe the woman as an “Islamic refugee” pulled over during a traffic stop by a deputy sheriff in Luna County, New Mexico which shares a 54-mile border with Mexico.

    County authorities alerted the U.S. Border Patrol and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF) has been deployed to the area to investigate, sources with firsthand knowledge of the probe confirm.


    Last edited by Jolie Rouge; 06-19-2016 at 06:41 PM.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jolie Rouge For This Useful Post:

    boopster (06-19-2016)

  5. #91

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,434
    Thanks
    848
    Thanked 451 Times in 312 Posts
    not surprising. the enemies of the united states have been saying it and little by little some ppl are finally getting the message loud and clear...but not all of them

  6. #92
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,388
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Feds Strong-arm the State of Texas into Taking Syrian Refugees

    Top CIA and FBI officials recently admitted that the Islamic State is using these refugee flows for infiltration, and that we lack the basic information we'd need. Why the heavy-handed push?


    BY Bruce Cornibe · | June 18, 2016



    The debate about Syrian refugees causes heated passions on both sides of the political aisle. However, when addressing the issue, it’s important to note that the big question is U.S. national security. Refugees brought here cost ten times as much as refugees settled closer to their homes. We can only help one tenth as many refugees if we do it by bringing them here. The only argument to bring them here, then, is if there is no national security risk and they offer some significant benefit to the United States.

    Unfortunately, the State of Texas found out recently that no matter what they say about the subject it doesn’t matter in the end. Texas ended up losing a long battle about the resettlement of Syrian refugees in their state. The background of the Texas case follows:

    In the aftermath of terrorist attacks in Paris that left 130 dead, Texas’ Republican leaders raised concerns about the refugee vetting process. Abbott in November directed resettlement nonprofits in Texas to halt the resettlement of any Syrian refugees last month.

    But the federal government warned Texas it did not have the power to reject Syrian refugees, and the International Rescue Committee’s Dallas branch informed the state it would continue aiding Syrian refugees placed in Texas.

    (Refugee resettlement in the United States is completely funded by the federal government, but the state is in charge of contracting with local nonprofit organizations and distributing federal dollars to those agencies.)

    This case not only reminds us about the federal government’s power in refugee resettlement in America, but more importantly, the potential threat of terrorism. A report this year shows dozens more people, many of whom are listed as immigrants, “have been implicated in terrorist plots in the United States since 2014, bringing the total number of terrorists discovered since that time to 113.” FBI Director James Comey has even warned about the lack of information for properly vetting Syrian refugees, saying, “We can query our databases until the cows come home, but nothing will show up because we have no record of that person…You can only query what you have collected.” Just the other day, CIA Director John Brennan advised Senate lawmakers about ISIS exploiting, “refugee streams, traditional smuggling routes and legitimate travel” in order to transfer fighters.


    The Center for Security Policy sums up how Islamists use the immigration of Muslim refugees for their political agenda, stating:


    Hijra [migration] remains the model to this day for jihadists who seek to populate and dominate new lands. Their migrations are not for the purpose of assimilating peacefully in a new host nation, adopting as their own its traditions and legal systems. Rather, Mohammed’s followers, in keeping with the example established by their prophet, are driven first to colonize and then to transform non-Muslim target societies – whether through violent means or via stealthy, pre-violent ones favored by the Muslim Brotherhood when it is not powerful enough to use violence decisively [civilization jihad].
    Since we know that the resettlement of Syrian refugees poses a grave threat to U.S. national security, why do states like Texas get demonized for trying to block such misguided policies? It’s time to take the political correctness out of U.S. immigration policy, and get serious about protecting this country.

    http://counterjihad.com/feds-strong-...yrian-refugees
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  7. #93
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,388
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Feds Strong-arm the State of Texas into Taking Syrian Refugees

    Top CIA and FBI officials recently admitted that the Islamic State is using these refugee flows for infiltration, and that we lack the basic information we'd need. Why the heavy-handed push?


    BY Bruce Cornibe · | June 18, 2016



    The debate about Syrian refugees causes heated passions on both sides of the political aisle. However, when addressing the issue, it’s important to note that the big question is U.S. national security. Refugees brought here cost ten times as much as refugees settled closer to their homes. We can only help one tenth as many refugees if we do it by bringing them here. The only argument to bring them here, then, is if there is no national security risk and they offer some significant benefit to the United States.

    Unfortunately, the State of Texas found out recently that no matter what they say about the subject it doesn’t matter in the end. Texas ended up losing a long battle about the resettlement of Syrian refugees in their state. The background of the Texas case follows:

    In the aftermath of terrorist attacks in Paris that left 130 dead, Texas’ Republican leaders raised concerns about the refugee vetting process. Abbott in November directed resettlement nonprofits in Texas to halt the resettlement of any Syrian refugees last month.

    But the federal government warned Texas it did not have the power to reject Syrian refugees, and the International Rescue Committee’s Dallas branch informed the state it would continue aiding Syrian refugees placed in Texas.

    (Refugee resettlement in the United States is completely funded by the federal government, but the state is in charge of contracting with local nonprofit organizations and distributing federal dollars to those agencies.)

    This case not only reminds us about the federal government’s power in refugee resettlement in America, but more importantly, the potential threat of terrorism. A report this year shows dozens more people, many of whom are listed as immigrants, “have been implicated in terrorist plots in the United States since 2014, bringing the total number of terrorists discovered since that time to 113.” FBI Director James Comey has even warned about the lack of information for properly vetting Syrian refugees, saying, “We can query our databases until the cows come home, but nothing will show up because we have no record of that person…You can only query what you have collected.” Just the other day, CIA Director John Brennan advised Senate lawmakers about ISIS exploiting, “refugee streams, traditional smuggling routes and legitimate travel” in order to transfer fighters.


    The Center for Security Policy sums up how Islamists use the immigration of Muslim refugees for their political agenda, stating:


    Hijra [migration] remains the model to this day for jihadists who seek to populate and dominate new lands. Their migrations are not for the purpose of assimilating peacefully in a new host nation, adopting as their own its traditions and legal systems. Rather, Mohammed’s followers, in keeping with the example established by their prophet, are driven first to colonize and then to transform non-Muslim target societies – whether through violent means or via stealthy, pre-violent ones favored by the Muslim Brotherhood when it is not powerful enough to use violence decisively [civilization jihad].
    Since we know that the resettlement of Syrian refugees poses a grave threat to U.S. national security, why do states like Texas get demonized for trying to block such misguided policies? It’s time to take the political correctness out of U.S. immigration policy, and get serious about protecting this country.

    http://counterjihad.com/feds-strong-...yrian-refugees
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  8. #94

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,434
    Thanks
    848
    Thanked 451 Times in 312 Posts
    perhaps texas should put them all on a tourist bus to see the white house.....

    on a moore serious note :
    http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/03/pau...o-happen-here/

    https://player.vimeo.com/video/167607521

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to boopster For This Useful Post:

    Jolie Rouge (06-20-2016)

  10. #95
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,388
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Whistleblower Reveals Obama Ordered DHS to Delete Records of Islamic Terrorists
    June 19, 2016

    Philip Haney, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) whistleblower exposes a shocking revelation. President Obama ordered him to scrub the DHS database of all records of Muslims with terror ties.



    http://truthfeed.com/bombshell-video...rrorists/8069/

    Prediction : Philip Haney killed in a tragic single car accident or mugging 'gone bad' by the end of the week "
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Jolie Rouge For This Useful Post:

    boopster (08-08-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in