Page 2 of 36 First 12345622 ... Last
  1. #12
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Will Media Remember Hillary Clinton Touting Syrian Ruler As a 'Reformer' http://goo.gl/tT5n01

    Yes you read that right - Hillary touted Syria's ruler, the man responsible for a chemical attack on his OWN people, a 'reformer.'

    Thumbs up if you think the media will SKIP right over this story

    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement Hillary in 2016 ?
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #13
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Hillary Clinton played a KEY ROLE in the Team Obama's politically motivated cover-up of the Benghazi terrorist attacks that resulted in the DEATHS of four Americans.

    Meanwhile, on the ANNIVERSARY of Benghazi, NBC fawns over Hillary for receiving an award. http://goo.gl/iNtKN9

    Well done NBC, you've just set a new bar for DISGRACEFUL journalism.

    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  4. #14
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Hillary Clinton is circling the wagons and salivating over a presidential run in 2016:
    Hillary accrued power and her life-long dream of being POTUS is nearing.

    But not so fast Hillary. Take a look at the bodies mysteriously left in Clinton’s wake!

    #1 – James McDougal : Convicted Whitewater partner of the Clintons who died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

    TO VIEW THE ENTIRE LIST, GO TO THIS LINK:

    http://theblacksphere.net/2013/10/47...ZvT1Cf7JRkB.99
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  5. #15
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Hillary Clinton Heckled During College Speech: 'Benghazi, Benghazi, You Let Them Die!'
    By Noel Sheppard | October 23, 2013

    As NewsBusters reported, the media were practically orgasmic last week when Hillary Clinton stepped into politics endorsing Terry McAuliffe for governor of Virginia. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...n-shes-got-run

    Will they give similar coverage to a speech Clinton gave at the University of Buffalo Wednesday which was interrupted by a man in the audience screaming, "Benghazi, Benghazi, you let them die!" (videos follow with commentary):

    The first video was taken by University cameras and of course focused on Clinton without moving toward the heckler. ( go to link )

    However, this second video, though low quality, was taken by someone present in the auditorium giving better audio of the heckler's comments.



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=sKWbxT7iO94

    As our friends at Twitchy reported, numerous people tweeted what occurred claiming that the heckler was removed. http://twitchy.com/2013/10/23/you-le...ng-speech-pic/

    This led Clinton to say, "We have to be willing to come together as citizens to focus on the kind of future we want, which doesn't include yelling. It includes sitting down and talking with one another."

    This was met with loud applause from the audience, and likely would from the media as well if the word "Benghazi" wasn't uttered.

    Or will so-called "journalists" reference Clinton being heckled and handling it well without mentioning the man said "Benghazi" which they like President Obama consider to be a phony scandal?

    If this gets covered at all, that's my bet.

    *****Update: Readers have probably noticed the second video no longer works. Here's a better one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9I41O...layer_embedded



    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz2ijZepJ25
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  6. #16
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Hillary Clinton Fired For Lies, Unethical Behavior
    Posted on 14 June, 2013 by Dylan Dan Calabrese


    Bet you didn’t know this.

    I’ve decided to reprint a piece of work I did nearly five years ago, because it seems very relevant today given Hillary Clinton’s performance in the Benghazi hearings. Back in 2008 when she was running for president, I interviewed two erstwhile staff members of the House Judiciary Committee who were involved with the Watergate investigation when Hillary was a low-level staffer there. I interviewed one Democrat staffer and one Republican staffer, and wrote two pieces based on what they told me about Hillary’s conduct at the time.

    I published these pieces back in 2008 for North Star Writers Group, the syndicate I ran at the time. This was the most widely read piece we ever had at NSWG, but because NSWG never gained the high-profile status of the major syndicates, this piece still didn’t reach as many people as I thought it deserved to. Today, given the much broader reach of CainTV and yet another incidence of Hillary’s arrogance in dealing with a congressional committee, I think it deserves another airing. For the purposes of simplicity, I’ve combined the two pieces into one very long one. If you’re interested in understanding the true character of Hillary Clinton, it’s worth your time to read it.

    As Hillary Clinton came under increasing scrutiny for her story about facing sniper fire in Bosnia, one question that arose was whether she has engaged in a pattern of lying.

    The now-retired general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary when she worked on the Watergate investigation, says Hillary’s history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

    Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.

    Why?

    “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”

    House Committee 1974 Hillary Clinton fired for lies, unethical behavior

    How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.

    Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.

    The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of top Democrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception.

    The brief involved precedent for representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding. When Hillary endeavored to write a legal brief arguing there is no right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding, Zeifman says, he told Hillary about the case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who faced an impeachment attempt in 1970.

    “As soon as the impeachment resolutions were introduced by (then-House Minority Leader Gerald) Ford, and they were referred to the House Judiciary Committee, the first thing Douglas did was hire himself a lawyer,” Zeifman said.

    The Judiciary Committee allowed Douglas to keep counsel, thus establishing the precedent. Zeifman says he told Hillary that all the documents establishing this fact were in the Judiciary Committee’s public files. So what did Hillary do?

    “Hillary then removed all the Douglas files to the offices where she was located, which at that time was secured and inaccessible to the public,” Zeifman said. Hillary then proceeded to write a legal brief arguing there was no precedent for the right to representation by counsel during an impeachment proceeding – as if the Douglas case had never occurred.

    The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.

    Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.

    Of course, Nixon’s resignation rendered the entire issue moot, ending Hillary’s career on the Judiciary Committee staff in a most undistinguished manner. Zeifman says he was urged by top committee members to keep a diary of everything that was happening. He did so, and still has the diary if anyone wants to check the veracity of his story. Certainly, he could not have known in 1974 that diary entries about a young lawyer named Hillary Rodham would be of interest to anyone 34 years later.

    But they show that the pattern of lies, deceit, fabrications and unethical behavior was established long ago – long before the Bosnia lie, and indeed, even before cattle futures, Travelgate and Whitewater – for the woman who is still asking us to make her president of the United States.

    Franklin Polk, who served at the time as chief Republican counsel on the committee, confirmed many of these details in two interviews he granted me this past Friday, although his analysis of events is not always identical to Zeifman’s. Polk specifically confirmed that Hillary wrote the memo in question, and confirmed that Hillary ignored the Douglas case. (He said he couldn’t confirm or dispel the part about Hillary taking the Douglas files.)

    To Polk, Hillary’s memo was dishonest in the sense that she tried to pretend the Douglas precedent didn’t exist. But unlike Zeifman, Polk considered the memo dishonest in a way that was more stupid than sinister.

    “Hillary should have mentioned that (the Douglas case), and then tried to argue whether that was a change of policy or not instead of just ignoring it and taking the precedent out of the opinion,” Polk said.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  7. #17
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Polk recalled that the attempt to deny counsel to Nixon upset a great many members of the committee, including just about all the Republicans, but many Democrats as well.

    “The argument sort of broke like a firestorm on the committee, and I remember Congressman Don Edwards was very upset,” Polk said. “He was the chairman of the subcommittee on constitutional rights. But in truth, the impeachment precedents are not clear. Let’s put it this way. In the old days, from the beginning of the country through the 1800s and early 1900s, there were precedents that the target or accused did not have the right to counsel.”

    That’s why Polk believes Hillary’s approach in writing the memorandum was foolish. He says she could have argued that the Douglas case was an isolated example, and that other historical precedents could apply.

    But Zeifman says the memo and removal of the Douglas files was only part the effort by Hillary, Doar, Nussbaum and Marshall to pursue their own agenda during the investigation.

    After my first column, some readers wrote in claiming Zeifman was motivated by jealousy because he was not appointed as the chief counsel in the investigation, with that title going to Doar instead.

    Zeifman’s account is that he supported the appointment of Doar because he, Zeifman, a) did not want the public notoriety that would come with such a high-profile role; and b) didn’t have much prosecutorial experience. When he started to have a problem with Doar and his allies was when Zeifman and others, including House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill and Democratic committee member Jack Brooks of Texas, began to perceive Doar’s group as acting outside the directives and knowledge of the committee and its chairman, Peter Rodino.

    (O’Neill died in 1994. Brooks is still living and I tried unsuccessfully to reach him. I’d still like to.)

    This culminated in a project to research past presidential abuses of power, which committee members felt was crucial in aiding the decisions they would make in deciding how to handle Nixon’s alleged offenses.

    According to Zeifman and other documents, Doar directed Hillary to work with a group of Yale law professors on this project. But the report they generated was never given to the committee. Zeifman believes the reason was that the report was little more than a whitewash of the Kennedy years – a part of the Burke Marshall-led agenda of avoiding revelations during the Watergate investigation that would have embarrassed the Kennedys.

    The fact that the report was kept under wraps upset Republican committee member Charles Wiggins of California, who wrote a memo to his colleagues on the committee that read in part:

    Within the past few days, some disturbing information has come to my attention. It is requested that the facts concerning the matter be investigated and a report be made to the full committee as it concerns us all.

    Early last spring when it became obvious that the committee was considering presidential “abuse of power” as a possible ground of impeachment, I raised the question before the full committee that research should be undertaken so as to furnish a standard against which to test the alleged abusive conduct of Richard Nixon.

    As I recall, several other members joined with me in this request. I recall as well repeating this request from time to time during the course of our investigation. The staff, as I recall, was noncommittal, but it is certain that no such staff study was made available to the members at any time for their use.

    Wiggins believed the report was purposely hidden from committee members. Chairman Rodino denied this, and said the reason Hillary’s report was not given to committee members was that it contained no value. It’s worth noting, of course, that the staff member who made this judgment was John Doar.



    In a four-page reply to Wiggins, Rodino wrote in part:

    Hillary Rodham of the impeachment inquiry staff coordinated the work. . . . After the staff received the report it was reviewed by Ms. Rodham, briefly by Mr. Labovitz and Mr. Sack, and by Doar. The staff did not think the manuscript was useful in its present form. . . .

    In your letter you suggest that members of the staff may have intentionally suppressed the report during the course of its investigation. That was not the case.

    As a matter of fact, Mr. Doar was more concerned that any highlight of the project might prejudice the case against President Nixon. The fact is that the staff did not think the material was usable by the committee in its existing form and had not had time to modify it so it would have practical utility for the members of the committee. I was informed and agreed with the judgment.

    Mr. Labovitz, by the way, was John Labovitz, another member of the Democratic staff. I spoke with Labovitz this past Friday as well, and he is no fan of Jerry Zeifman.

    “If it’s according to Zeifman, it’s inaccurate from my perspective,” Labovitz said. He bases that statement on a recollection that Zeifman did not actually work on the impeachment inquiry staff, although that is contradicted not only by Zeifman but Polk as well.

    Labovitz said he has no knowledge of Hillary having taken any files, and defended her no-right-to-counsel memo on the grounds that, if she was assigned to write a memo arguing a point of view, she was merely following orders.

    But as both Zeifman and Polk point out, that doesn’t mean ignoring background of which you are aware, or worse, as Zeifman alleges, confiscating documents that disprove your argument.

    All told, Polk recalls the actions of Hillary, Doar and Nussbaum as more amateurish than anything else.

    “Of course the Republicans went nuts,” Polk said. “But so did some of the Democrats – some of the most liberal Democrats. It was more like these guys – Doar and company – were trying to manage the members of Congress, and it was like, ‘Who’s in charge here?’ If you want to convict a president, you want to give him all the rights possible. If you’re going to give him a trial, for him to say, ‘My rights were denied,’ – it was a stupid effort by people who were just politically tone deaf. So this was a big deal to people in the proceedings on the committee, no question about it. And Jerry Zeifman went nuts, and rightfully so. But my reaction wasn’t so much that it was underhanded as it was just stupid.”

    Polk recalls Zeifman sharing with him at the time that he believed Hillary’s primary role was to report back to Burke Marshall any time the investigation was taking a turn that was not to the liking of the Kennedys.

    “Jerry used to give the chapter and verse as to how Hillary was the mole into the committee works as to how things were going,” Polk said. “And she’d be feeding information back to Burke Marshall, who, at least according to Jerry, was talking to the Kennedys. And when something was off track in the view of the Kennedys, Burke Marshall would call John Doar or something, and there would be a reconsideration of what they were talking about. Jerry used to tell me that this was Hillary’s primary function.”

    Zeifman says he had another staff member get him Hillary’s phone records, which showed that she was calling Burke Marshall at least once a day, and often several times a day.

    A final note about all this: I wrote my first column on this subject because, in the aftermath of Hillary being caught in her Bosnia fib, I came in contact with Jerry Zeifman and found his story compelling. Zeifman has been trying to tell his story for many years, and the mainstream media have ignored him. I thought it deserved an airing as a demonstration of how early in her career Hillary began engaging in self-serving, disingenuous conduct.

    Disingenuously arguing a position? Vanishing documents? Selling out members of her own party to advance a personal agenda? Classic Hillary. Neither my first column on the subject nor this one were designed to show that Hillary is dishonest. I don’t really think that’s in dispute. Rather, they were designed to show that she has been this way for a very long time – a fact worth considering for anyone contemplating voting for her for president of the United States.

    By the way, there’s something else that started a long time ago.

    “She would go around saying, ‘I’m dating a person who will some day be president,’” Polk said. “It was like a Babe Ruth call. And because of that comment she made, I watched Bill Clinton’s political efforts as governor of Arkansas, and I never counted him out because she had made that forecast.”

    Bill knew what he wanted a long time ago. Clearly, so did Hillary, and her tactics for trying to achieve it were established even in those early days.

    Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/hil...ical-behavior/
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  8. #18
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Just a quick refresher course lest we forget what has happened to many "friends" of the Clintons
    Anyone else in this country surrounded by so many suicides, suspicious deaths and obvious murders would have been tried for more then 50 counts of Conspiracy to Commit Murder - since I'm sure neither Bill nor Hillary every did anything themselves.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HYStaILsUw

    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  9. #19

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,434
    Thanks
    848
    Thanked 451 Times in 312 Posts
    tonight i heard that the NYT is saying that the video is the cause of benghazi! this all despite the other evidence that has been accumulated thru various investigations that does NOT point to a video. now...bill clinton is going to officiate at the swearing in of the new NYC mayor....bill c works out of NYC.......nyt is pro democrat.....and who would be shocked if/when they endorse hillary who after saying that ambassador stevens was her friend declared about the murdered americans "what difference does it make"

    americans should tread carefully........................

  10. #20
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    Hillary's List of Lies By Dick Morris

    Hillary simply cannot tell the truth. Here's her scorecard:


    Admitted Lies

    • Chelsea was jogging around the Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.
    (She was in bed watching it on TV.)

    • Hillary was named after Sir Edmund Hillary.
    (She admitted she was wrong. He climbed Mt. Everest five years after her birth.)

    • She was under sniper fire in Bosnia.
    (A young girl presented her with flowers at the foot of the ramp.)

    • She learned in The Wall Street Journal how to make a killing in the futures market.
    (It didn't cover the market back then.)

    Whoppers She Won't Confess To

    • She didn't know about the FALN pardons.

    • She didn't know that her brothers were being paid to get pardons that Clinton granted.

    • Taking the White House gifts was a clerical error.

    • She didn't know that her staff would fire the travel office staff after she told them to do so.

    • She didn't know that the Peter Paul fundraiser in Hollywood in 2000 cost $700,000 more than she reported it had.

    • She opposed NAFTA at the time.

    • She was instrumental in the Irish peace process.

    • She urged Bill to intervene in Rwanda.

    • She played a role in the '90s economic recovery.

    • The billing records showed up on their own.

    • She thought Bill was innocent when the Monica scandal broke.

    • She was always a Yankees fan.

    • She had nothing to do with the New Square Hasidic pardons (after they voted for her 1,400-12 and she attended a meeting at the White House about the pardons).

    • She negotiated for the release of refugees in Macedonia (who were released the day before she got there).

    With a record like that, is it any wonder that we suspect her of being less than honest and straightforward?

    *Admin notes: And the most current BIG LIE of all:

    A YOUTUBE Video caused the massacre at Benghazi.

    Then there's the FAKE HOSPITALIZATION when the HEAT WAS ON for Benghazi!

    Dick Morris (né Richard S. Morris; born 28 November 1948) is an American political author and commentator who previously worked as a pollster, political campaign consultant, and general political consultant.

    A friend and advisor to Bill Clinton during his time as Governor of Arkansas, Morris became a political adviser to the White House after Clinton was elected president in 1992. Morris encouraged Clinton to pursue third way policies of triangulation that combined traditional Republican and Democratic proposals, rhetoric, and issues so as to achieve maximum political gain and popularity. He worked as a Republican strategist before joining the Clinton administration, where he helped Clinton recover from the 1994 midterm elections by advising the President to adopt more moderate policies. The president consulted Morris in secret beginning in 1994. Clinton's communications director George Stephanopoulos has said, "Over the course of the first nine months of 1995, no single person had more power over the president."

    Morris went on to become campaign manager of Bill Clinton's successful 1996 bid for re-election to the office of President. His tenure on that campaign was cut short two months before the election, when it was revealed that he had allowed a prostitute to listen in on conversations with the President.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Morris
    Last edited by Jolie Rouge; 01-05-2014 at 12:48 PM.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  11. #21
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    63,383
    Thanks
    2,805
    Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,690 Posts
    On my FB Feed this morning :
    Reader's Digest

    "Every moment wasted looking back keeps us from moving forward."—Hilary Clinton

    about an hour ago
    Some of the comments :

    Those who choose to forget the past are doomed to repeat it. You have to acknowledge the past in order to learn from it and make the future better

    ..

    what difference does it make? *Benghazi*

    ..

    I cant believe you're quoting Hillary "what difference does it make* Clinton

    ..

    Allowing US citizens/ diplomats to be murdered is not a past we should forget. Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.

    ..

    When the sleight of hand distracts usfrom what you are doing, we have to go back to see what you have been doing...
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  12. #22

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,434
    Thanks
    848
    Thanked 451 Times in 312 Posts
    and should we all believe that "ignorance is bliss"? is this why government does not want the people to know the truth? then again it is said if you do not use it, you lose it so if people stop using what god gave them, we can all be blithering idiots and allow our "leaders" to do what they please (which they pretty much already do). I personally resent government telling me I am too dumb to think, I know nothing, I should concentrate on trying to put one foot in front of the other because I lack the capability of doing anything else. Also to have any government leader not care about their country and that country's citizens would put any country in the same predicament (not a strong enough word) as nazi germany. I do not want this country to be a repeat of german history with a leader who does not respect life and liberty, who has a master plan to exterminate those whose beliefs differ, who might be smarter, who might not want this supreme leader to dictate leaving the citizens without any control of their government or their lives.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in