Page 6 of 46 First ... 234567891026 ... Last
  1. #56
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    comments

    Has anyone actually thought the attack was in celebration of 9/11/01 for those that murdered the Americans. It was their way of saying - Yes America we still hate you. Now what are you going to do about it? They knew Obama would do nothing. They are laughing at all Americans.

    ..

    O wants the nation to vote for revenge. A vote for Romney is a vote for RESPECT. I think if Reagan were in office, 9/11 would NEVER have happened. He would have ordered "whatever it takes" to kill terrorism wherever it is.

    ..

    If this is true, then where is the control? There must be some one or some organization above them that should sanction them in some manner or put them off the air for hiding evidence. If there is no order for them to follow, then they, as Obozo's Administration, should all be brought up for hearing in front of a Congressional committee on ethics or whatever the proper committee is. This should not be allowed to go untouched as though NOTHING happened. Americans died on American soil due to the negligence of some one or a group of someones. The evidence is there and heroes for our country. The words for the excuse - we have to know what's going on before we send back-up in - are the worst words I ever heard when Americans died as they were uttered. If you cannot lead, it is time to get out. Congress, do your job, and while you are at it, add to that 'Fast and Furious".

    ..

    This is just more of team Obama's strategy, aided by their lapdogs in the media, to run out the clock and avoid answering questions before the election. Other than FOX nobody has asked any serious questions about why additional security was denied, why no support was sent during the 7 hrs of the attack, and the lies and cover up following the attack.

    ..

    "None Dare Call It Treason" because if Obama wins they will be toast! When Obama called the SEALs, they got bin Laden, but when the SEALs called Obama, they got denied, and then they died!

    Valerie Jarret, Obama’s Brain:
    “After we win this election, it’s our turn. Payback time. Everyone not with us is against us and they better be ready because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded; the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. There is going to be hell to pay. Congress won’t be a problem for us this time. No election to worry about after this is over and we have two judges ready to go.”
    ..

    It seems Obama and company thinks 'terrorists' are ANYONE who disagrees with his policies! Note, this DOESN'T include Muslims! Therefore, since Muslims attacked our Embassy, they could NOT have been 'terrorists'! Using his definition of 'terrorists', we can therefore expect a crackdown on DOMESTIC 'terrorists'!

    Remember, this is JUST those who disagree with Obama's policies! We can look forward to mass roundups of domestic 'terrorists' in the near future, now that he has apparently gotten his second term! This also gibes with Hillary and her drive to disarm the populace, in conjunction with the U.N.'s desires: NONE of them want us to offer ANY resistance to this roundup!

    And now, Obama's statement about wanting a civilian 'police' force "equal in number to our Armed Forces", & all those 'hollow point' ammo purchases make sense! Plus, all the compounds with living quarters surrounded by barbed wire, supposedly erected for 'FEMA', will be the place for our confinement! These were to be set up to accommodate people seeking refuge from natural disasters! Just so strange how much they resemble the concentration camps set up by the Nazis, conveniently so near to railroad tracks!

    The voters who allowed his majesty Obama to continue his reign were his 'convenient idiots', and will be the FIRST ones placed in those compounds! They probably will go willingly, like sheep to the shearing! Those who will NOT submit, will trigger the 'martial law' pretext, and justify all Obama's plans.

    ..

    It had been revealed recently that Obama had planned the ordeal to have been a kidnapping of the ambassador to Libya who he was then intending to trade for the Blind Sheik to both appease the Muslims and boost his polling ratings all at the same time. If what PPSimmons states is true, Obama should be tried for treason if he is not voted out today because four of our troops were sacrificed when they could have been saved. They asked for reinforcement 3 times and were turned down every time, then reinforcements who tried to go in to do that job were told by Obama to stand down. Something is very rotten in Denmark and an investigation is in order immediately if not sooner.



    So - what do you think will happen to the "investigation" now that BO is back in the Oval Office ??
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement Obama KNEW ... and lied to the American people
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #57

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    5,185
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked 852 Times in 390 Posts
    What investigation? (sic)

    Me

  4. #58
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Remember when Job questioned God, and God answered from the whirlwind?

    Who are you to question one such as me? was the gist of it.

    All of which I bring up to suggest that maybe we are all Job, and our Benghazi questions are quite rightly being met with indignation. http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/11936


    http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=45163




    http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/157264/ The Cult of Obama is sort of like those Baal worshipers. Or maybe the Aztecs. Kill a hundred people for the benefit of the movement.


    ..

    “They were defeated in Iraq and they are withdrawing from Afghanistan, and their ambassador in Benghazi was killed and the flags of their embassies were lowered in Cairo and Sana’a, and in their places were raised the flags of tawhid [monotheism] and jihad,” Zawahiri says, according to a translation provided by the SITE Intelligence Group.

    “After their consecutive defeats, they are working from behind agents and traitors,” Zawahiri continues. “Their awe is lost and their might is gone and they don’t dare to carry out a new campaign like their past ones in Iraq and Afghanistan.”

    http://www.longwarjournal.org/archiv...#ixzz2BaR7BwCM

    Does anyone seriously beleive that this administration will now pursue the "investigation" now that the election is over ?? I have some very Liberal friends on FB & RL - none of them will answer that question.[/i]
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  5. #59
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    State Department grants senators 2-day access to Benghazi documents… while they’re out of town
    By Doug Powers • November 8, 2012 10:10 PM


    This is transparency on a “two-day limited engagement” basis, and if you can’t make it, you can’t make it: http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/po...re_out_of_town

    Under pressure from senators, the State Department is allowing some lawmakers to look at cables and other documents related to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, but only today and tomorrow, when most senators are not in Washington.

    Congress is gearing up for a full week of Benghazi-related hearings next week, including a Nov. 13 hearing behind closed doors of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, led by Chairman John Kerry (D-MA). Kerry has written two letters to the State Department requesting congressional access to information and documents related to the circumstances leading up to and during the attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens. Several sensitive documents have already been leaked to congressional offices and the media, so the State Department has decided to let some senators view Benghazi documents but not take them home.
    As for John Kerry, he’s in line to replace Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, http://bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2...HaM/story.html so what are the odds of Lurch actually causing any Benghazi-related headaches for the Obama administration? I’ll put $20 on “no chance in hell.” By the time this ends Kerry will probably have tried to smooth things over so much he’ll be mistaken for a 6’4″ finishing sander.

    Here’s the witness list for the Senate hearing next Thursday:

    The witnesses will be Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, CIA Director David Petraeus, FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce,Under Secretary of State for Management Pat Kennedy,and National Counterterrorism Center Director Matthew Olsen.

    The House Intelligence Committee will hold a closed hearing on Benghazi next week — also on Thursday, and with a similar witness list. And the House Foreign Affairs Committee has an open hearing scheduled for Thursday as well. The latter committee invited Hillary Clinton to testify. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...-intelligence/

    http://michellemalkin.com/2012/11/08...nt-benghazi-3/

    The witness list is very interesting in light of what CIA Director David Petraeus has said previously ... and the fact that he resigned earlier today.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  6. #60

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,400
    Thanks
    849
    Thanked 444 Times in 312 Posts
    forget Petraeus. allegedly he admitted an extra marital affair and has resigned. hmmmmmm he wasn't allowing obama to throw him under the bus and now he has been conveniently removed......makes a person wonder

  7. #61
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Rep. Gowdy: ‘I hope we don’t have to subpeona’ Petraeus to Benghazi hearing;
    Update: Hillary asked to testify, declines due to travel schedule

    By Doug Powers • November 10, 2012 01:09 PM

    Yesterday, news of the resignation of CIA Director David Petraeus caught almost everyone by surprise, if not for the resignation itself, for the reason. The CIA reportedly said that as a result, Petraeus wouldn’t be testifying next week at the Benghazi hearings, and that CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell would testify in his place (if having an affair earns one a “get out of congressional hearing testimony free” card that might explain why the practice has proven so popular in Congress throughout our nation’s history).

    Not so fast on the CIA’s offer of a replacement witness, according to South Carolina GOP Rep. Trey Gowdy: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012...poenaed-video/

    “The fact that he’s resigned and had an affair has nothing to do with whether he will be subpoenaed to Congress. I hope we don’t have to subpoena a four star general and a former CIA director. I would hope he would come voluntarily but if he won’t he will be subpoenaed. And none of what happened today is an offense to a subpoena… He’s either a witness in our case in chief or he’s gonna be a rebuttal witness if Susan Rice and others blame him for their failure of intelligence and failure of information. But there is no way we can get to the bottom of Benghazi without David Petraeus.”

    p. Peter King echoed that and said Petraeus is an “absolutely necessary witness” at the Benghazi hearing(s): http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...y_witness.html http://cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoft...s-reaction.cnn

    Ed Morrissey at Hot Air has a possible answer as to what the FBI was doing investigating the head of the CIA. http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/1...rector-anyway/

    Other questions remain. http://ace.mu.nu/archives/334824.php

    Meanwhile, true to form, the New York Post is all over it: http://twitchy.com/2012/11/10/pics-n...abloid-battle/



    Update: Wouldn’t be surprised to see a few more stops added to Hillary’s itinerary for the rest of the year on top of those already scheduled: http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...use-commmittee

    The Republican-led House Foreign Affairs Committee asked Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to testify at an open hearing next week about the Sept. 11 attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

    While the State Department responded that Clinton will be traveling abroad next week, the invitation to the Nov. 15 hearing signaled a post-election renewal of a politically charged debate over the attack resulted in the death of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
    [...]
    Clinton is scheduled to travel next week to Australia, Singapore, Thailand, Burma and Cambodia
    **Written by Doug Powers http://michellemalkin.com/2012/11/10...aeus-benghazi/

    Being caught in an affair is not a get-out-of-hearing testimony card. That being said, I look for Obama to invoke executive privilege as he did in the F&F scandal. Petraeus dishonored himself by having the affair but I suspect he would give honest testimony, under oath, necessitating an invoking of executive privilege. Anyone else here who thinks Obama wants to keep this four star general from testifying?

    ..

    Wake up Gowdy, you’re a good man, but the only way Petraeus is going to tell you anything is under oath.

    Requiem for the Mainstream Media, All hail the New Media. http://thewildernessofmirrors.wordpr...the-new-media/

    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  8. #62
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Another interesting claim about Petraeus and Broadwell
    http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives...and-broadwell/

    Femme fatale: Threats, explicit emails, and sex under the desk define Petraeus affair http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/10/fe...traeus-affair/

    WaPo: Broadwell sent threatening e-mails to another woman close to Petraeus
    http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives...e-to-petraeus/

    Petraeus Resigns; Will Not Testify — Or So the Democrats Think . . .
    http://patterico.com/2012/11/09/petr...mocrats-think/
    Last edited by Jolie Rouge; 11-11-2012 at 02:09 PM.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  9. #63

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,400
    Thanks
    849
    Thanked 444 Times in 312 Posts
    didn't hillary take responsibility as secretary of state for the deaths of 4 americans and wanted to find those responsible? Didn't obama also take responsibility for those murdered? didn't obama point fingers at hillary and Petraeus? amazing that this government cries foul and wants to get the facts but those people with possible answers for one reason or another will not be around for the hearing? it appears the only person around will be the film maker and that's because he has been sentenced to prison.

  10. #64
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    11/11/2012


    Petraeus Paramour Penned Poisonous Paperwork

    The woman who helped Petraeus cheat on his wife was upset because she thought he was cheating on her.

    She will not be ignored! http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...684_print.html

    The collapse of the dazzling career of CIA Director David H. Petraeus was triggered when a woman with whom he was having an affair sent threatening e-mails to another woman close to him, according to three senior law enforcement officials with knowledge of the episode.

    The recipient of the e-mails was so frightened that she went to the FBI for protection and help tracking down the sender, according to the officials. The FBI investigation traced the threats to Paula Broadwell, a former military officer and a Petraeus biographer, and uncovered explicit e-mails between Broadwell and Petraeus, the officials said…
    I still want him to testify. And I still want to know when Obama knew about this affair.

    http://patterico.com/2012/11/11/petr...ous-paperwork/
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  11. #65
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    comments

    The FBI na iled him months ago, and were told to “stand down” until after the election. Of course the FBI Director had to immediately inform the White House when it discovered the DCI was the surprise target of their investigation. Our national security was put at risk to avoid embarrassing Obama in an election year.

    But testify? When his conduct could get him court-martialed even after retiring? He’ll take the 5th on the first question – and would be insane not to, unless granted full immunity.

    ..

    Was this written about Petraeus?
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/ma...om-beyond.html

    Instapundit linked to it last night, but without asking that question.

    ..

    When and under what circumstances did the husband find this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gQEDwjhaDE

    ..

    The article only goes this far in characterizing the reason behind the threatening email:, that Broadwell perceived the recipient as a threat to,her relationship with P4

    What kind of threat is unspecified, and the nature of that woman’s relationship to P4 per their article, is unknown.

    Point- Broadwell could have been concerned about exposure or some threat to inform his wife or other persons about the affair, or inform P4 about some conduct of Broadwell’s to pp4, or to counel P4 to end the affair or sever his connection with Broadwell, and not necessarily because she was a perceived romantic rival.
    There might noe even be any relationship to P4 on the part of that targeted individual, it could be a comforter or friend of her husbands, or someone who,had been confided in.

    We do not know the specifi content of the email…it , sure, might be “back up off my man” type threats, but it might instead be more like “keep your mouth shut if you kno what is good for you.

    There were others in their circle who saw the unprecedented access B. had to p4 and her flaunting of it, and who thought it was unwise or disturbing and who might have interfered or about to interfere or potentially interfere in that way.

    It’s hasty to claim this woman was perceived as a romantic rival for p4 s attentions and affections by Broadmoor.

    She might even be a contact of her husband’s and not p4s.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  12. #66
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    sorry for the choopy presentation ... trying to figure this out ...

    The following errors occurred with your submission

    A censored word was detected. Please do not use censored words in your posts.
    comments

    Tell me the space cadet loon from an earlier love triangle was not involved in this Petraeus one also. You know, the one who drove straight through to the space center? Perhaps the current fiasco explains the General’s reticence vis a vis Benghazi. What’s with Hillary! can’t be available to testify to congress because she’s too busy. Who spreads the propaga nda that everyone thinks she’s done a ba ng up job as SecState? Does anyone recall her history as a lying sack of s hit e during Whitewater and beyond? And dissembler at the UN Susan Rice could be her replacement? The inmates are running the asylum. An administration which applies the Peter Principle top to bottom, eh? But have no fear as Emperor tells us dear leader will make us all happy and prosperous.

    ..

    I’d like to know more also. But I don’t see how this could have been used to control Patraeus with respect to Benghazi. “If you lie to the public we will keep this secret and let you retire amid public humiliation a few weeks/months later.” Where’s the upside for Patraeus?


    ...

    There is no upside for Petraeus. This is damage control by s ex-sc andal distraction, as best as I can see right now. For an administration who had a compromised CinC in Afghanistan and then appointed him Director of the CIA.

    Petraeus should have been removed from Afghanistan when the aff air was going on. He should never have been appointed Director of the CIA.

    Stutt ering Clu ster ** ** of A Miserable Failure.



    ..

    It’s the law: the WH is informed about high-ranking executive branch members that come under FBI investigation. It’s been the law since watergate.


    ..

    If P4 is compromised enough to resign now, he was then. At minimum there is covering for appearances sake over security to keep it from affecting the election.

    I want to know what happened with the security in Benghazi and the failure to prepare, be ready, or intervene in a foreseeable attack on Americans on American soil, on 9/11, by a known al quaeda presence, and why that attack was mischaracterized as it was for so long. I want to know exactly what happened.

    If Petraeus was kept to heel by his situation, distracted by his situation, not allowed to make decisions because of his situation , we should know. If his scheduled testimony is blocked or altered because of his situation, we need to know if that results from a deliberate strategic move to prevent it, or if Petraeus resigned in order to speak freely.

    The wording of his resignation minimizeshis reason for resigning, and is strange in its specificity, especially when one considers the esteem with which his wife is held and the work she has done, and the humiliation specificity brings to her.

    It’s clearly meant to distract from a more serious issue of security breach, and to prevent speculation damaging to Obama.[/i]
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in