Page 6 of 13 First ... 2345678910 ... Last
  1. #56
    janelle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    20,772
    Thanks
    1,730
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,527 Posts

    There are also going to be rallies on March 23rd

    http://standupforreligiousfreedom.com/

    Look up your city if you want to be involved.

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement Obama Administration: Health Insurers Must Cover Birth Control With No Copays
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #57
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    This isn’t a battle over access to birth control. You can head on over to Target and pay $5 for the prescription. No one’s stopping ya, honey. Go buy it for all your friends, too, and then you won’t even have to go to any more baby showers.

    But please don’t tell me that you now fear Republican candidates because they want to “decide on women’s reproductive issues.”

    I don’t care what you do. But don’t force me to pay for it. Don’t force the Church to pay for it. Pay for it out of your own damn purse at the Target check out line rather than looking to Big Brother Government to take care of you (and how patriarchal is that?!)

    This isn’t a battle for access.

    This is a war over who will pay. And if you’re not willing to fund your own sex life, then you have no business telling me that I have to.

    I loathe this pandering to women! Don’t treat us like we’re stupid. Don’t act like we need your special protection. Don’t buy us things.


    Last edited by Jolie Rouge; 03-14-2012 at 01:21 PM.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jolie Rouge For This Useful Post:

    janelle (03-13-2012)

  5. #58
    pepperpot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    exactly where I should be...
    Posts
    8,566
    Thanks
    4,402
    Thanked 3,793 Times in 2,027 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge View Post
    This isn’t a battle for access.

    This is a war over who will pay. And if you’re not willing to fund your own sex life, then you have no business telling me that I have to.

    I loathe this pandering to women! Don’t treat us like we’re stupid. Don’t act like we need your special protection. Don’t buy us things.
    I cannot believe how many women that I know of who are falling for this......or are going along with this.
    Mrs Pepperpot is a lady who always copes with the tricky situations that she finds herself in....

  6. #59
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  7. #60
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    March 19, 2012

    Bristol Palin to President Obama: I look forward to your call, sir

    Sure, we’re all disgusted by Obama’s cynical use of his own daughters to silence his political opponents: “I want Malia and Sasha to be able to speak their minds without being attacked and called horrible names, but you Republican gals are on your own.” As repulsive and hypocritical as that was, just imagine how you’d feel about it if you’d ever been the direct target of a left-wing misogynist and Obama supporter like Bill “Million Dollar” Maher.

    You don’t have to imagine it, because Bristol Palin tells you about it in an open letter to POTUS: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bristol...ect-your-call/

    Dear President Obama,

    You don’t know my telephone number, but I hope your staff is busy trying to find it. Ever since you called Sandra Fluke after Rush Limbaugh called her a slut, I figured I might be next. You explained to reporters you called her because you were thinking of your two daughters, Malia and Sasha. After all, you didn’t want them to think it was okay for men to treat them that way:

    “One of the things I want them to do as they get older is engage in issues they care about, even ones I may not agree with them on,” you said. “I want them to be able to speak their mind in a civil and thoughtful way. And I don’t want them attacked or called horrible names because they’re being good citizens.”

    And I totally agree your kids should be able to speak their minds and engage the culture. I look forward to seeing what good things Malia and Sasha end up doing with their lives.

    But here’s why I’m a little surprised my phone hasn’t rung. Your $1,000,000 donor Bill Maher has said reprehensible things about my family. He’s made fun of my brother because of his Down’s Syndrome. He’s said I was “f—-d so hard a baby fell out.” (In a classy move, he did this while his producers put up the cover of my book, which tells about the forgiveness and redemption I’ve found in God after my past – very public — mistakes.)

    If Maher talked about Malia and Sasha that way, you’d return his dirty money and the Secret Service would probably have to restrain you. After all, I’ve always felt you understood my plight more than most because your mom was a teenager. That’s why you stood up for me when you were campaigning against Sen. McCain and my mom — you said vicious attacks on me should be off limits.

    Yet I wonder if the Presidency has changed you. Now that you’re in office, it seems you’re only willing to defend certain women. You’re only willing to take a moral stand when you know your liberal supporters will stand behind you.

    But…

    What if you did something radical and wildly unpopular with your base and took a stand against the denigration of all women… even if they’re just single moms? Even if they’re Republicans?

    I’m not expecting your SuperPAC to return the money. You’re going to need every dime to hang on to your presidency. I’m not even really expecting a call. But would it be too much to expect a little consistency? After all, you’re President of all Americans, not just the liberals.
    http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/19/br...#ixzz1pa5AwQgw


    comments

    the proof is in his actions…if my dog bites two of my neighbors and I apologize and make amends to one but to the other I say nothing and in fact take no action to ensure that the dog does not bite them again…what message would my neighbors recieve from that action? Lets make no mistake..Bill Maher is Obama’s dog and if Obama were to take even the most meager efforts to show displeasure in Maher’s sexiest and obscene comments then Maher would not continue. The fact that Obama refuses to condemn his comments and welcomes his money tells him and everyone else that Obama is fine with Maher attacking young conservative women in the most vile and degrading ways.

    ...

    Obama apologized to Fluke FOR Limbaugh but didn’t apologize to Palin FOR Maher for calling her a C*nt… Obama is encouraging this behavior by not taking a stand for ALL woman and returning Bill Maher’s $1,000,000 contribution.

    ...

    The President is decent only as it is politically expedient to him to be so.

    It was pandering and expedient for him to call the Fluke woman to apologize, when she was the past president of of the LSFR, “Law Students For Reproductive Justice”… and had in the past openly voiced her reason for enrolling in Georgetown being to stir up JUST such a controversy. She is a leftist radical PLANT, nothing more, who was invited by Nancy Pelosi to speak before this so-called committee.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012...ghts-activist/

    The double-standard exhibited by this so-called “President” is beyond reprehensible.

    Bristol Palin’s blog is concise, wonderfully worded, without the use of a single epithet, and is irrefutably accurate and logical.

    She takes after her mother in regards to her intelligence, despite what all of the liberal media ‘talking heads’, evidently both here AND in Canada, have to say.

    ...

    Canadian Observer – if you’re really trying to be as your monicker indicates then you really should pay attention. I didn’t read anything from Bristol that says she requires an apology from the hypocrit-in-chief; she’s wondering when she’ll receive her “Fluke call.” That I’m aware of, Obama didn’t insult Fluke either. Yet he felt compelled to call her expressing support and outrage for the way she was treated by a conservative talk show host.

    As for Bristol and her family (ex-her Mom) being “public figures” – are you suggesting that relatives are now “fair game” by virtue of the parents entering the public arena? Because the Palin children have been attacked since Day 1! Does it follow then – in your opinion – that Obama’s daughters should be the subject of ridicule? Obama is a hypocrit – and so are all those who feign outrage for comments hurtful to Sandra Fluke – a public activist – yet somehow manage to justify vicious attacks on conservatives and/or their families. Anyone who thinks differently is simply a pathological partisan!

    ...

    Obama called Sandra Fluke and put his nose squarely into this arena. His hypocrisy is crying out as he was using Rush’s poor words in an attempt to continue the “Republican war on women” narrative his campaign is espousing.

    What Ms. Palin is pointing out is obvious…Obama doesn’t give a wit about women or what is said about them. He cares about a liberal mantra that the right is against women. He’s happy to accept 1 million from one of the biggest misogynists out there and keep his mouth shut while he does it… As usual, Obama has shown his true colors… do and say anything to get elected.


    ...

    Fluke is a self-described activist who put herself in the public eye. Isn’t testifying on camera before a mock Congressional hearing “presenting yourself in the public arena”? That’s what Sandra Fluke did, and Limbaugh’s shot at her evoked President Obama’s very public concern and condemnation. I fail to see a meaningful distinction between the two.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  8. #61
    janelle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    20,772
    Thanks
    1,730
    Thanked 2,526 Times in 1,527 Posts
    The word "sugar daddy" has been spinning in my head recently. I am thinking Obama has a new name. LOL

    Did anyone see the interview with Lady Gaga last night on the OWN network with Oprah? I do believe I saw Secretary of Health, Kathleen Sebelius at the Harvard interview where Lady Gaga announced her new program against bullying. Just a flash of her really. Nothing else but a flash. Her grey hair is very distinctive.

    I wonder if even Lady Gaga does not want to get into this issue of making the churches supply BC for all women. Seems Gaga is Catholic and she may not want to get sucked into it. Good for her. Talk about bullying from Obama's administration.

  9. #62
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Destroying private health insurance was always the goal
    By Michelle Malkin • May 16, 2012 09:40 AM

    Put on your shocked faces: The first Catholic college has announced it is dropping its student health insurance plan in the wake of the White House refusal to repeal the religious liberty-sabotaging Obamacare birth control/abortion mandate.

    Life News has the scoop: http://www.lifenews.com/2012/05/15/o...rop-insurance/

    Franciscan University appears to be the first casualty of the new Obama HHS mandate that requires Catholic colleges, groups and businesses to pay for drugs that may cause abortions and birth control for their employees.

    Although President Barack Obama declared “If you like your health care coverage you can keep it,” when it came to passing Obamacare, a Catholic college in Ohio has determined it will no longer offer a student health insurance plan. “The Obama Administration has mandated that all health insurance plans must cover “women’s health services” including contraception, sterilization, and abortion-causing medications as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA),” the university says in a new post on its website. “Up to this time, Franciscan University has specifically excluded these services and products from its student health insurance policy, and we will not participate in a plan that requires us to violate the consistent teachings of the Catholic Church on the sacredness of human life.”
    More from the school’s website: http://www.franciscan.edu/StudentHealthInsurance/

    Due to these changes in regulation by the federal government, beginning with the 2012-13 school year, the University 1) will no longer require that all full-time undergraduate students carry health insurance, 2) will no longer offer a student health insurance plan, and 3) will no longer bill those not covered under a parent/guardian plan or personal plan for student health insurance. The current student health insurance plan will expire on August 15, 2012.
    Destroying private health insurance was always the goal of health care “reform“.

    Always.

    http://michellemalkin.com/2012/05/16...ways-the-goal/

    Catholic college drops health plan over contraception mandate
    By Stephanie Simon | Reuters – Tue, May 15, 2012

    DENVER (Reuters) - A small Catholic college in Ohio said Tuesday it was dropping health insurance coverage for students rather than comply with a federal mandate that the plan provide free birth control.

    The Franciscan University of Steubenville "will not participate in a plan that requires us to violate the consistent teachings of the Catholic Church on the sacredness of human life," according to a bulletin to students posted on the university's website.

    Not only will the university drop its own plan, but it will no longer require its undergraduates to carry insurance, the bulletin said. "We didn't want to put them in a situation where they would have to violate their conscience," said Michael Hernon, a vice president at Franciscan University.

    Fewer than 200 of the 2,500 students at the campus in southeast Ohio had been buying insurance from the university, Hernon said.

    The Obama administration announced earlier this year that insurance plans have to provide free contraception starting this summer, including the "morning-after pill," which prevents pregnancy if taken within a few days of unprotected sex.

    The administration considers birth control a preventive service which must be covered by all plans, akin to diabetes screening, childhood immunizations or mammograms.

    The Catholic Church teaches that the use of artificial contraception is a sin, though polls show the vast majority of Catholic women of reproductive age have used birth control at some point. Many Christians consider the morning-after pill to be an abortifacient because it can prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the womb.

    Obama tried to accommodate Catholic outrage over the mandate by giving religious institutions an extra year to comply and by assuring them they would not have to pay for the birth control coverage themselves; their insurers would pick up the tab.

    That appeased some Catholic groups but many others, including the powerful U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, remain implacably opposed.

    Several Catholic and evangelical Christian universities have challenged the contraceptive mandate in court. Those cases have not yet come to trial. Hernon said Franciscan University is weighing a lawsuit.

    Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court is considering a challenge to the broad health-care overhaul that is one of Obama's signature domestic accomplishments. If the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is invalidated by the Supreme Court, the contraceptive mandate would likely fall by the wayside as well.

    With the new health insurance year set to start in August, however, administrators at Franciscan University chose not to wait for the court's ruling. In addition to the contraception mandate, they said they were concerned that premiums for the student plan would rise because the Affordable Care Act also mandates other specific services be covered.

    So the bulletin advised students that they should begin to figure out "how you are going to provide for accidents or illnesses."

    The university will maintain its health insurance plan for faculty, for now. That plan does not cover birth control. Hernon said administrators are "looking at all the options" as they decide how, or whether, to continue the plan in the future if the contraceptive mandate is upheld.

    The university, which was founded 60 years ago to serve World War Two veterans, is ranked as one of the top-tier private colleges in the Midwest. It boasts on its website that its academics and culture are "grounded in a passionately Catholic faith tradition."

    http://news.yahoo.com/catholic-colle...212139993.html
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  10. #63
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Franciscan University Drops Entire Student Health Insurance Plan Over Birth Control Mandate
    Posted: 05/15/2012 3:14 pm Updated: 05/16/2012 12:34 pm

    Franciscan University of Steubenville, a Catholic institution in Ohio, has decided to drop its entire student health insurance plan as of the fall semester 2012 because of the new federal rule requiring contraception coverage under most employee and student health policies. While a number of religious colleges have filed lawsuits over the birth control requirement, Franciscan is the first to get rid of its student health plan. "The Obama Administration has mandated that all health insurance plans must cover 'women’s health services' including contraception, sterilization, and abortion-causing medications as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)," the school announced on its website. "Up to this time, Franciscan University has specifically excluded these services and products from its student health insurance policy, and we will not participate in a plan that requires us to violate the consistent teachings of the Catholic Church on the sacredness of human life."

    Therefore, the statement continued, the university will no longer offer student health insurance, require that all full-time undergrads have health insurance, or bill those students not covered under another plan for health insurance. The current plan expires on Aug. 15, 2012.

    The announcement is somewhat misleading. Under the new rule, Franciscan University would not have to pay for any student's contraception. The administration carved out an exemption for religious organizations, including Catholic schools, that would require the insurance company itself to pay for the insured's birth control coverage "directly and separately." Nonprofit schools that don't currently cover birth control can also qualify for a one-year transition period to comply with the new requirement.

    Further, the birth control mandate does not include any "abortion-causing medications." Rather, it includes emergency contraception, which prevents pregnancy. But the U.S. Catholic bishops have frequently and publicly objected to the contraception coverage requirement based on the claim that it includes "abortifacients."

    The university did not offer any alternatives to its nearly 3,000 undergraduate and graduate students, but it did suggest they begin looking for other ways to pay for health care. "We encourage you to decide how you are going to provide for accidents or illnesses requiring visits to physicians, health clinics, or the hospital emergency room while you are a student here," the announcement said.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1518678.html
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  11. #64
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Notre Dame sues Obama administration over birth control mandate
    By Liz Goodwin | The Ticket – 4 hrs ago

    President Barack Obama is hooded as he receives an honorary degree at the University of Notre Dame, May 17, 2009

    On Monday, the University of Notre Dame filed suit against the Obama administration over its rule that all employers must offer contraception in their insurance plans. Notre Dame is now the seventh religious college to sue over the mandate; it's also the largest school to do so. President Barack Obama gave the commencement address at the prominent Catholic university in 2009.

    In its suit, the school says that health care reform's contraception mandate violates its religious freedom and would require it to go against Catholic principles by offering contraception and sterilization to students and faculty in its insurance plan. The university serves 11,500 students of different religious faiths, and is traditionally led by a Catholic priest as president.

    The Obama administration announced in February that religious organizations such as schools and hospitals would not directly have to offer birth control to their employees. Instead, the insurance company would contact women covered by its plan and offer the contraception. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and other religious organizations objected to this, saying that the organizations' premiums would still be helping to pay for the contraception in that scenario. In its suit, the University of Notre Dame says it is self-insured, which means this accommodation would not work for it.

    A spokeswoman from the Department of Health and Human Services told Yahoo News that she couldn't comment on pending litigation, but that the department is still forming its contraception rule for self-insured religious schools. In a statement, Notre Dame President Father John Jenkins said he will continue to negotiate with the Obama administration on the rule. "We will continue in earnest our discussions with Administration officials in an effort to find a resolution, but, after much deliberation, we have concluded that we have no option but to appeal to the courts regarding the fundamental issue of religious freedom," he said.

    Employers' insurance plans will have to offer birth control without a co-pay starting in August, but religious organizations will have another year before they must do so. Churches are exempt from the rule entirely.

    When asked for a comment on the suit, the White House directed reporters to a transcript of Obama's February remarks about the mandate. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-...reventive-care



    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/n...160818824.html

    comments

    The separation of Church and State does not give the Government authority to impose their policies on religious organizations...in fact, the separation of Church and state protects the church from the Government and limits what they can impose!

    ...

    Hey Yahoo, it's not just one college it's a whole lot of Catholics suing Obama. I guess the headline "Catholics Sue Obama" was not a good title for this pro Obama website, it might turn off some needed swing state voters. This is the headline on CNS news which I wish Yahoo would use for some balance: "Cardinal Dolan of NY, Cardinal Wuerl of D.C., Notre Dame--And 40 Other Catholic Dioceses and Organizations--Sue Obama Administration".

    ...

    If anyone at Notre Dame doesn't want to practice birth control, they just shouldn't do it. No one is forcing them to do it. Why to they want to deprive others of the right to control their own bodies? The Roman church doesn't seem to realize that they haven't run the world since 1517.

    ...

    No one is saying they can not have access to birth control ... but no one should be FORCED to pay for SOMEONE ELSE'S birth control. Savvy ??

    ..

    They're being forced to pay for something that their religion says is immoral. No one - ND or otherwise - is preventing anyone from using contraceptives. The only one pushing others around here is Obama.

    ..

    farblond, Why do you think others must pay for YOUR lifestyle? If you want birth controll,BUY IT YOUR SELF.

    ..

    Birth control, as you observe is an individuals' choice. Entirely elective. A case can be made for making insurers pay for necessary medical care, but elective procedures should be between the insurer and the insured. The government shouldn't force anyone to pay for other people's wishes and wants.

    ..

    Hormonal birth control is administered by medical professionals because of the risks involved in the medicines, not because the doctors are treating any disorder. The same medicines are sometimes used to treat other conditions with birth control being incidental, a side effect if you will. Birth control is entirely elective. The recipient should be obliged to pay for their own elective medicines and procedures.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  12. #65
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Boom! Dozens of Catholic institutions file suits over HHS mandate
    May, 21, 2012 — nicedeb
    http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2012/05...r-hhs-mandate/



    As I said on the very first day the outrageous HHS contraception mandate came down, it was a huge tactical error for the Obama administration to pick a fight with the Catholic church during an election year. http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2012/01...me-on-wvideos/

    There was absolutely no way the church was going to lay down on such a critical life issue – in fact, they are going on the offense.

    Ed Morrissey at Hot Air reports: http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/2...r-hhs-mandate/

    Dozens of Catholic institutions filed lawsuits today against the Department of Health and Human Services over its mandate and its narrow definition of religious practice: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...-mandate/print

    Catholic archdioceses and institutions filed suit in federal district courts across the country Monday against the so-called contraception mandate, claiming their “fundamental rights hang in the balance.”

    The plaintiffs include a host of schools and organizations, including the University of Notre Dame and the Archdiocese of New York. The lawsuits, though related, were filed individually.

    The schools are objecting to the requirement from the federal health care overhaul that employers provide access to contraceptive care. The Obama administration several months back softened its position on the mandate, but some religious organizations complained the administration did not go far enough to ensure the rule would not compel them to violate their religious beliefs.



    Kathryn Jean Lopez posts a brief statement from Timothy Cardinal Dolan, president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops and one of the chief critics of the HHS mandate: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...yn-jean-lopez#

    We have tried negotiation with the Administration and legislation with the Congress – and we’ll keep at it – but there’s still no fix. Time is running out, and our valuable ministries and fundamental rights hang in the balance, so we have to resort to the courts now. Though the Conference is not a party to the lawsuits, we applaud this courageous action by so many individual dioceses, charities, hospitals and schools across the nation, in coordination with the law firm of Jones Day. It is also a compelling display of the unity of the Church in defense of religious liberty. It’s also a great show of the diversity of the Church’s ministries that serve the common good and that are jeopardized by the mandate – ministries to the poor, the sick, and the uneducated, to people of any faith or no faith at all.

    The institutions filing lawsuits don’t just comprise a few ultraconservative institutions, either. The University of Notre Dame hosted a speech by President Barack Obama in 2009, but today insists that Obama and his administration are attacking religious freedom in their complaint. http://opac.nd.edu/assets/69013/hhs_complaint.pdf


    Read Captain Ed’s entire post for more links, plus Franciscan University president, Father Terence Henry’s video statement. http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/2...r-hhs-mandate/


    The Obama administration’s attempts at misdirection on the issue – turning it into a debate about women’s rights and what-not - has ended up insulting the intelligence of women with working brain cells. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...scending-women Like Ed says,
    This oppressive move may well cast Catholics off from the Democratic Party for a generation. This will be a “come to Jesus” moment for many Catholics, and a wake-up call to the USCCB about the nature of government mandates in general.
    Better late than never.

    Cardinal Dolan, Cardinal Wuerl And 40 Other Catholic Dioceses And Organizations Sue Obama Administration « http://theamericanteaman.com/2012/05...dministration/
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  13. #66

    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    5,185
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked 852 Times in 390 Posts
    After my 3rd son was born, I wanted my tubes tied. I was told no because it was a catholic hospital. That was 1988. I did not know such things occurred then. Thank goodness or son #4 would not have been born 1 1/2 years later.

    me

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in