Thread: Rule by Fiat

I guess only Obama gets to use a "phone and a pen" ??



Did 47 Republican senators break the law in plain sight?
By Jeremy Diamond, CNN - Updated 5:42 PM ET, Tue March 10, 2015

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/10/politi...act/index.html

Why won’t Obama divulge any details of Iran deal?

Written by Allen West on March 10, 2015

Whether you voted for him or not, do you think President Obama should enter into a “deal” with Iran without divulging any of the details or seeking approval of your elected representatives?

This isn’t a partisan issue and it’s very troubling that 47 U.S. senators sent a letter to the Iranian regime – but not a single Democrat enjoined with that effort. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/10/wo...ders.html?_r=0 And yes, I do find it rather fascinating that Democrat Senator Robert Menendez, former chairman of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee and an outspoken critic of President Obama, finds himself potentially being indicted on corruption charges. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...ges/?tid=sm_tw Perhaps the message has been received — stay in line or else — after all this does seem to be the Chicago way.

Ponder this: there is potentially damaging policy being pursued by the Obama administration with which, come January 2017, others will have to contend.

If there’s one area where politics and campaign agendas should not prevail it is in the area of our national security. There is no real good side to entering into an agreement with the Iranians. And this is something with long-term ramifications for America long after Obama departs. What we fail to realize is that for Iran, time is of no concern. The Ayatollahs are unified in their objective and have been since the Jimmy Carter failure, which resulted in the return of the Islamic theocratic state and its ideology of death and supremacy.

Unfortunately, America does not have a unified national security strategy and therefore our pendulum swings back and forth, never finding equilibrium.

President Obama has threatened to veto any legislation renewing sanctions against Iran. He has threatened to veto any legislation requiring Congressional (Senate) approval of the Iranian deal. The question all of us must ask is simply why?

What is being hidden from the American people? It’s obviously something pretty critical, given President Obama’s response to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech.

How do we persuade the Iranians to stop seeking a nuclear capability? We must continue to do what brought them to their knees: economic sanctions to delegitimize their regime. We should produce and consume our own energy resources, export to Europe and blockade any oil shipments attempting to depart from Iran. We should demand full disclosure of Iran’s facilities — including those located deep underground. We should support the opposition leadership that just recently had a major conference and rally in Germany — why wasn’t an Obama administration representative there? Oops, that’s right, Mayor Rudy Giuliani was attended.

There is no conceivable reason why President Obama wouldn’t want to keep the hammer ready to fall on Iran. There is even less credence for the president not to want to share these negotiations with the U.S. Senate and seek its approval. A borderline treaty is being offered, something the president cannot do unilaterally — then again, it seems that doesn’t deter him at all.

So is Barack Obama about to make a binding agreement with an Islamic terror-sponsoring regime that is holding Americans prisoner? Is it possible Obama will sign away the future of national security of not just America, but also Israel — and if so, why?

Obama chided the 47 GOP senators who sent a letter to the Iranian regime suggesting they undermined his authority. I wonder what he said when then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi traveled to Syria to meet with Bashar Assad during the Bush administration – there’s no difference, as the Bush administration requested Nancy Pelosi refrain.

There is no doubt Iran is an enemy of the United States. What is it that confuses President Obama about this fact?

http://allenbwest.com/2015/03/why-wo...-of-iran-deal/

Originally Posted by boopster

why would he want to hug and kiss iran who has announced to the world that it wants to destroy us?

why does he want to throw us under the bus?

why is he being secretive about his negotiations?

Why isn't the MSM asking these questions ??

Obama calls for mandatory voting in U.S.

AS REPORTED BY THE WASHINGTON TIMES: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ory-voting-us/

President Obama, whose party was trounced in last year’s midterm election due to poor turnout among Democrats, endorsed the idea of mandatory voting Wednesday.

“It would be trans-formative if everybody voted,” Mr. Obama said during a town-hall event in Cleveland. “That would counteract [campaign] money more than anything. If everybody voted, then it would completely change the political map in this country.”

Mr. Obama raised the subject during a discussion of curbing the influence of campaign donations in U.S. elections. The president said he had never discussed the idea publicly before, but said Australia and some other countries have compulsory voting.

The president didn’t commit to pushing a mandatory voting initiative at the federal level but said, “that may end up being a better strategy in the short term” than finding a solution to curbing campaign donations.

http://allenwestrepublic.com/2015/03...voting-in-u-s/

all ppl voting....hmmmm.......we already have ppl not qualified to vote who are voting. even if we made id necessary to vote/register to vote there would still be ppl who are not qualified. heck the irs gives illegals refunds. we do not have qualfied government employees who are able or want to differentiate between american citizens and non citizens. could he think that all these illegals he wants to give amnesty will vote only for democrats? "“It would be trans-formative if everybody voted,” Mr. Obama " said - perhaps it would be trans-formative if fraud was not allowed, politicians were honest, and government were truly transparent!

Obama’s 19 secret “laws” that you have to obey: Directives you’re not allow to see yet!
Since Obama took office in 2008, he has issued at total of 30 Presidential Decision Directives, 19 of which remain classified and are kept secret not only from the American public but also from Congress.


Tuesday, July 7, 2015 3:10

Since Obama took office in 2008, he has issued at total of 30 Presidential Decision Directives, 19 of which remain classified and are kept secret not only from the American public but also from Congress.

Secret laws of the land that remain classified? While that may seem tyrannical and a bit sci-fi, that is exactly what is happening here in America.

In fact, these directives were set into motion in 1947 with President Truman and since Obama took office in 2008, he has issued at total of 30 PPD’s, 19 of which remain classified and are kept secret not only from the American public but also from Congress. They can harbor information on cybersecurity, nuclear weapons, space policy, civil breakdown, and plans for the government in case of disaster.

These directives are demolishing the very foundation of our Constitution and granting Obama the power of a tyrant. Here is the breaking report, please don’t miss this!



http://right.is/politics/2015/07/oba...yet-31892.html

The libs (pelosi) want to kill the farms for development. They have been slowly turning off the water for decades. California products nearly half of US grown fruits and vegetables. Wouldn't importing contribute more greenhouse gases and make a bigger footprint. I love how libs never think

http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/11/he...hat-you-think/