Page 47 of 49 First ... 2743444546474849 Last
  1. #507
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    February 3, 1870 After passing House with 98% Republican support and 97% Democrat opposition, Republicans’ 15th Amendment is ratified, granting vote to all Americans regardless of race.

    May 19, 1870 African-American John Langston, law professor and future Republican Congressman from Virginia, delivers influential speech supporting President Ulysses Grant’s civil rights policies.

    May 31, 1870 President U.S. Grant signs Republicans’ Enforcement Act, providing stiff penalties for depriving any American’s civil rights.

    June 22, 1870 Republican Congress creates U.S. Department of Justice, to safeguard the civil rights of African-Americans against Democrats in the South.

    September 6, 1870 Women vote in Wyoming, in FIRST election after women’s suffrage signed into law by Republican Gov. John Campbell.

    February 28, 1871 Republican Congress passes Enforcement Act providing federal protection for African-American voters.

    March 22, 1871 Spartansburg Republican newspaper denounces Ku Klux Klan campaign to eradicate the Republican Party in South Carolina.

    April 20, 1871 Republican Congress enacts the Ku Klux Klan Act, outlawing Democratic Party-affiliated terrorist groups which oppressed African-Americans.

    October 10, 1871 Following warnings by Philadelphia Democrats against black voting, African-American Republican civil rights activist Octavius Catto murdered by Democratic Party operative; his military funeral was attended by thousands.

    October 18, 1871 After violence against Republicans in South Carolina, President Ulysses Grant deploys U.S. troops to combat Democrat terrorists who formed the Ku Klux Klan.

    November 18, 1872 Susan B. Anthony arrested for voting, after boasting to Elizabeth Cady Stanton that she voted for “the Republican ticket, straight”.

    January 17, 1874 Armed Democrats seize Texas state government, ending Republican efforts to racially integrate government.

    September 14, 1874 Democrat white supremacists seize Louisiana statehouse in attempt to overthrow racially-integrated administration of Republican Governor William Kellogg; 27 killed.

    March 1, 1875 Civil Rights Act of 1875, guaranteeing access to public accommodations without regard to race, signed by Republican President U.S. Grant; passed with 92% Republican support over 100% Democrat opposition.

    September 20, 1876 Former state Attorney General Robert Ingersoll (R-IL) tells veterans: “Every man that loved slavery better than liberty was a Democrat… I am a Republican because it is the only free party that ever existed”.

    January 10, 1878 U.S. Senator Aaron Sargent (R-CA) introduces Susan B. Anthony amendment for women’s suffrage; Democrat-controlled Senate defeated it 4 times before election of Republican House and Senate guaranteed its approval in 1919.

    July 14, 1884 Republicans criticize Democratic Party’s nomination of racist U.S. Senator Thomas Hendricks (D-IN) for vice president; he had voted against the 13th Amendment banning slavery.

    August 30, 1890 Republican President Benjamin Harrison signs legislation by U.S. Senator Justin Morrill (R-VT) making African-Americans eligible for land-grant colleges in the South.

    June 7, 1892 In a FIRST for a major U.S. political party, two women – Theresa Jenkins and Cora Carleton – attend Republican National Convention in an official capacity, as alternate delegates.

    February 8, 1894 Democrat Congress and Democrat President Grover Cleveland join to repeal Republicans’ Enforcement Act, which had enabled African-Americans to vote.

    December 11, 1895 African-American Republican and former U.S. Rep. Thomas Miller (R-SC) denounces new state constitution written to disenfranchise African-Americans.

    May 18, 1896 Republican Justice John Marshall Harlan, dissenting from Supreme Court’s notorious Plessy v. Ferguson “separate but equal” decision, declares: “Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens”.

    December 31, 1898 Republican Theodore Roosevelt becomes Governor of New York; in 1900, he outlawed racial segregation in New York public schools.

    December 31, 1898 Republican Theodore Roosevelt becomes Governor of New York; in 1900, he outlawed racial segregation in New York public schools.

    May 24, 1900 Republicans vote no in referendum for constitutional convention in Virginia, designed to create a new state constitution disenfranchising African-Americans.

    January 15, 1901 Republican Booker T. Washington protests Alabama Democratic Party’s refusal to permit voting by African-Americans.

    October 16, 1901 President Theodore Roosevelt invites Booker T. Washington to dine at White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country.

    May 29, 1902 Virginia Democrats implement new state constitution, condemned by Republicans as illegal, reducing African-American voter registration by 86%.

    February 12, 1909 On 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, African-American Republicans and women’s suffragists Ida Wells and Mary Terrell co-found the NAACP.

    June 18, 1912 African-American Robert Church, founder of Lincoln Leagues to register black voters in Tennessee, attends 1912 Republican National Convention as delegate; eventually serves as delegate at 8 conventions.

    August 1, 1916 Republican presidential candidate Charles Evans Hughes, former New York Governor and U.S. Supreme Court Justice, endorses women’s suffrage constitutional amendment; he would become Secretary of State and Chief Justice.

    May 21, 1919 Republican House passes constitutional amendment granting women the vote with 85% of Republicans in favor, but only 54% of Democrats; in Senate, 80% of Republicans would vote yes, but almost half of Democrats no.

    April 18, 1920 Minnesota’s FIRST-in-the-nation anti-lynching law, promoted by African-American Republican Nellie Francis, signed by Republican Gov. Jacob Preus.

    August 18, 1920 Republican-authored 19th Amendment, giving women the vote, becomes part of Constitution; 26 of the 36 states to ratify had Republican-controlled legislatures.

    January 26, 1922 House passes bill authored by U.S. Rep. Leonidas Dyer (R-MO) making lynching a federal crime; Senate Democrats block it with filibuster.

    June 2, 1924 Republican President Calvin Coolidge signs bill passed by Republican Congress granting U.S. citizenship to all Native Americans.

    October 3, 1924 Republicans denounce three-time Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National Convention.

    December 8, 1924 Democratic presidential candidate John W. Davis argues in favor of “separate but equal”.

    June 12, 1929 First Lady Lou Hoover invites wife of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an African-American, to tea at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country.

    August 17, 1937 Republicans organize opposition to former Ku Klux Klansman and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black, appointed to U.S. Supreme Court by FDR; his Klan background was hidden until after confirmation.

    June 24, 1940 Republican Party platform calls for integration of the armed forces; for the balance of his terms in office, FDR refuses to order it.

    October 20, 1942 60 prominent African-Americans issue Durham Manifesto, calling on southern Democrats to abolish their all-white primaries.

    April 3, 1944 U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Texas Democratic Party’s “whites only” primary election system.

    August 8, 1945 Republicans condemn Harry Truman’s surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. The whining and criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the Hiroshima bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a friend that “[t]he use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul.”

    February 18, 1946 Appointed by Republican President Calvin Coolidge, federal judge Paul McCormick ends segregation of Mexican-American children in California public schools.

    July 11, 1952 Republican Party platform condemns “duplicity and insincerity” of Democrats in racial matters.
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement Isn't This Racism ??
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #508
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    September 30, 1953 Earl Warren, California’s three-term Republican Governor and 1948 Republican vice presidential nominee, nominated to be Chief Justice; wrote landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education.

    December 8, 1953 Eisenhower administration Asst. Attorney General Lee Rankin argues for plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education.

    May 17, 1954 Chief Justice Earl Warren, three-term Republican Governor (CA) and Republican vice presidential nominee in 1948, wins unanimous support of Supreme Court for school desegregation in Brown v. Board of Education.

    November 25, 1955 Eisenhower administration bans racial segregation of interstate bus travel.

    March 12, 1956 Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation.

    June 5, 1956 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in decision striking down “blacks in the back of the bus” law.

    October 19, 1956 On campaign trail, Vice President Richard Nixon vows: “American boys and girls shall sit, side by side, at any school – public or private – with no regard paid to the color of their skin. Segregation, discrimination, and prejudice have no place in America”.

    November 6, 1956 African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President.

    September 9, 1957 President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Party’s 1957 Civil Rights Act.

    September 24, 1957 Sparking criticism from Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, President Dwight Eisenhower deploys the 82nd Airborne Division to Little Rock, AR to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public schools.

    June 23, 1958 President Dwight Eisenhower meets with Martin Luther King and other African-American leaders to discuss plans to advance civil rights.

    February 4, 1959 President Eisenhower informs Republican leaders of his plan to introduce 1960 Civil Rights Act, despite staunch opposition from many Democrats.

    May 6, 1960 President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming 125-hour, around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats.

    July 27, 1960 At Republican National Convention, Vice President and eventual presidential nominee Richard Nixon insists on strong civil rights plank in platform.

    May 2, 1963 Republicans condemn Democrat sheriff of Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2,000 African-American schoolchildren marching for their civil rights.

    June 1, 1963 Democrat Governor George Wallace announces defiance of court order issued by Republican federal judge Frank Johnson to integrate University of Alabama.

    September 29, 1963 Gov. George Wallace (D-AL) defies order by U.S. District Judge Frank Johnson, appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower, to integrate Tuskegee High School.

    June 9, 1964 Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still serves in the Senate.

    June 10, 1964 Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a staggering majority of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most southern Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists—one of them being Al Gore Sr. Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on Illinois Senator Everett Dirkson, the Republican leader from Illinois, to get the Act passed.

    June 20, 1964 The Chicago Defender, renowned African-American newspaper, praises Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) for leading passage of 1964 Civil Rights Act.

    March 7, 1965 Police under the command of Democrat Governor George Wallace attack African-Americans demonstrating for voting rights in Selma, AL.

    March 21, 1965 Republican federal judge Frank Johnson authorizes Martin Luther King’s protest march from Selma to Montgomery, overruling Democrat Governor George Wallace.

    August 4, 1965 Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose.

    August 6, 1965 Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats vote in favor.

    July 8, 1970 In special message to Congress, President Richard Nixon calls for reversal of policy of forced termination of Native American rights and benefits.

    September 17, 1971 Former Ku Klux Klan member and Democrat U.S. Senator Hugo Black (D-AL) retires from U.S. Supreme Court; appointed by FDR in 1937, he had defended Klansmen for racial murders.

    February 19, 1976 President Gerald Ford formally rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s notorious Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII.

    September 15, 1981 President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal education programs.

    June 29, 1982 President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act.

    August 10, 1988 Republican President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World War II internment ordered by FDR.

    November 21, 1991 Republican President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen federal civil rights legislation.

    August 20, 1996 Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes law.

    April 26, 1999 Legislation authored by U.S. Senator Spencer Abraham (R-MI) awarding Congressional Gold Medal to civil rights pioneer Rosa Parks is transmitted to President.

    January 25, 2001 U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee declares school choice to be “Educational Emancipation”.

    March 19, 2003 Republican U.S. Representatives of Hispanic and Portuguese descent form Congressional Hispanic Conference.

    May 23, 2003 U.S. Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) introduces bill to establish National Museum of African American History and Culture.

    February 26, 2004 Hispanic Republican U.S. Rep. Henry Bonilla (R-TX) condemns racist comments by U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown (D-FL); she had called Asst. Secretary of State Roger Noriega and several Hispanic Congressmen “a bunch of white men…you all look alike to me”

    I should also point out that The Klu Klux Klan was created by the democrats for the express reason of terrorizing blacks and republicans in the south to prevent them from voting, and that every known Klansman that were members of congress have been democrats.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2483126/posts
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jolie Rouge For This Useful Post:

    boopster (06-28-2015)

  5. #509

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,400
    Thanks
    849
    Thanked 444 Times in 312 Posts
    unfortunately we have some fast talking democrats who claim that today's republicans are yesterday's democrats and today's democrats are yesterdays republicans and therefore the the republicans of todays are prejudiced against blacks...and they even claim that black republicans are prejudiced against blacks.............and we have ppl who believe those democrats when will ppl start using their brains and not swallow hogwash?

  6. #510
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    A Clown In Black Face? Is That Ok To Say Cause You’re Gay, Takei?
    Alfonzo Rachel on July 3, 2015 at 5:25 pm


    Again, I’ll remind y’all that democrats fail to grasp that all bigots believe they are justified. Hey George Takei, when democrats fought to keep those slaves in chains and whip them on the back as you mentioned – trying to spice up your race baiting vent, it was democrats that felt justified to make black folks property to do that to! I guess they didn’t teach that part in Twelve Years a Slave.


    You wanna talk about black face? Thomas D. Rice was a democrat who put on black face and created the Jim Crow Minstrel. The democrats imposed laws that denied civil rights to blacks and called them the Jim Crow Laws, named after Thomas D. Rice’s character.


    The democrat Woodrow Wilson showed Birth of a Nation in the White House; a movie that glorified the KKK and featured men in black face.


    So for George Takei to try to belittle someone by referring to black face, well he’s just sticking true to democrat form, but please remember, all bigots feel justified with their bigotry. Democrats wear the crown on this.


    The Nazis felt justified with they’re bigotry. The democrats also feel justified in demanding socialist policies just like the Nazis and democrats still despise Israel – just like the Jew hating Nazis and the Jew hating KKK. They’re all cut from the same cloth. Or should I say cut from the same sheet?


    George Takei is just trying to be adored as a champion and is trying to play up self righteous indigence to make himself look like he’s a good gay man of the people.


    Self righteous people rarely actually listen to what other people say, and they’ll twist what others say to cause drama.


    George Takei tried to give Clarence Thomas a tip for a history lesson and implied that he needs to watch Twelve Years a Slave.


    George Takei should actually read from some of the works of people who were around during that time, like Frederick Douglas. Had George Takei read Douglas’s writings, he would have known what Clarence Thomas was talking about. Hell, if George Takei had read the BIBLE, he would have known exactly what Clarence Thomas was talking about! But then again, like the liberal Takei is, he wouldn’t know the Truth if it died for him.


    It’s simple George, yes slaves had dignity. Frederick Douglas, who was made to ride in a separate train car for cargo basically said, “… who is the one without dignity, me, or the ones who would make me ride in a segregated train car?”


    I say to you assuredly, Frederick Douglas was the dignified man.


    When Jesus was bound and tortured His dignity was never really lost, the ones who were really undignified were the ones who afflicted Him.


    The ones who lack dignity are the ones like George Takei who joins those who have always spat at Christ, despite what Christ offered them.


    So yes George, slaves had dignity. The ones who had no dignity are the ones like those democrats you dig so much who’ve always deprived others of their God given rights.


    Dignity is not something the government bestows, George. Dignity is already ours. We’re created in the image of God. When a person despises or forgets that truth and imposes their will on another human being, the imposer is the one without dignity. See how that works?


    George Takei lets his hatred of America slip as he recounts what America took from his parents, but doesn’t seem to have a problem with the more than 30 million lives the Japanese government took during WW2. How’s that for dignity? He also seems to overlook that the internment proclamation was issued by the democrat, FDR.


    So the actual bigot and the one lacking clarity here is you, George.


    But I know, you’re a liberal democrat so you get a pass. You’re justified and it’s fine for you to express your true rainbow colors of bigotry.

    You’re liberal, you’re gay and you’re George Takei.


    Below is what Clarence Thomas said and George Takei’s vent. You really have to be a backwards individual to not understand what Justice Thomas meant, and then twist what he said into something to be hatefully angry over.


    “Human dignity has long been understood in this country to be innate. When the Framers proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal” and “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,” they referred to a vision of mankind in which all humans are created in the image of God and therefore of inherent worth. That vision is the foundation upon which this Nation was built.

    The corollary of that principle is that human dignity cannot be taken away by the government. Slaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity) because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.” – Justice Clarence Thomas


    Compare that to what George Takei said, and an honest person can see who the truly hateful one is.



    http://alfonzorachel.com/2363/a-clow...4ROcccW0Oc4.99
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  7. #511
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    This morning we reported on George Takei’s racist rant against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

    Well Mark Levin took it to the next level today, opening his show with a masterful takedown of Takei and it’s definitely something you should listen to below:

    http://therightscoop.com/listen-mark...#ixzz3esBqIozi
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Jolie Rouge For This Useful Post:

    boopster (07-03-2015)

  9. #512
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Rutgers Professor: All White People Must Consider Themselves "The Face Of The Oppressor"
    By Spencer Raley | July 23, 2015


    In a piece for Salon this morning, Rutgers University professor Brittney Cooper proclaimed that all black people are “one police encounter from the grave,” and that white people must start lumping themselves together as “ the face of the oppressor.” http://www.salon.com/2015/07/23/blac..._sandra_bland/

    This piece comes after Sandra Bland, an African-American women, was found dead in her cell following a dramatic arrest in Texas earlier this week. Police have labeled the death a suicide, and are pointing to new evidence that would support this claim. Bland’s family is disputing this claim, and have ordered their own autopsy to follow up the one performed by the state.

    Cooper was very clear in her condemnation of this officer, despite the fact that investigations have hardly even begun. In her mind, he is guilty of much more than abuse of power during a traffic stop. He is guilty of the standard crime that all white males are guilty of– supremacy:

    Nothing about this officer’s actions were legal. It is the evidence of Sandra Bland’s irritation that caused this officer to escalate. He firmly expected to be able to harass a citizen going about her business and have her be okay with it. He expected that she wouldn’t question him. He wanted her submission. Her deference. Her fear. White power. Black submission. It’s the oldest trick in the white supremacist handbook. The officer might think he wanted Sandra Bland’s respect. But what he really wanted was her fear. And the fact is: He is entitled to neither. She did not owe him either her respect or her fear. When his white maleness and his badge didn’t elicit the first, he used the power of that badge to compel the second.
    She goes on to let us know that no matter what comes to light during the investigation into Bland’s death, her mind is made up:

    Now Sandra Bland is dead. She isn’t dead because of suicide. No matter what they say, justice, reason, fairness and good damn sense compel us to believe differently.
    Not only is her mind made up on the Bland case, her mind is made up on police and white people in general– That they’re narcissistic, dangerous bullies:

    Black people, of every station, live everyday just one police encounter from the grave. Looking back over my encounters with police, it’s truly a wonder that I’m still in the land of the living.
    Am I supposed to be grateful for that? Are we supposed to be grateful each and every time the police don’t kill us?

    There is a way that white people in particular treat Black people, as though we should be grateful to them
    She ends her racist tirade with a suggestion on how white people should feel about their alleged evil -- An evil that cannot be overcome because it is inherited by birth -- The transgression of their race.

    White people resist seeing themselves in the face of the oppressor. That mirror reflection is almost too much to bear. I get it. So then they resent the person that holds up the mirror. But let me just say as directly as I can: White people must begin to see themselves in the faces of the mostly white police officers who keep committing these atrocities against Black and Brown people. This will not stop until you recognize that you are them. These officers are your brothers and sisters and aunts and cousins, and sons and daughters and nieces and nephews, and friends, and church members. You are them. And they are you.
    Throughout this anti-white tirade from a Big Ten professor, Cooper never once suggests that other races or creeds should look in mirror for similar actions. That would go against the creed of liberalism. The Muslim community need not answer for the killings of 5 service members in Chattanooga, or the Tsarnaev's Boston bombing. But the white community must answer for crimes committed by terrorists like Dylan Roof, or the alleged misconduct of a white police officer. This is the type of one-sided logic is simply standard procedure for liberals like Cooper, and liberal organizations like Salon.

    : http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/spen...hemselves-face
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Jolie Rouge For This Useful Post:

    boopster (07-23-2015)

  11. #513
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Oppressed Mizzou ‘Hunger Strike’ Student Is Actually Hilariously Wealthy…

    We’re still not sure what exactly happed at Mizzou (we try to get to the bottom of it here http://louderwithcrowder.com/?s=mizzou ), but at the center of it seems to be student Jonathan Butler going on hunger strike because…someone yelled a racial slur at him? Apparently it was traumatic enough he “updated his will and signed a ‘do not resuscitate’ order.” http://www.omaha.com/columnists/grac...de407d7e8.html



    Ok, so we have a college student who was “oppressed” at one of the top universities in the country. Someone may have yelled something. His SJW friends claim that someone smeared a poop swastika on a mirror. Though of course, there is no proof. Because when you see a poop-swastika, you don’t document that crap, you keep walking and Tweet about it. Also, we’re sure white privilege played a part in all this somehow.

    Here’s the rub though. Butler complains about white privilege and how it played a role in his oppression and poop-swastikas? I wish I was this oppressed… http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/c...e16fe05f3.html (special thanks to the Tweets of Paul Watson and Jim Hoft for bringing this to our attention):
    Johnathan Butler is a member of a prominent Omaha family. The newspaper says Butler’s father is Eric L. Butler, executive vice president for sales and marketing for the Union Pacific Railroad. His 2014 compensation was $8.4 million, according to regulatory filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
    That’s right. The student in the middle of all this Mizzou hype? He’s just another overprivileged college student living off of daddy’s millions.

    In other words, he’s your typical modern liberal activist.

    Allow us to re-cap the timeline for those who haven’t been following or are confused about WTF is going on with this school.

    •Kid complains about racial slurs. Goes on hunger strike.

    •Students claim to be victims of “systemic” racism on campus. Zero photos, video or any proof provided.

    •Students claim to find a “poop swastika” on campus. No photos, video or any proof provided.

    •No proof ever provided for “systemic” problem, so the “system president” Tim Wolfe doesn’t really do much.

    •Students get so angry and start protesting that Tim Wolfe resigns. To this day, nobody knows what he did wrong. No really, even MSNBC said “… huh?” (watch the video of a confused MSNBC here).

    •Students form another protest. They lock arms to lock out the press, physically assaulting a student reporter simply trying to document the whole ordeal (see the unbelievable video on said altercation here).

    •That night, SJW students claim there is gunfire on campus, and an official rally from the KKK. No photos, video or any proof provided.

    •All of the claims from last night are proven to be verifiably false.

    •Now we find out the “original” hunger-strike protestor is actually part of a multi-millionaire family.
    You cannot make this crap up. But if you’re wondering what to do with your crap, maybe make a winking smily face.


    http://louderwithcrowder.com/oppress...ously-wealthy/




    comments

    Now that the University’s President and Chancellor have left the campus, there will be no more racism at Mizzu, so everyone should be dutifully smug and superior! I think the liberals have figured out it’s best to exploit groups of the “oppressed ” without as much violence. I supposed if the president of the University had just cleaned the poop cover mirror, none of this would have happened!

    ...

    You actually make the perfect point: there’s no visual proof. These days, every single one of those kids has a sophisticated smart phone, and I’d bet BOTH kidneys that if just one of those allegations were true, there would be proof.

    ...

    In 1993, I was living in the Annex in an house with 2 other people . One was a black student at Ryerson. We got along just fine. One day I came home from work and the front of the house had bee painted with NIGGER, KKK, WHITE POWER, NIGGER GO HOME and swastikas. Naturally we were all very upset and cleaned it up. But we all lived in fear that this could become physically violent.

    Well as it turned out the NIGGER graffiti was pained by a friend of my roommate, a fellow black student at Ryerson. My roommate forced him to apologize to us for the damage and trauma he caused us all. But he finished it with “You white folks have no a sense humour”. The guy is now manages a museum of Toronto’s history.

    I called the police. They absolutely refused to believe a word I told them about the event. They accused me of doing the whole thing. I had to drop the subject in fear they would arrest me for the racially motivated hate crime. I called CITY TV and the Sun newspaper and got the same reaction. The truth was an utter impossibility. The truth is that a black student from Ryerson committed a racial hate crime and got away with it because of the colour of his skin. He is having a big laugh at all white people for being so stupid to fall for his bull shit. But he would be very offended if he was to be held accountable for his own actions.

    ...

    Yes you can make it up!
    White Girl from Montana, gets curly perm & wears make up. Lies to receive College grant money Destined for African-American Students & Lies on application to become a director for NAACP. Gets caught nd becomes the 1st Trans-Racial in America. Who said the American Dream is Dead? Ignorance is Bliss, especially on a College Campus near you. Knuckleheads!

    ...



    http://buzzpo.com/media-ignores-whit...hite-privilege


    ..




    I may have this all wrong but isn’t Missouri the school Michael Sams, a black gay football player, was celebrated for coming out? Also a quick google search found the Missouri Student government. It appears over 60% of the elected students are black. How is it possible black students don’t feel they welcome or represented on campus?

    http://msa.missouri.edu/branches/executive/


    ..

    https://thesnarkwhohuntsback.wordpre...ions-straight/

    The claims of students being called names does constitute racist acts. Unfortunately there is no proof but the claims made by the individuals. Racism and oppression are not one in the same. Refer to the above for correct definitions and I invite you to read the comments from that page too. There is nothing proven in the University of Missouri system that challenges minority students from obtaining the same goals and privileges of any other student, ie. unequal access to resources. In fact, there is a diversity scholarship only obtainable to minority students that no one else can obtain, nearly 10,000 in total.

    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  12. #514
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts


    Jonathan Butler, the University of Missouri graduate student who went on a weekend hunger strike, comes from a family worth $20 million. His father is a railroad vice president and made over $8 million last year.

    Butler complained about white privilege.
    He argued he was oppressed.
    St. Louis Today reported:

    “Jonathan Butler, a central figure in the protests at the University of Missouri, is an Omaha native and the son of a railroad vice president, the Omaha World-Herald reports.

    Butler refused food last week in a move to force the university system’s president, Timothy M. Wolfe, from office. Wolfe resigned Monday and Butler ended his hunger strike.

    Jonathan Butler played high-school football at Omaha Central High, where he won a state championship, and earned a bachelor’s degree in business administration from Mizzou, the newspaper reports. He is working toward a master’s degree in educational leadership and policy.

    He is a member of a prominent Omaha family. The newspaper says that Butler’s father is Eric L. Butler, executive vice president for sales and marketing for the Union Pacific Railroad. His 2014 compensation was $8.4 million, according to regulatory filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015...th-20-million/


    Was The Poop Swastika Incident At Mizzou A Giant Hoax?
    November 10, 2015 By Sean Davis


    Something stinks at the University of Missouri. A reported incident of vandalism at Mizzou sparked university-wide protests, a boycott by the school’s 4-5 football team, and eventually the resignation of the university’s president and chancellor.

    There’s only one problem: no evidence of the alleged incident, in which a poop swastika on the wall of a dormitory restroom was reported, has ever been made publicly available. Did this incident occur as reported, or was it an immaculate defecation that formed the foundation of an unimaginable deception?

    According to Billy Donley, the president of Mizzou’s Residence Halls Association (RHA), the poop swastika was reported at approximately 2:00 a.m. on October 24, 2015.

    “On Saturday, October 24th, at 2:00am an individual came into one of the restrooms in Gateway Hall and drew a swastika on the wall with their own feces,” Donley wrote in a letter several days after the alleged incident. “This event happened while many students, including myself, were already asleep.”

    Later in his letter, Donley noted that he only found out about the alleged vandalism incident “via a flyer posted on the walls” of the dorm.

    Although Donley did not respond to repeated requests for comment prior to publication, The Federalist spoke with two RHA staffers while trying to get in touch with Donley. Neither had personally witnessed the poop swastika. When asked if there was any photographic evidence of the alleged incident, one staffer replied, “Not to my knowledge.”

    Frankie Minor, the director of residential life at Mizzou, did not respond to repeated requests for comment on whether he personally saw the poop swastika or any photographic evidence of it.

    The Federalist also attempted to contact Christian Basi, the associate director of the University of Missouri News Bureau, who previously told the Columbia Missourian on Oct. 30 that the incident had been immediately reported to Mizzou police. Basi did not respond to requests for comment prior to the publication of this article.

    Calls to the University of Missouri Police Department, which responded to and investigated the alleged poop swastika incident, also failed to yield any evidence of the poopstika.

    Multiple activists on Twitter pointed to this photo as proof that the incident occurred as reported, but a Google search for the same image shows that it has been floating around the Internet for nearly a year. A reddit thread from November of 2014 appears to contain the earliest publication of the photo in question, meaning that it most certainly does not constitute proof of the incident alleged to have occurred at Mizzou on October 24, 2015.

    Maj. Brian Weimer, the public information officer for the Mizzou police department, told The Federalist that he also did not personally see the poop swastika that was reported to police. When asked if anyone in the police department personally witnessed the swastika, Maj. Weimer clammed up and referred all questions about the incident to the university’s custodian of public records.

    The Federalist also repeatedly contacted @ConcernedStudent1950, the Twitter account representing Mizzou protesters who issued a series of demands of university administrators after the alleged poop swastika incident made headlines. The individuals running the @CS1950 account failed to produce any photographic or documentary evidence of the incident prior to publication of this article.

    While a mere absence of evidence is not synonymous with evidence of absence, the complete lack of any verifiable photographic evidence of the alleged poop swastika and the lack of any named eye witnesses raises serious questions about the veracity of a racially charged incident of vandalism that eventually led to the resignation of the University of Missouri’s two top administrators.

    Did the incident happen as reported, or did two university administrators resign over protests that were sparked by a hoax? And if the incident did happen as reported, a proposition for which no publicly available evidence currently exists, how did university administrators and law enforcement authorities confirm that the vandalism was driven by racial animosity, as opposed to being promulgated as a public relations stunt meant to tar the university for failing to provide an environment free of racist invective? It would not be the first time a public university fell victim to a high profile PR stunt that was later revealed to be a fabrication. Either way, students, their parents, university employees, and Missouri taxpayers deserve solid, verifiable answers based on clear evidence about what exactly transpired in that Gateway Wall bathroom in the early morning of October 24.

    Under the provisions of Missouri’s broad public records laws, The Federalist has requested from the University of Missouri copies of any and all records relating to the alleged vandalism, including any police or incident reports describing the investigation of the poop swastika by law enforcement authorities, as well as any photographic records of the alleged swastika, and will make that information available if and when it is received from university officials.

    http://thefederalist.com/2015/11/10/...-a-giant-hoax/
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  13. #515
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    I’m sure by now you’ve noticed that the University of Missouri has taken a beating with all the protests about racial insensitivity.

    The whole situation began because an inebriated student began using racial slurs, which led to members of the football team refusing to practice or play.

    The University of Missouri system’s president, Tim Wolfe, and chancellor, R. Bowen Loftin, were forced to resign thanks to radicals who deemed the school had done little to combat racism.

    Here’s a fantastic take by a female student at Mizzou regarding the current situation…



    Strong words, but factual.

    Because of the actions of a few, everyone gets punished. Or, the motto by which liberals live their lives.

    The president and chancellor may have “resigned,” but that’s only because the football team earns so much cash that they couldn’t afford to have to forfeit games. So really, they were pushed out for being white males who looked the other way – or whatever.

    This situation should prove that political correctness ruins everything.

    http://www.youngcons.com/brilliant-m...-the-protests/
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jolie Rouge For This Useful Post:

    boopster (11-11-2015), hblueeyes (11-11-2015)

  15. #516
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Mizzou Professor Melissa Click Having Charges Filed Against her by Student
    Michael Cantrell - November 12, 2015

    Mizzou professor Melissa Click — the woman caught in a video calling for a reporter to be forcefully removed from a protest with “muscle” — is having charges filed against her by a student.

    I say she’s getting exactly what she deserves.

    From Breitbart: http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...melissa-click/

    Mark Schierbecker, the Mizzou student behind the video catching the University of Missouri’s communications professor Melissa Click calling for pushback against the media, preventing the protest from being covered, filed charges against her with the University of Missouri police department. http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...acial-protest/

    Schierbecker told Breitbart News, “I pressed charges against Melissa Click and also the former Associate Dean for undergraduate studies at the Journalism school just filed a formal complaint with the Title IX office about her.”

    KSDK reported that police department spokesperson Major Brian Weimer said the complaint had been filed and “We are looking into this and following up.” http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/educa...scle/75648228/

    Click was caught calling for “muscle” to get Schierbecker removed from recording the protest that has sparked national outrage across the nation. In the video, Click attempts to grab Schierbecker’s camera and stop him from filming of the protest.
    Lefties are so horribly hypocritical it’s almost laughable. Almost.

    These are the same folks who scream and cry about police violence, and then turn around and threaten to assault people.

    It makes absolutely no sense.

    What Click was doing was inciting violence and violating someone’s First Amendment rights, therefore, she absolutely earned these charges.

    I don’t care about the rules on a silly college campus. This is America and we have free speech and free press as guaranteed rights in the Constitution for a reason.

    http://www.youngcons.com/mizzou-prof...er-by-student/
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

  16. #517
    Jolie Rouge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Lan astaslem !
    Posts
    60,656
    Thanks
    2,750
    Thanked 5,510 Times in 3,654 Posts
    Mizzou student body president admits to spreading false rumor KKK was on campus

    November 11, 2015 | Tom Tillison

    Much like the lie known as “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot,” rumors and unsubstantiated allegations continue to flow freely on the University of Missouri campus, with some of the worst of it coming from student body president Payton Head.

    Head, who had previously claimed he was called the “n-word” from a passing pickup truck — one of the actions that led to the school’s president, Tim Wolfe, resigning on Monday — was at it again on Tuesday.

    This time, he took to social media to warn students about the KKK being on campus, according to Twitchy.com:



    There’s only one small problem — it wasn’t true … never mind that this came from the president of the student body!

    Head would eventually delete the false claim and post an apology:





    Ironically, after the school’s online emergency information center posted a comment on Twitter about not spreading rumors, Head joined in to instruct students not to do what he was guilty of doing:


    The reaction on social media to Head’s irresponsible actions included calls for HIS resignation — an unlikely occurrence being that he’s a member of a protected class — AND his arrest.


    http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/11/...-campus-272739
    Laissez les bon temps rouler! Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.** a 4 day work week & sex slaves ~ I say Tyt for PRESIDENT! Not to be taken internally, literally or seriously ....Suki ebaynni IS THAT BETTER ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in