Thread: 9/11 Commission
View Single Post
Old 06-02-2005, 12:20 AM   #59 (permalink)
mesue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: not the middle of nowhere but I can see it from here.
Posts: 4,314
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: 26
Thanked 167 Times in 92 Posts
mesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 9/11 Commission

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolie Rouge
Bumping for Mesue
Thanks for thinking of me. The 911 commission went with the official story and never looked beyond it, they did not ask the really tough questions like why
http://www.standdown.net/ Almost one hundred and thirteen minutes elapsed between the time American Airlines Flight 11 lost contact and was hijacked at 8:13:31 till the time United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania at 10:06:05. One hour and fifty-three minutes went by and the USAF did not intercept any one of these four "hijacked" airlines. To understand all the rules, regulation and procedures that make this totally impossible to happen, please read:

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standard Intercept Procedures http://www.StandDown.net/FAAStandard...Procedures.htm

http://www.standdown.net/
On Oct. 23, 1999, golfer Payne Stewart's incapacitated Learjet going from Orlando to Dallas made a wrong turn. Within 19 minutes after the flight appeared to be off course, an Air Force F-16 was dispatched and ready to intercept the plane.

The thing is Jolie the 911 commission was formed only after the poor families of the victims lobbied for it, Bush fought forming it from the begginning but it still did a really bad job of answering some of the most important questions if you want to know how bad a job go to this website and others like it and see for yourself. http://www.standdown.net/
You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to see something was terribly wrong that day for instance in the report there is a mention of NORAD having some sort of training going on that day practicing what to do in case of hi-jackings. There is even a tape of where the controllers at one airport calls and asks them to check out one of the planes and says its a hi-jacking and the guy asks at NORAD if this one is for real and the controller responds that yes it is. There were practices going on that with as many as 32 fake hi-jacking being shown. So was it a fluke if this thing happened as they say that they the terrorists picked the same day that the training was going on? Did they have inside info? Why use the real instruments why not train part of the personnel at one time on simulators, while having the rest minding the store so to speak? If they indeed were using the whole program for training who came up with that idiotic idea leaving the skies and security vulnerable for those hours?
__________________
Ignorance is bliss but the question is can we afford it?
mesue is offline   Reply With Quote