Big Big Forums - Coupons, Freebies, Deals & Discounts - View Single Post - Appeals court: Terri Schiavo parents cannot intervene

YankeeMary · 03-22-2005, 07:20 AM

I could kick my hiney, last night I watched an interview with Teri's "guardian of law", and for the life of me I can't remember his name. Anyways, he was neither on her DH side or the parents side, he was ordered by the court to decide what was best for Teri. He stated that her "moaning" was not talking and would do it through out the day, never on command, consitantly. In his opinion, Teri was/is still in a veg. state. He stated that her parents were very loving and caring over Teri and were great people. He stated that Micheal was a loving, devoted husband that took many many measures to "bring" Teri back, including taking her to California for internal electrodes, which failed. He stated that for the first 6-7 years the parents and Micheal got along great and worked together getting Teri all the medical help possible, when the doctors (numerous) stated that Teri would remain in this condition forever. Micheal finally accepted this, her parents didn't, that is when the acusations began. This guardian spent 30 days with her, some times 4 hours at a time. He tried, begged and pleaded Teri to respond to him, do anyhing to prove she was "there", in 30 days, she never did. Out of all honesty this was one of the best interviews, if not the best (IMO) I have seen over this case, he was fair and equal with all involved. IMO I feel that he was appointed by the court to be guardian at law, and he walked in there being just that and walked away being Teri's friend.

03-22-2005, 07:20 AM	#221 (permalink)
YankeeMary Puff the Magic Dragon Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Georgia Posts: 14,086 iTrader: (43) Thanks: 2,194 Thanked 3,527 Times in 1,439 Posts	Re: Appeals court: Terri Schiavo parents cannot intervene I could kick my hiney, last night I watched an interview with Teri's "guardian of law", and for the life of me I can't remember his name. Anyways, he was neither on her DH side or the parents side, he was ordered by the court to decide what was best for Teri. He stated that her "moaning" was not talking and would do it through out the day, never on command, consitantly. In his opinion, Teri was/is still in a veg. state. He stated that her parents were very loving and caring over Teri and were great people. He stated that Micheal was a loving, devoted husband that took many many measures to "bring" Teri back, including taking her to California for internal electrodes, which failed. He stated that for the first 6-7 years the parents and Micheal got along great and worked together getting Teri all the medical help possible, when the doctors (numerous) stated that Teri would remain in this condition forever. Micheal finally accepted this, her parents didn't, that is when the acusations began. This guardian spent 30 days with her, some times 4 hours at a time. He tried, begged and pleaded Teri to respond to him, do anyhing to prove she was "there", in 30 days, she never did. Out of all honesty this was one of the best interviews, if not the best (IMO) I have seen over this case, he was fair and equal with all involved. IMO I feel that he was appointed by the court to be guardian at law, and he walked in there being just that and walked away being Teri's friend. __________________ The more you complain, the longer God makes you live.