View Single Post
Old 02-21-2005, 03:05 AM   #10 (permalink)
mesue
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: not the middle of nowhere but I can see it from here.
Posts: 4,314
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: 26
Thanked 167 Times in 92 Posts
mesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond reputemesue has a reputation beyond repute
Re: personal retirement accounts for Social Security recipients ?

It was a 600.00 plain old run of the mill hammer. LOL they mention it in the movie Independence Day I think. Most people think this money that is hiiden like this (hidden none too brightly I might add or we would not know about those 600.00 hammers) for operations that the government (Congress and Senate) does not know about, you know like the Iran contra affair in the Reagan years, of course if I recall corrently that was partly financed with cocaine wasn't it. Please correct me if I am wrong on this one, going on memeory alone here on this one.
Also Jolie somehow you and I have reversed roles your more the conservative type and I am more the liberal type. I am saying wait and investigate and you are saying give me my money and let me invest it. LOL I'm not saying it is a bad idea I'm just saying lets take the time to make sure it is the right thing to do. I recently saw a reporter say that mostly the ones who do good investments are going to be paying a huge chunk of it right back to the government, and still only able to get a monthly check from it, I'm supposing this is to cover the bad investors, a guess of course. Of course if worst comes to worst we can always invest in hammers to sell back to the government.
mesue is offline   Reply With Quote